December. Getting chilly, looking forward.
Retrospective
… Apple made a dump on your screen, but that should not come as a surprise for anyone these days.
Before Yosemite, I
never imagined that Apple would develop an operating system in that way for Mac users.
Early encounters were more than
surprising. I was quietly
puzzled and appalled.
Months later, the apparent design direction continued to
puzzle and astound me; I found no reasonable explanation from Apple. I must prefix the following screenshot (menu bar removed) with an important point:
- publication at the time was inappropriate …
Logical approaches to alternatives to Apple operating systems
… Changing entire ecosystems based on a preference that "it doesn't look good" is a frankly stupid. … personal opinion, but the cost of changing (from machines to licenses, old habits, knowledge about programs, workflows), are rarely worth it. …
Egk, you're right to draw people's attention to those costs. Thanks.
Preference-based decision-making would be stupid only if the costs are underestimated.
… astounded by two things:
- That veterans don't take precautions before upgrading (I know, some do)
- Threatening to leave to Windows, or something else
For me it's not a threat. Not a weapon.
It's simply a plan, and there's an orderly, logical approach. Soon – before Yosemite becomes a requirement for this class of hardware – I'll get, from the budget at work,
a new MacBook Pro. Then:
- refrain from starting Yosemite
- install a third party (non-Apple) operating system that will allow me to try a variety of desktop environments with the Retina display
- try a handful of other non-Apple operating systems with the new Apple hardware with the Retina display
- install OS X Yosemite to the internal drive, test it for as long as is tolerable
- erase Yosemite
- install Mavericks
- gradually move away from OS X
- complete that move before Apple ceases to provide security fixes for Mavericks
– Apple has the power to dissuade me from steps 7 and 8.
Specifically: at or before WWDC 2015, I'd like to see an unmistakable change of direction. Not a reversal from Yosemite, just a more flexible approach/direction, with software that can satisfy a broader range of users. Related:
Flavours is of great interest, future
version 2 should make Yosemite more attractive. But if that's followed by nonsense at WWDC, I'll be a step closer to my steps 7 and 8.
Feedback
I do still believe sending feedback to Apple is a good thing, so have at it.
+1 …
make some noise – to Apple.
I'll probably blog some things clearly, early, in 2015. Some of those things may become points of reference in my feedback.
I encourage everyone else to send feedback without delay. One item of feedback per problem with the looks, so if – for example – you're troubled by a
lack of contrast and by
excessive brightness, aim for two submissions (not two types of trouble within the same item of feedback). The separation should make it easier for Apple to classify and prioritise whatever is submitted through its public feedback form.
… is this a maneuver to force hardware updates? …
I doubt that was Apple's intention.
Why it's not OK to show/discuss pre-release software in public: an example
As things turned out, what's in the screenshot above was probably simply a bug. Only
probable; I can never be certain because I did not bother to send feedback. My loss. I
made some noise, in public, that was almost entirely unjustifiable. When I realised the probability of it being a bug I was quietly embarrassed (lessons learnt – better respect for agreements with Apple, and so on) but I didn't draw attention at the time. Now, I don't mind people knowing about the embarrassment.