Check out cDock.
I've tried it, but I don't care for tweaking system settings/assets.
Check out cDock.
I've tried it, but I don't care for tweaking system settings/assets.
I hope you're keeping a well annotated list of all these changes in a single, easy to find location.gradually accumulated a long list of tweaks and kludges to bring my brand-new MBP running Yosemite back to looking and working as close...
I got to see Yosemite yesterday on a guy's machine while waiting at the airport. I don't know if it was a developers preview or a bootleg of one of the DP sets. I suppose it doesn't matter.
My conclusion was that some of the new features, once they get them working OK are good, in fact probably an asset.
....but then there are the changes to the user interface. Jonathon Ive said he was going to "pound it down" (the user interface, that is) and he did so...with a sledge hammer.
This is the worst looking version of MacOS I've ever seen in my life. The folder icons are an obnoxious deep turquoise. The Red, yellow, and green window control buttons have no 3D effects and look more like some cheap drawing. Most 3d effects are gone from the title bars of apps. They're all flat and unsophisticated looking. It reminded me of an early version of Linux or maybe something more like Windows 1.0. Many of the icons have been "simplified"...appaarently they were too complicated for us, so now they're being dumbed down with obnoxious, high contrast colors and simpleton diagrams.
THIS IS JUST PLAIN STUPID LOOKING!!!
I've been a loyal fan of Apple for years, but face the facts guys, Steve Jobs is gone and the new head of the company and his "designer" are pretty clueless. The "good 'ol days" of Apple, as in during the '80's are over, and now it's rebirth and re-incarnation of the company by Jobs in the 2000's are over. All the stuff Jobs liked, like the skeuomorphic design of the recently fired Scott Forstall, was what made the early versions of iOS and OS X look great, but Ive apparently got Forstall fired and has been "correcting" first iOS and now OS X.
FYI, CNET did a user rating of Ive's "greatly improved" iOS 7 and it got a 1.5 out 5 stars....all previous versions of iOS (from Jobs/Forstall) had ratings between 4.5 and 5. We obviously won't hear a bad word about Apple from anyone that stands to profit from advertising revenue but I'm afraid user rating tell the real story.
Unless they change Yosemite to appear more like its predecessors, I would give Yosemite a rating of 0.5 out of 5 stars. You really have to see it to get the feel for how butt-ugly and stupid looking it is.
I believe when my current generation of Apple hardware starts going south, the replacements will be non-Apple.
Any ideas for non-Windows alternates? I'm thinking Linux, FreeBSD, etc.
I hope you're keeping a well annotated list of all these changes in a single, easy to find location.
There're few things worse than an update that breaks some essential tweak you put in two years ago, and you can't remember its name, where it came from or how it was installed.
I would urge everyone to go to the CNET user rating site on Yosemite:
http://www.cnet.com/products/mac-os-x-10-10-yosemite/user-reviews/
and enter your opinion there. Maybe somebody at Apple reads that? So far, there are only 6 user reviews.
Judging by what is being said here, there should be a ton of user reviews!
Please do your part!
Thanks,
Etan
For me, the unfortunate thing is that certain system changes like graphics driver updates are in Yosemite thus I do not want to revert to Mavericks. If it were not for certain improvements that could easily have pushed out to Mavericks as point releases, I would still be running that. But no.
What driver updates? Apple doesn't normally update graphic drivers unless something is completely broken. It's part of why gaming has such a bad reputation on the Mac. Apple is more interested in making OSX into iOS than anything constructive these days.
Well, if sending feedback directly to Apple doesn't help I don't see how adding to an old CNET poll that was missed/ignored by very nearly the entire population of Mac users will make any difference.
CNET had a similar user-review for iOS 7, except there were a lot of entries. The overall rating wasn't very good, probably about the equivalent of a a "poor" with most complaining about the appearance.
I find it somewhat interesting that the user ratings seem to correlate with what you see on the Apple App Store reviews. In the U.S. App Store the negativity is actually getting worse as more versions come out. Right now (April 22, 2015) it's showing me:
79 - 5 star
19 - 4 star
26 - 3 star
52 - 2 star
201 - 1 star
I doubt Apple pays any attention to what's on a small CNET review, but I hope they pay attention to what's being reported in their own App Store. This is being consistently reviews as "poor" IMHO.
To shape the future we have to understand the past.
U.S. App Store
79 - 5 star
19 - 4 star
26 - 3 star
52 - 2 star
201 - 1 star
I think Photos is driving these reviews, people can live with ugly but Photos takes dumbing down to new limits.
Trust me, will ignore it.
Surely, this and other threads amount to an avalanche of complaints about Yosemite over several weeks would by now have been noticed by
…
The idea that an industrial designer/artist, who himself has stated that he doesn't know much about operating systems is now running the show is a scary idea. I seriously think he really doesn't understand how people that use computers for real work use the systems.…
I have now added my voice on the apple list. Quite happy with snow leopard.
Topics such as this are not ignored by Apple. But this (in the macrumors.com domain) can't be effective as feedback in the apple.com domain.
...The idea that an industrial designer/artist, who himself has stated that he doesn't know much about operating systems is now running the show is a scary idea. I seriously think he really doesn't understand how people that use computers for real work use the systems...
How can a Retina MBP run Snow Leopard...?