Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

When do you expect an iMac redesign?

  • 4rd quarter 2019

    Votes: 34 4.1%
  • 1st quarter 2020

    Votes: 23 2.8%
  • 2nd quarter 2020

    Votes: 119 14.5%
  • 3rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 131 15.9%
  • 4rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 172 20.9%
  • 2021 or later

    Votes: 343 41.7%

  • Total voters
    822
  • Poll closed .
I created a thread, but I guess it is getting lost in the slew of posts:

I have a 27" late 2013 iMac (3.5GHz quad-core i7, 8GB RAM + 2x8GB user-installed, 1TB fusion Drive and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M) that just came out of "repair". It basically died in March but because of COVID, I waited for the stores to reopen to get it checked out. They got it working, but the issue is the motherboard and they can't say how long it'll hold on (and it's 800$ to replace it, which at this point isn't worth it for a 7yo computer).

I'm a video editor and I do photography, and until problems with the HDD and then the motherboard, never had much issues (even with 8K raw files, I just did proxies. The only thing that caused hiccups was when I tried to stich really big panoramas in Photoshop and it would run out of RAM and HDD space). Because I had a NVIDIA GPU, to take advatange of CUDA, I was stuck at High Sierra, and the whole thing was a mess.

So now, with today's refresh, I'm tempted to upgrade. I've been working on the office's Windows PC (now in my room) and that thing isn't all that. For some reason there's input lag when working in Photoshop, and the fan runs 100% of the time. My room is always at least 3-5 degrees hotter than the rest of the place.

With the Apple Silicon/redesign coming, I'm hesitant though. I'm thinking of getting a "modestly" spec'd iMac (Standard glass, 3.8GHz 8-core i7, 8GB RAM (and buy a 2x16GB upgrade seperately, for 40GB total) Radeon Pro 5500 XT, 1TB SSD storage). With the student discount, it'd be CAD 3 675$ with the AirPod Pro. Then I'd also have the option of selling it when the redesign comes out.

Any thoughts? I have my cursor ready to click on Checkout, but I'm hesitant...

The new Intel iMac will be a significant boost for you.

So if you buy a £2500 Tier 3 spec iMac it will double as a £2500 PC.

You can always buy an AS iMac when it comes and run both side by side.

The 8 core 5500xt is great value.

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martinpa
I also have the late 2012 iMac and trying to decide if I should update or keep hanging on.

Depends on what work you do.

And if your machine is 'bogged' down for production work. I had a 2012. It had had it's day.

I had hoped to hang on for the AS iMac. But my iMac fried. So I've spent march to august without a working Mac.

But to be fair we didn't know for sure that AS was coming for sure THIS year until WWDC.

If you can hang on. Hang on. (Easy for anyone else to say...)

My iMac was dead. And it was wait another 5/6 or 9? Months for an AS iMac. And even longer for the larger screened version...?

The current Intel iMac is a worthy iMac with the caveats of iStale design. Specs wise, this is impressive for an Intel iMac machine. Compared to the 2019 machine. You get more performance for your money.

Buying. Is the Mac user's call.

If my 2012 iMac had been working? I'd have waited until the October Mac fall event to get a clearer AS picture.

Cook said AS Mac was coming. Didn't specify laptop or desktop.

Azrael.
 
I use my computer for very light home usage but I do need 1T possibly for photos and files. Not a gamer.

For this usage, would I notice enough difference between these two to pay the extra $300 ?

I'd get the 8 core 5500xt with a 1TB SSD.

Future proofing in that one. Great value spec.

Azrael.
 
Same here but more photography than video editing. How on earth did you survive using an older computer with 8K Raw footage?

The AS processors won't be hitting it right out of the gate immediately matching a 10 Core CPU and 5700XT GPU. Designing GPU is no easy feat and NVIDIA & AMD have been doing it for a long time.

I have no idea when Phase One, Adobe, Blackmagic, Maxon will be updating their software to run on AS natively. So for me it is going to be an Intel iMac for the interim.

Even though there is a lack of enough thunderbolt ports for me, I am going to aim for the top most spec iMac. The machine needs to fly especially when I am dealing with ProRes 422 HQ files.

Ironically,

Max Tech' is showing a video demonstrating iPads with certain 4k/ 8k codecs with buttery smooth performance which even high end Macs choke on.

When it comes to video and image processing? I think the preview evidence so far from WWDC and on Max Tech's YouTube videos points to Apple Silicon kicking the snot out of the rig I've just ordered for those kind of workflows.

I expect the iMac24 to pull close to the 10 core and 5700XT in general...and obliterate them for certain user workflows. The single core performance of the Intel is nothing special. The 5700XT is last year's gpu.

There's nothing remarkable about either of them. Intel's process is year's old on 14+++++++++. And AMD haven't even got a high end gpu out yet.

I can see why Apple lost patience and decided to go it alone.

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pldelisle
I put together the specs for the whole AMD Pro 5000-series in MBP/iMac/Mac Pro for comparison. I also included specs for RX cards that pc users buy or you can use as eGPU with Mac. Many tests on Youtube for example show the result for RX cards which are faster than Pro cards in Macs. The specs are from AMD's website.


5300 in iMac is like 5500M in MBP in terms of TFLOPS. 5500XT is like 5600M in MBP. The more I think of it the more disappointed I feel about the GPU options in these new iMacs. I'm not even a serious gamer, but a casual gamer that plays games even with 20 fps with my iMac 2011 Radeon 6750 512MB, but as it is now the only option for us that want to buy a decent and somewhat future proof gaming Mac is to spend 3500-3800 dollars (in Sweden) on a iMac 27" with Radeon 5700/5700XT. That's a lot for me.

For God's sake Apple, Radeon 5300 is the worst card in the 5000-series. You can't even buy it in the retail stores or from AMD. You can't even now pay a bit extra to get a better GPU like 575X vs 570X. You can't even choose storage size for the first 27" model. You're stuck with 256GB. You must go all the way up to the top model to get 5500XT, the cheapest and most underpowered GPU in the 5000-series on the market which manages about 40-50 fps in 1440p TODAY. That for ca $3100!

After almost three decades of owning Macs even I’m starting to agree that Apple plays cheap and Macs are overpriced toys, at least GPU wise. I think this update is one of the worst with least options for those without a pocket full of money. Even with money I couldn’t justify $3800 to get good GPU performance. $400 extra for 5700 when it costs ca $160 extra for RX5700 in stores? $660 extra for 5700XT when RX5700XT costs ca $220 extra in stores? I know you can’t get 16GB in stores but still…

Instead of giving 5300 to iMac 21.5" they gave it to 27" and didn't do a thing with 21.5". The base 27” should start with 5500XT. There would still be several options for the other models. For example, what happened to 5600 and 5600XT? Tier 2 iMac 27” could have 5600 and the top 27” could start with 5600XT, with 5700 and 5700XT as option. Or it could be like 5500XT, 5600XT and 5700 with 5700XT as BTO, but 5300 in both cheaper models? Come on, I’m not that much of a fanboy.

My only hope now is that Apple gets its act together and at least offers decent GPUs in AS iMacs. Otherwise I don’t know what to do. PC, Xbox and PS5 is not an option. Just give me decent GPUs Apple in all your iMacs, not only the top model. Btw, don’t put your money on the 10-core i9 for gaming. Better to buy the 8-core with higher base frequency.


View attachment 940674

100% agree.

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Homy
Knowing the price of iMac i went out and got Final Cut and Motion 5 today.
325€ due to 20% on top with the 100€ cards and even got a spare 2,52€

Still a lot of money. But i guess i am staying with Apple and saying goodbye to adobe soon.
Sort of a bit of an extra rats tail with all the learning to do and some fonts to buy i guess.

Bit underwhelmed that i can't order yet because the small vendors apparently have no price lists yet so they can't finish up the order despite the prices being the exact same as on apples homepage.
 
I also posted this in another thread, but maybe the many people here can also help me with my decision. I am currently torn between

iMac 27"
3,6 GHz 10‑Core Intel Core i9
32GB RAM
Radeon Pro 5700 XT (16GB)
1TB SSD

and

iMac Pro
3,0 GHz 10-Core Intel Xeon W
32GB RAM
Radeon Pro Vega 56 (8GB)
1TB SSD

which amounts to roughly the same price in my region. Plus, I now somehow read more and more posts about it being better to just wait for an AS iMac, as these two might drop support quite soon, but if I am paying that much money for an iMac, I want to be able to use it around 5-7 years. Is that realistic/possible?

You'll get 5-7 years out of this iMac if you're gentle. ;)

If you can get the iMac Pro with better cooling and the sexy Space Grey? For the same price? Go for it.

Azrael.
 
I definitely need some kind of a machine right now, as my current laptop has stopped working. My third option would be a 16" MacBook Pro, but in regards to AS, there's the same problem there.

The cooling solution is what makes me lean towards the iMP, but I don't know how well those 2017 components still hold up.

The Tier 3 iMac is sound value with 8 core and 5500XT (bump the gpu if you can...to the 5700XT 16 gig.)

...and 500 Gig SSD. (Bump that to 1TB.)

Azrael.
[automerge]1596631109[/automerge]
I have found something interesting in Apple Support tech specs for the new iMac: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP821?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

It seems that the noise levels are much lower then the 2019 iMac and they seem to be in line with iMac Pro, at least at the base config: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP771?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Apple definitely must have changed something in the cooling system...

Thank the lord for that.

Good catch, Yellow_Lupine.

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pldelisle
I know your pain because I'm totally in the same boat. I got the same iMac model like You and its GPU fried in February. I'm tempted to get mid-tier 27" (3.3GHz 6-core, 512 SSD), but afraid to pour money down the drain on declining technology. It's not my style, each time Apple made transition I made jump too: I bought PPC Mac (6200), then I bought C2D Mac (white iMac). Decisions, decisions...

All tech' is 'declining.'

It's simply a case of whether you need to buy now or not.

AS is going to be great. But it's not here right now.

Azrael.
 
Most of what I use is Adobe, which should be good on AS, then sometimes DaVinci (I don't think they'll take a long time to move to AS either, but I could be surprised) or Apple's own FCPX/Motion/Compressor/LogicProX. It's more so Photoshop Plug-Ins I would be worried losing when we move to AS, but I still doubt it, since I only use a few, that are pretty widespread. But, yeah, since my iMac is pretty unreliable now, I think I'll go for it. When the AS ones come out (which is likely in a year's time IMO for the 27 equivalent) I'll can take my time to see what people say and decide if I want to switch, at which point the 2020iMac shouldn't have lost too much value, especially considering it'll be the last intel one, and some people will surely want to hang on to those.



I've been editing 6K and then 8K footage out of RED cameras since I got my 2013 iMac. Always just made proxies overnight (or over two nights depending on the project) in REDCINE-X. Even if it could run 8K RAW flawlessly, I would probably still make proxies; while it does that, I can read over the script, read scipty notes, or start the project in Premiere and organize things as they finish transcoding. My work environment doesn't demand super fast turnaround, so I'm okay with working like that.



I'm hesitant to upgrade the CPU and GPU... I want to keep the cost low, while having a good enough machine. My 2013 iMac was an quad-core i7, so I figured I don't need to pay the extra for the i9 (unless there's something about the i9 I don't know?). As for the GPU, the upgrades are pretty expensive, and I figured even with the base 5500 XT it would be an upgrade over my NVIDIA 780M...

Compared to the machine you have now. The T3 8 core with 5500XT is the sweet spot with an actual SSD included.

It will be night and day compared to a 2013 machine?

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Martinpa
I don't think it's ugly.
And the flipping horrible 12 inch MacBook still sells for over 500€. Apple Computers hold value despite all flaws. The Fanboy is your reselling friend.

It will still fetch a decent price 2nd hand. Macs do. I've looked at the Macs on eBay and the prices are sky high.

Azrael.
 
I'm still debating between the 8 core i7 or the 10 core i9. I mostly use my machine for audio work as well as development - just trying to see if I would benefit from the 10 core or whether that money could be used elsewhere...

More cores. More plug ins?

From the AMD hackintoshes that use more cores (check out YouTube...) the benching on Logic suggests having more cores can be a 'Good Thing.' TM.

I'd got the 10 core. 10 cores. 20 threads!

8 core? 16 threads.

Plus the i9 is 'a bit newer.'

You could go for the Tier 3 8 core/5500XT and upgrade the CPU on it. Keep the GPU as 5500XT and up the internal SSD to 1TB.

Azrael.
 
How long does it usually take for 3rd parties to start selling these after they've been announced e.g. Curries/PC World/Argos etc.?

Er...PC World.

I remember wanting to check out the 2019 iMac when it launched. It took PC World weeks(!) to get one in the store.

Very irritating. When I did finally check it out. I just couldn't get past the 580 gpu. Same for the rest I should imagine.

Apple have 2 year's 0% finance. And you can customise the spec. But if you want to 'feel' the iMac love in person, then surely an Apple Store won't be long in getting them in. You'll wait a bit longer for the PC World store, though.

Azrael.
 
More cores. More plug ins?

From the AMD hackintoshes that use more cores (check out YouTube...) the benching on Logic suggests having more cores can be a 'Good Thing.' TM.

I'd got the 10 core. 10 cores. 20 threads!

8 core? 16 threads.

Plus the i9 is 'a bit newer.'

You could go for the Tier 3 8 core/5500XT and upgrade the CPU on it. Keep the GPU as 5500XT and up the internal SSD to 1TB.

Azrael.

You've twisted my arm 😉 That's pretty much exactly what I was thinking for the rest of it, potentially get a Samsung T5 at some point to offload some media files.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
Dosing.

I think so. The T3 model is very good value for money. It's an iMac Pro for half the price performance wise. Give or take.

10 Core will give you an extra 4 threads over the 8 core version. It's an extra 2 cores and that may help future proof your machine a bit more. I think that's the area of focus for your purchase perhaps.

Most of the musicians on here have emphasized cpu and de-emphasised the gpu.

The 5500XT is no disaster. Though if you would like a 'bit' more get the 5700 (and don't bother with the 5700XT.)

Yes. And spend the rest on the Samsung T5 at some point.

Azrael.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Dosing
Here is the debate I am having. My parents have a Late 2009 27" iMac which is obviously long EOL'd. My fear is it will die sometime in the transition and don't want them on a Gen 1 AS product. I am debating on giving them my 2019 27" iMac and bumping myself to the 2020 27" iMac for the 5700 XT since it appears to be a pretty good bump from my Vega 48. This will provide them a new computer to take them well into the AS era allowing for software and typical 1st gen Apple kinks to work themselves out.

I am not in any rush because I would be curious on cooling and performance between the 8 core i7( which matches my 8 core i9) and the 10 core i9 paired with the 5700 XT. I don't think I would need 10 cores for my uses( or the extra 4 threads) as well and could put that money towards either third party RAM or the 2 TB SSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
Here is the debate I am having. My parents have a Late 2009 27" iMac which is obviously long EOL'd. My fear is it will die sometime in the transition and don't want them on a Gen 1 AS product. I am debating on giving them my 2019 27" iMac and bumping myself to the 2020 27" iMac for the 5700 XT since it appears to be a pretty good bump from my Vega 48. This will provide them a new computer to take them well into the AS era allowing for software and typical 1st gen Apple kinks to work themselves out.

I am not in any rush because I would be curious on cooling and performance between the 8 core i7( which matches my 8 core i9) and the 10 core i9 paired with the 5700 XT. I don't think I would need 10 cores as well and could put that money towards either third party RAM or the 2 TB SSD.

8 cores. 5700XT 16 gigs. 2TB. Third party ram. That would be a decent bump.

Hand over the 2019 to parents. Sounds like a plan.

The fall out over the AS transition for the iMac is at least 3-6 months away for the 24 inch model. The larger model may be a year away or so. Only Apple knows.

But 'A' Apple Silicon Mac of somesort is coming by the end of this year.

Azrael.
 
Here is the debate I am having. My parents have a Late 2009 27" iMac which is obviously long EOL'd. My fear is it will die sometime in the transition and don't want them on a Gen 1 AS product. I am debating on giving them my 2019 27" iMac and bumping myself to the 2020 27" iMac for the 5700 XT since it appears to be a pretty good bump from my Vega 48. This will provide them a new computer to take them well into the AS era allowing for software and typical 1st gen Apple kinks to work themselves out.

I am not in any rush because I would be curious on cooling and performance between the 8 core i7( which matches my 8 core i9) and the 10 core i9 paired with the 5700 XT. I don't think I would need 10 cores as well and could put that money towards either third party RAM or the 2 TB SSD.
2009 27" iMac supports High Sierra and it's still up to date with regards to security updates, so that's fine. CPU performance is also pretty good. The main drawback with the machine is that it has a hard drive so drive access is slow, but if your parents are fine with that, then I wouldn't worry about it.

It sounds like you may be looking for an excuse to upgrade. If so, that's fine, but really there's nothing wrong with their machine except the hard drive. As long as they have backups, you can always buy a new machine when their machine breaks down.

FWIW, my 2010 Core i7 iMac works fine too, although I must admit lately I've only used it as a monitor since I bought another iMac in 2017. I find that the 2010 takes a long time to boot and load applications because of the hard drive, but once the application is loaded (eg. browser), it's fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pldelisle
2009 27" iMac supports High Sierra and it's still up to date with regards to security updates, so that's fine. CPU performance is also pretty good. The only drawback with the machine is that it has a hard drive but if your parents are fine with that, then I wouldn't worry about it.

It sounds like you may be looking for an excuse to upgrade. If so, that's fine, but really there's nothing wrong with their machine except the hard drive. As long as they have backups, you can always buy a new machine when their machine breaks down.

FWIW, my 2010 works just fine too, although I must admit lately I've only used it as a monitor since I bought another in 2017.

Maybe I am looking for an excuse! But High Sierra support drops in 3 months. I just don't want the machine to break down during the transition. Both of us need an x86 machine right now. So it gives me the excuse to bump up my machine for the better GPU performance and gives them a modern machine.

Searching Geekbench.... I would probably stick with the 10700 instead of the 10900. The 10700/10900 don't have much of an advantage single core over the 9900K. So if I was to bump it up, I think the i7 would more than suit my needs and money could be applied elsewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
Knowing the price of iMac i went out and got Final Cut and Motion 5 today.
325€ due to 20% on top with the 100€ cards and even got a spare 2,52€

Still a lot of money. But i guess i am staying with Apple and saying goodbye to adobe soon.
Sort of a bit of an extra rats tail with all the learning to do and some fonts to buy i guess.

Bit underwhelmed that i can't order yet because the small vendors apparently have no price lists yet so they can't finish up the order despite the prices being the exact same as on apples homepage.

I'll be getting Final Cut/Motion and Logic at some point. 20% sales discounts, cards...and spare codes. That all brings the price down.

Adobe. Meh. A stink best left behind.

So you're waiting on your 3rd party vendor to order?

Azrael.
 
2009 27" iMac supports High Sierra and it's still up to date with regards to security updates, so that's fine. CPU performance is also pretty good. The main drawback with the machine is that it has a hard drive so drive access is slow, but if your parents are fine with that, then I wouldn't worry about it.

It sounds like you may be looking for an excuse to upgrade. If so, that's fine, but really there's nothing wrong with their machine except the hard drive. As long as they have backups, you can always buy a new machine when their machine breaks down.

FWIW, my 2010 Core i7 iMac works fine too, although I must admit lately I've only used it as a monitor since I bought another iMac in 2017. I find that the 2010 takes a long time to boot and load applications because of the hard drive, but once the application is loaded (eg. browser), it's fine.
I was going to say the same.
You can always run the built-in diagnostic to see if everything is okay. If it hasn’t failed in 11 years it won’t. The only part that can break is the mechanical hard drive inside.
Change it for a Crucial MX500 SSD and it will last until the end of the transition. I did the exact same thing to a guy yesterday with its 2010 MacBook Pro 17. Upgraded RAM to 12GB by popping a 8GB module and installed a Crucial Mx500 500GB. Installed Catalina on it. Runs like a charm for a 10 years old laptop. You couldn’t tell this laptop had 10 years old.
 
I'm still debating between the 8 core i7 or the 10 core i9. I mostly use my machine for audio work as well as development - just trying to see if I would benefit from the 10 core or whether that money could be used elsewhere...

For a DAW the new i7 is plenty. Use the money saved for additional storage or sticks of RAM.
 
Maybe I am looking for an excuse! But High Sierra support drops in 3 months. I just don't want the machine to break down during the transition. Both of us need an x86 machine right now. So it gives me the excuse to bump up my machine for the better GPU performance and gives them a modern machine.

Searching Geekbench.... I would probably stick with the 10700 instead of the 10900. The 10700/10900 don't have much of an advantage single core over the 9900K. So if I was to bump it up, I think the i7 would more than suit my needs and money could be applied elsewhere.
There's nothing stopping you from buying a refurb / sale priced Intel iMac in 2021 if it breaks down then. However, I wouldn't be surprised if it continues to function normally for several more years. I have a 2006 iMac that still has its original drive. It's slow and is stuck on Snow Leopard, but everything still works. That's 14 years on the original hard drive!

I was going to say the same.
You can always run the built-in diagnostic to see if everything is okay. If it hasn’t failed in 11 years it won’t. The only part that can break is the mechanical hard drive inside.
Change it for a Crucial MX500 SSD and it will last until the end of the transition. I did the exact same thing to a guy yesterday with its 2010 MacBook Pro 17. Upgraded RAM to 12GB by popping a 8GB module and installed a Crucial Mx500 500GB. Installed Catalina on it. Runs like a charm for a 10 years old laptop. You couldn’t tell this laptop had 10 years old.
I thought about doing that to my 2010 before buying the 2017, but I wanted the 2017 just because. ;) (I could get a work related subsidy too, so that pushed me.) The problem was the local repair shop was charging a LOT to do the replacement, and at the time I wasn't brave enough to do it.

At this point I wonder if I should do it, but I still haven't because I've been using it as a monitor for a dual 27" iMac setup, so the effort and cost would be wasted.
 
Probably means nothing although I wish its better cooling.
I've checked it against my 2017 15" MBP which is like a jet engine even for basic stuff sometimes and the numbers were half the iMac so I don't think this is what we are hoping for unfortunately :(

I have found something interesting in Apple Support tech specs for the new iMac: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP821?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

It seems that the noise levels are much lower then the 2019 iMac and they seem to be in line with iMac Pro, at least at the base config: https://support.apple.com/kb/SP771?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US

Apple definitely must have changed something in the cooling system...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.