I'd like to see Apple offer a 32-inch standalone display, with no camera and no speakers (and especially no rounded corners and no notch!), in the same lineup as their non-Pro displays.
Would you be happy to pay $1,799 for that? Same price point as the 2020 iMac 27" 5K base model?Will be good to also have a non Pro 32" iMac with a base version of M chip with a much lower price tag.
You have to remember that Apple is a small company with a limited number of developers!2025? What is taking so long for a larger iMac?
No way I'd do that, that'd cost twice as much. The Studio Display costs to much for just a monitor.For those calling for a 27” form factor - grab an Apple Studio Display and the computer of your choice
I disagree30 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
36 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
I repeat:
30 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
36 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
Apple please take note:
30 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
36 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
I disagree
40 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
46 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
I repeat:
40 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
46 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
Apple please take note:
40 inch is the perfect size for 5K.
46 inch is the perfect size for 6K.
It’s still is... a starting size for bedrooms or minimalist small apartment.It's huge! 32 inches was a proper TV size not too long ago.
Yes it costs more now, but you can keep using the display after this computer is obsolete. With an iMac, the display is wasted (unless converted into a standalone display of course).No way I'd do that, that'd cost twice as much. The Studio Display costs to much for just a monitor.
32" was my 1st LCD TV from 2004.It’s still is... a starting size for bedrooms or minimalist small apartment.
Why would they do something that can limit sales. They need to make a bigger profit every year. Better for profits to force people into buying a new displayI have been a long time fan of the iMac, and still own a G3, G4, and many Intel iMacs, but I will most likely not be purchasing another one.
Apple should bring back Target Display Mode for the iMacs, so once the performance no longer meets the needs of the user, the display can still be used for another Mac.
I wonder how many iMacs with perfectly working, beautiful displays are thrown away or recycled because the user needs something faster?
Can’t you use Sidecar from Apple, or 3rd party options like Duet Display, the $99 Luna dongle, etc.?If Apple wasnt a scumbag company they'd do the right thing and at least let users have the option of using the computer as a display only.
Too much to ask for, Apparently.
The fact that the Mini can now be optioned with an M2-Pro makes me think there will me an M3-Pro iMac option.I hope they drop the "pro" ******** and offer it in colors. I don't want a $10,000 iMac. I just want an M3 (maybe an M3 "Pro") with a reasonably sized (for 2024) screen. And I want it in blue.
Just because Apple might term something obsolete doesn't make it useless.Yes it costs more now, but you can keep using the display after this computer is obsolete. With an iMac, the display is wasted (unless converted into a standalone display of course).
You can, and I do, that with my 2020 27" intel iMac, and it's good for productivity stuff. A bit too much latency for entertainment or gaming though. I mostly use my iMac standalone, even though I have a faster AS Mac sitting beside me. I really like the iMac, great display, great machine.Can’t you use Sidecar from Apple, or 3rd party options like Duet Display, the $99 Luna dongle, etc.?
Maybe for the Mac enthusiasts that post here. But I suspect that 900 days ago, the clear majority of iMac owners saw it as an upgrade from their 21.5” iMac.901 days since an update, which bought us a decreased screen size and resolution
As someone with an actual need (HDR and imaging workflow) for an extended (read: multi-display) workspace, I couldn't agree more with you on 32" being a sweet spot (PPI-wise) for 6K, or even 7K (and, I'll toss-in, 8K sweet spot at 38–42").I use a 32 as my main display with a pair of 27s flanking, I could never go back to 27 as my main display, too small! 32 seems about perfect for desktop use to me now, I just wish the higher res ones would drop in price. 6k is currently the sweet spot for 32” and scaling to practical QHD, but they’re still super expensive. My current display is UHD and to get the same scaling you’d have to run it at a practical 1080p, which is not super usable to me. When 6k 32” displays come down in price I’ll jump in a heartbeat
It's important to be aware that the global community is in a desperate rush to get greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under control, and that consumer electronic devices are currently under stricter energy efficiency rules in the EU and elsewhere, and to expect there to be global energy efficiency standards in relatively short order. Electronics manufacturers are scrambling to develop those low-energy products lest they find themselves no longer able to participate in the global marketplace...Jeez, even Mini LED keeps getting pushed back year after year, Micro LED seems like a unicorn that's never going to arrive at all.