how is this different than 90% of the OSes we've gone thru since around 10.4? each new OS is a build upon the previous, with new features, GUI changes, etc.
but what always interests me most is what's happening under the hood, my main reason to update regularly. and yes, some things are ugly (i still vote for the stickies icon as 'ugliest ever', even with the new icon).
I hear you, and while you are correct, the main difference between tiger and newer was the PowerPC to Intel transition.
With this said, It was still possible to run most PPC apps through Rosetta, so that didn't take away from software that could run. With the Intel to ARM Transition, that will still be possible with Rosetta 2. That I understand. My main question is, for current Intel users, will there really be any big changes to upgrade for outside the UI, it looks to me most of the changes are for ARM macs, meaning it would be a bigger benefit to get new hardware first. An example here is, I am looking forward to running some of the apps I use, on the iPad, and Phone, on the Mac, however, this will not fully be possible unless I get a whole new computer, and while I may do so in a few more years, right now, it's not worth the cost, and time, and it sounds like, as I said, while I like the new interface, beyond that I won't be getting much outside of that over what I already have on my current iMac.