Can't speak to China, but I have heard the U.S. is that way because of Verizon and Sprint. The Snapdragon has CDMA network support built in. Exynos doesn't and would require an extra bit of hardware, thus more cost.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Galaxy S7
- Thread starter nviz22
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
But they did it last year heat issues aside. Samsung could sell more phones if they made a one size fit all method. Fully unlocked device with no bootloader issues. Perfect for development and avoiding carriers, so that can make up for rising hardware and software costs.
Not only that, but if they did only sell one version in all countries then updates would be much easier. I've always wondered why apple is the only one who can do this, you would think other companies would do this to save money on support and r&d.
Even Apple does not fully embrace this concept though. They often have to source components from more than one manufacturer in order to have enough supply. I also think they have had to vary the hardware a bit over the years to accommodate different carrier frequencies in different countries. More similar than different to be sure. But still not a "one size for all" approach out of necessity.
I thought the only variants are the chinese model and sprint, and that the rest were the same?
I didn't see anything specifically asserting this but my guess is that Samsung came to an agreement with Qualcomm to use the 820 in some variants as part of the deal to do its fabrication.
The ATT variant is different this year. It supports band 30 and the other models do not.
I don't think they can do it right now. Even now my understanding is at least for the us there's little or no after sales support for unlocked s7s and Samsung pay does not work. They right now still feel like they need the carriers hence the carrier variants and carrier bloat. Even Apple needs the carriers to a degree.
the rest of the world relies on GSM,
only on verizon and sprint does samsung need a cdma capable chip
So I got a very good deal on brand new GS7 and bought it again. Was hoping for black color this time but I guess gold isn't bad either.
Surprisingly the finger print scanner works better than my first S7.
Any good screen protector recommendation for S7 flat? I've tried the Nilkin tempered glass before and it was really bad.
Surprisingly the finger print scanner works better than my first S7.
Any good screen protector recommendation for S7 flat? I've tried the Nilkin tempered glass before and it was really bad.
Got the AT&T update last night. Only noticed two things... one is the display is less sensitive which is great. Before I would get all kinds of 'false' presses by just grabbing the phone. It was so sensitive I could actually launch apps and stuff without even touching the screen. The other thing is they have dimmed the Always On Display. It's barely visible now and useless. I would not mind or care if it was like that when carrying it (off the charger) but I got used to looking at it for the time. Now I can't see it because it's just too dim. Useless now. Oh well.
How much did you sell your old one? My Nexus 5X came in and I decided to run its paces for what an Android phone means for my daily driver. I am closing on a S7 Edge for $600 brand new in Gold myself. Leaning towards the S7 Edge so far, but the Nexus needs a fair evaluation now that I have an opportunity to give it since I hardly used my last one before I returned it.
You looking at buying the international variant or something?
Not sure exactly why but Samsung pay will definitely not work
Not looking at all but have seen many assume that if an unlocked version was actually sold by Samsung here that it wouldn't work. Does look like using an international variant here in the US means Samsung Pay doesn't work. My confusion is why? When Apple Pay was first released, it wasn't available in the Canada but I don't believe this restriction was device specific but rather dictated by region, meaingn if I bought an unlocked model from somewhere in Canada, I could set up Apple Pay for use in the US, as long as I was using a US based credit card. Maybe, I'm wrong but that's I remember it.
Around $500.
$600 for S7 edge is good deal, but edge is to big for me as I prefer smaller phone for one handed operation.
One hand operating mode works on the Edge too! But I get it and respect it. Did you buy it off that eBay deal two days ago? I didn't bite on a $500 cost for the regular S7. Preferred the ergonomics of the Edge.
I mean handling the phone using one hand, not the triple click home one-hand feature. Tbh, even flat S7 is a little big for me lol
No, I bought it from someone who got it as present but didn't wanna use it. If you don't mind the size, edge if definitely the better device.
If the S7 is too big, you can always go with the iPhone SE or LG G5 SE/ Galaxy S7 Mini at some point?
I'm using it alongside iPhone SE. For me, the perfect phone size is iPhone 6S, but I can go as small as iPhone SE and as big as flat S7.
my hunch would be that they tied it to snapdragon, I believe only the US got snapdragon?
it would seem to be on purpose , samsung seems to try to hamper grey market imports, maybe at the command of US carriers - since that is the only real sanctioned way to buy one here. perhaps it is about the locked bootloader on snapdragon? samsung doesnt want people with unlockable exynos fiddling with samsung pay looking for vulnerabilities? who knows, but IMO it is intentional
apples use of the secure enclave for apple pay is more ideal for security. jailbreaking has no effect on its use. Maybe samsung was too scared to lock the whole world down? It's hard for me to believe they still care about leaving it open, but if they werent going to offer samsung pay worldwide as the tradeoff.. maybe it would indeed piss enough geeks off
Just throwing it out there, who knows
my hunch would be that they tied it to snapdragon, I believe only the US got snapdragon?
it would seem to be on purpose , samsung seems to try to hamper grey market imports, maybe at the command of US carriers - since that is the only real sanctioned way to buy one here. perhaps it is about the locked bootloader on snapdragon? samsung doesnt want people with unlockable exynos fiddling with samsung pay looking for vulnerabilities? who knows, but IMO it is intentional
apples use of the secure enclave for apple pay is more ideal for security. jailbreaking has no effect on its use. Maybe samsung was too scared to lock the whole world down? It's hard for me to believe they still care about leaving it open, but if they werent going to offer samsung pay worldwide as the tradeoff.. maybe it would indeed piss enough geeks off
Just throwing it out there, who knows
Yup, who know but certainly a possible reason.
I haven't checked but has Google locked down Android Pay to only specific regions?
I believe that is a yes, but there should be no trouble bringing a device from a different country and using it in one with android pay. I wager it is like Apple Pay