I'd say that this is exactly what my current screen looks like. The two I got from KRCS and then immediately returned were worse. This is all based on the photo. So, the question is whether the photo represents your screen.
It's funny because to my eyes, even in that photo, there is virtually no shift in tint from the top to bottom. The only really noticeable thing is a slight shift in brightness from the centre (brightest) to the edges, and pretty much every such screenshot I've seen looks the same.
Ultimately, if my work consisted of looking at a blank screen with grey bars on it all day, these imperfections would probably start to drive me crazy. But in regular use--i.e. with multiple windows open, and showing multiple colours--I don't see how anyone would notice this. I certainly can't see how it would result in any major screw-ups in colour-critical work--i.e. preparing photos for print, etc. Suffice to say, I've had to work on far worse displays...
(Just my perspective, of course.)
Edit: thanks for the Photoshop science, Quu! (I actually contemplated doing this myself. )
So your point is valid. It's not a severe shift, but I concede that it's there. The question is, is it a big enough deal for me to want to return it...? Could I really hope to do much better? This screen is already, objectively, miles better than the 17" I had before, and that computer was just as expensive.
I really prefer not to make a hobby of this "display mining" if I can help it, and yet, the 14-day return window makes it all so convenient...
Last edited: