Copilot is a far less insufferable and misleading name.Apple Intelligence is the entire package. Just like ChatGPT is not GPT. Microsoft calls it Co-Pilot, are they also "stealing" something here?
Copilot is a far less insufferable and misleading name.Apple Intelligence is the entire package. Just like ChatGPT is not GPT. Microsoft calls it Co-Pilot, are they also "stealing" something here?
Plus, by the time competent Siri launches, alongside all the other AI stuff, there will be a new family of iPhones to buy.The iPhone 4S was the only device that had Siri when it launched, and it had no backwards compatibility at all. They still sold 60 million of them.
I was thinking about maybe waiting for the iPhone 17, but this looks good enough.I am so sad.
Right, so Apple bought P.A. Semiconductor for $250 million because they needed someone to order a bunch of specs. Your ignorance here is ASTOUNDING.What you’re describing is more akin to what fabs do. Apple does easier, high-level stuff like core count, core size, etc. it’s not hard to list a spec sheet.
In our analogy, Apple would be the customer picking the size and the toppings with barely any technical know-how (Which anyone can do) while the fab works on the harder, intricate details of the pizza.
Not really, there is a reason why Microsoft requires all windows copilot+ PCs to have minimum 45 TOPs and 16GB RAM to enable similar features. A17 Pro has 35 TOPS vs A16 17 TOPS, A15 15.8 TOPS. But also equally important is RAM, iPhone 15 Pro has 8GB of RAM, devices below that have just 6GB. They are trying to do as much on device as possible.They want this to be the future but they also want to make sure that most people today can't use it. That's wild.
They even mentioned the ability to use cloud processing which makes this argument doubly ridiculous. You can bet that even on the latest A17 devices it'll be reaching out to the cloud a lot, and probably not much more than it would be on A16 and A15. But even if some queries may take twice as long on my A15 as a brand new A17 due to having slower on-chip processing, who cares honestly, as long as it works...That's like claiming anything that's a GPU can pump out 4k visuals.
Unreleased software updates instantly make existing hardware useless! Are you new here? Someone’s 14 Pro just became as useless as an XR based on an earlier message!Or...they still work the way they do today, which you seemed to be happy about before. 🤔
I find it highly suspicous that only the A17 Pro and above can handle it. Considering the M1 chips are based on the A14 IIRC. But expanded for traditional computing use.I am so sad.
View attachment 2386933
Yeah no kidding -- if that feature means that much to you, just upgrade this fall. I feel like the non-pro iPhone 16 will have this capability because they want it across all of their new family of devices this year.Unreleased software updates instantly make existing hardware useless! Are you new here? Someone’s 14 Pro just became as useless as an XR based on an earlier message!
Us Apple users are a salty bunch, it seems.![]()
I agree! It is pathetic that Apple isn't at least supporting iPhone 13/14 and later.I find it highly suspicous that only the A17 Pro and above can handle it. Considering the M1 is based on the A14 IIRC
Oh, there's no technical feat involved with rewriting an OS to run on ARM? The only one that seems to be hurting form the truth here is you...but you want it to somehow hurt someone else.Integrating ARM processors isn’t a technical feat. Windows needs to consider legacy software while Apple doesn’t. It is easier for a far less popular platform with far less 3rd party support to break compatibility with legacy software by moving architectures than it is a mainstream platform with 10000000X support.
Apple Silicon is a TSMC technical achievement, not Apple. Apple is a repackager that can’t engineer themselves out of a plastic bag. Truth hurts.
Apple’s history and business model is about being popular and having high sales volume to get good deals from suppliers. They don’t actually develop any of the technology they use in their products.
Shame on you, Apple. My iPhone 14 Pro Max, which I purchased just one year ago, no longer supports Apple Intelligence. It's disappointing that the "most advanced iPhone ever" from just one year ago has the same software capabilities as an iPhone XR from 2018.
They want this to be the future but they also want to make sure that most people today can't use it. That's wild.
Yet, they didn't name it "ChatGPT for Windows, M365, Azure, etc.". The only thing insufferable here is how upset you are over Apple's branding of THEIR product.Copilot is a far less insufferable and misleading name.
The chat GPT integration and Apple Intelligence are completely different. And Apple did do the work on Apple Intelligence, making it far more useful than just making a chat bot. There’s no misleading here.It’s not selling out. It’s just ChatGPT letting Apple use their technology on their OS. It has zilch to do with any technical or innovative work on Apple’s end. My issue is that they’re lying by omission and pretending they did the inventing.
The name “Apple Intelligence” is so insufferable and blatantly misleading.
My guess is that Siri gets the visual update across the OS, but what types of requests it can handle depend on the hardware.How exactly will this work? If you have a device that isn’t supported iOS 18 and macOS Sequoia just don’t surface it to you? You get the existing Siri interface?
I'll say this as nicely as I can: stop embarrassing yourself. We're not laughing with you, just so you know.Integrating ARM processors isn’t a technical feat. Windows needs to consider legacy software while Apple doesn’t. It is easier for a far less popular platform with far less 3rd party support to break compatibility with legacy software by moving architectures than it is a mainstream platform with 10000000X support.
Apple Silicon is a TSMC technical achievement, not Apple. Apple is a repackager that can’t engineer themselves out of a plastic bag. Truth hurts.
Apple’s history and business model is about being popular and having high sales volume to get good deals from suppliers. They don’t actually develop any of the technology they use in their products.
Sorry to disappoint you, but their Apple Intelligence does not more on-device than Samsung's Advanced Intelligence does. Apple is just pretending to do more than the others. It is mostly a copy of Samsung features anyway.As far as I know they’re the only ones doing it mostly on device without sharing your personal data to subsidize the cost for “free” or for advertising purposes. Once again, with Apple you’re NOT the product.
They deserve a lot of credit for that.