Hi! Someone can correct me if I'm wrong but that part of the board is for grounding, and no important traces can be found there, so it should still work.You have to laugh I guess... After weeks and weeks of waiting I finally got a bill - £37.72 for customs - not ideal and certainly makes the overall cost a lot more expensive, but at least it would finally be delivered.
Today it arrived and... the box was severely beaten up and the card has a bent corner. I don't know if this works yet - I don't have time to try it until the weekend but it's fair to say I'm a little disappointed. I'll have to bend the board back into shape with some pliers and hope that there's nothing important in that part (I don't think there is but I'm no expert). Seems clear to me that this package was not treated well at all so if the board survived is anyone's guess.
If you post some details of both sides, you give people a chance to check.You have to laugh I guess... After weeks and weeks of waiting I finally got a bill - £37.72 for customs - not ideal and certainly makes the overall cost a lot more expensive, but at least it would finally be delivered.
Today it arrived and... the box was severely beaten up and the card has a bent corner. I don't know if this works yet - I don't have time to try it until the weekend but it's fair to say I'm a little disappointed. I'll have to bend the board back into shape with some pliers and hope that there's nothing important in that part (I don't think there is but I'm no expert). Seems clear to me that this package was not treated well at all so if the board survived is anyone's guess.
View attachment 2255245
View attachment 2253567
Neoprene Backing
Thanks for the information, it seems to be working just fine so I'll just go with the flow. I haven't changed any colour settings using the boards controls at all yet - it looks really nice already so I'll probably just leave it until I start doing some things that need colour accuracy - that might push me into looking into it further.Hi, glad its looking good
The way Apple does 'Retina' is to make the pixels tiny (5K) and the set a 'Default' resolution to use 4 of the tiny screen pixels to make 1 display pixel that your eyes see. The call it HiDPI.
So what you see at the Default resolution is normal.
True Tone probably needs Apple-specific sensors in the screen, so not available AFAIK.
Night Shift is dealt with by the Mac, so the button you show in your System Settings should work.
It does on my DIY monitor.
I would encourage you to give it a go, I have no expertise at all but was able to muddle through quite easily. I thought it would be complex but it really wasn't. Main tips are to get a little cutter wheel tool to separate the screen from the iMac and to be really careful with the screen and also really careful around the iMac power supply as that could be dangerous if you're not. That aside it's pretty simply really. Gut the iMac, screw the new display board inside and connect it up.Its a shame there is no legal way to pay somebody to do this for me (I don't have the time, or the expertise); what a waste of a good panel.
Not sure what you mean by "legal way"… there is nothing illegal about this process. You could pay a local technician to do the work; it's just that Apple Authorized Service Providers may NOT do it, due to contractual limitations imposed by Apple on the kind of work they are/are not allowed to do. But that doesn't make this kind of project "illegal"; you own the iMac, you or anyone you contract with (sans AASPs) are free to do with its guts as you see fit, even transplant 3rd-party parts.Its a shame there is no legal way to pay somebody to do this for me (I don't have the time, or the expertise); what a waste of a good panel.
This is interesting - thanks!Not sure what you mean by "legal way"… there is nothing illegal about this process. You could pay a local technician to do the work; it's just that Apple Authorized Service Providers may NOT do it, due to contractual limitations imposed by Apple on the kind of work they are/are not allowed to do. But that doesn't make this kind of project "illegal"; you own the iMac, you or anyone you contract with (sans AASPs) are free to do with its guts as you see fit, even transplant 3rd-party parts.
(Which, yes, I feel such limitations should not be "legal" for Apple to impose on its 3rd party technicians, it isn't "fair" to limit the scope of their business… however that's contract law for you. My understanding is that AASPs are not even allowed to permit non-AASP-certified technicians employed at the business to work on Apple equipment at all, to do this kind of thing; they'd lose their AASP status. Which is gross. There is a world of difference between fraudulently having non-certified techs doing work and saying it is "Apple official repair", and having non-certified techs doing non-Apple-approved work on Apple gear that the customer requests. My local AASP won't even install non-Apple parts—SSDs—into Vintage and Obsolete iMacs; they will, however, open and subsequently close an iMac, "officially". But folks like Louis Rossmann could absolutely make a side-hustle out of retro-fitting used 5K iMacs should they choose.)
Not sure what you mean by "legal way"… there is nothing illegal about this process. You could pay a local technician to do the work; it's just that Apple Authorized Service Providers may NOT do it, due to contractual limitations imposed by Apple on the kind of work they are/are not allowed to do. But that doesn't make this kind of project "illegal"; you own the iMac, you or anyone you contract with (sans AASPs) are free to do with its guts as you see fit, even transplant 3rd-party parts.
(Which, yes, I feel such limitations should not be "legal" for Apple to impose on its 3rd party technicians, it isn't "fair" to limit the scope of their business… however that's contract law for you. My understanding is that AASPs are not even allowed to permit non-AASP-certified technicians employed at the business to work on Apple equipment at all, to do this kind of thing; they'd lose their AASP status. Which is gross. There is a world of difference between fraudulently having non-certified techs doing work and saying it is "Apple official repair", and having non-certified techs doing non-Apple-approved work on Apple gear that the customer requests. My local AASP won't even install non-Apple parts—SSDs—into Vintage and Obsolete iMacs; they will, however, open and subsequently close an iMac, "officially". But folks like Louis Rossmann could absolutely make a side-hustle out of retro-fitting used 5K iMacs should they choose.)
The most important thing Ive just learnt from experience is the condition of the panel. Unfortunately as I purchased my 2015 iMac on eBay I did not get to test the panel first. My panel, unfortunately, has the pink around the edges issue. The issue is quite well documented (there's threads on MacRumors - https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/2015-27-imac-has-pink-edges-anyone-else.2178372/ and https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/2015-27-imac-pink-edges.2382083/ for example) but I'd never heard of it until I experienced it.I'm pricing out a conversion, and it looks like it might be easier to get a deal on a Late 2014 iMac over a Late 2015. How much of a difference is there between the two screens in practice? The main use case is web development and casual photo editing.
It seems like I might not get much when I go to resell the logic board unless the machine is top spec, although the Late 2015 is at least Intel Skylake, so I would expect it to be a bit easier to sell than the 2014 which is Haswell. Everything else being equal, how much of a discount should I place on the Late 2014/Mid 2015 iMacs vs the Late 2015?