sometimes it's just a CPU bump... get over it. it was already the best product on the market.
I think this year will either drive people to keep devices much longer or try Android though. Prices have remained static from other manufacturers who chose to absorb the inflationary increases and retailers are promoting this at the moment. I prefer iOS personally and have been an iPhone user for over a decade, but I am realistic that I may be priced out in the coming years as prices soar. Buying used isn’t ideal for everybody if you want a warranty and it’s a sad state of affairs to have to do this when you’ve enjoyed years of buying the latest hardware. If Apple don’t want customers who want a £700-£950 smartphone and favour the silly high end of the market going forward, then I think that might encourage consumers to shift focus. This might be what we need to happen in order for products to remain competitive.
Simple. IPads require higher watt chargers that fewer people are already likely to have on hand.Just to add to this thread.....
Whyyyyy do you get a charger (not that I am knocking this) with the £369 iPad, but not with a £1k+ iPhone.....?
What is the logic....
Yes, people have many options, including looking at other tablet manufacturers if they want to see if Android works for them. Doesn't buying used still have a warranty if it's within the standard warranty period or still under Apple Care? And of course buying certified refurbished comes with its own warranty from Apple at the time of purchase. Both are very viable options if one can't afford a brand new Apple product.
Having "enjoyed years of buying the latest hardware" is a luxury that most people can't afford, so I have a hard time feeling sorry for someone who isn't able to do so now or doesn't feel it's worth it now. That's sort of like trying to feel pity for someone who's been driving a $200,000 car and now has to drive an $80,000 one
Not sure why you call the high end market "silly"--remember, a market is made up of consumers, so you're really calling those consumers "silly". Why are they silly? Apple is going to go where the money is. They have a wide range of products in most categories, though, so I really don't see the issue. These are all very nice products.
But you are correct, if people en masse stop buying certain Apple products, things will change due to basic economic principles. But I really don't see that happening. It seems most people still find them worth the price.
Please don’t pity me, I wasn’t asking for that. I don’t buy the top of the line hardware anymore, but I did like buying the latest iPhones and iPads until this year. If they are too expensive, I don’t mind annoying people here with my complaints though. I say silly prices because they’ve all jumped up at least £100, even older devices have seen a significant increase in the last few weeks to what they were before. I didn’t mention anything about consumers being silly, not sure how you twisted it to that to be honest? Anyway, I think we’ll just go around in circles in this so let’s just never cross paths on here again, deal? All the best.
If Apple don’t want customers who want a £700-£950 smartphone and favour the silly high end of the market going forward
After the iPad ‘updates’,
price bumps
and what seems to be a deliberate manipulation by Apple to push people to more expensive devices (again) by gimping and purposely making thing less user friendly
I agree that there is a lot of value in Apple's entry level products. You usually get about 90% of the user experience for less than half the cost of the high end.Apple has been doing what you've observed for years.
As for leaving the ecosystem, I've done it... but that doesn't require ditching Apple hardware. I still have my 2013 and 2017 iMacs (the 2013 serves as my Plex server and 2nd monitor to my 2017 iMac). I have an iPad Mini 5, iPad 9th gen, and iPhone SE 2.
That's the key these days, IMO. Forget the FOMO (fear of missing out) of not having quad speakers, pro-motion, etc. and go for the entry level products. The iPhone SE and base iPad offer some of the best tech bargains available.
I have chromebooks, Windows laptops, Android tablets, and countless other devices in my regular mix, and these Apple products work well together. As a result, I have spent far less for far more tech than those who are all-in on Apple's top tier products and services.
But that's me... I'm a bit of an oddball. But if you'd like to get into the details of how something like this can work for you, I (and others in similar situations) would be happy to help.
Examples?
Edit: and please don‘t just quote spec differences as that is how all manufacturers differentiate their product lines. Just examples where a lower-end Apple device is less user friendly by something Apple purposely „gimped“.
I agree that there is a lot of value in Apple's entry level products. You usually get about 90% of the user experience for less than half the cost of the high end.
For $2135 MSRP, you can get an iPad, iPhone, AirPods, Apple Watch, and MacBook, all new from apple. If you shop apple refurb (indistinguishable from new, IMO) or wait for sales, you can save hundreds more. (If you bought during that recent Amazon sale, you could’ve gotten all that for about $300 less, I think.) yes, you’d be getting some older designs and no cutting edge features. But every one of those devices would run its current OS and several more generations (at least) quickly and smoothly and would do everything most users need flawlessly.
So I just don’t buy that apple has become unaffordable. The crazy jacked up prices are for the people who want the cutting edge, but they’re totally unnecessary for most users. If you want to pay twice as much for a handful of “nice to have” comfort features, that’s on you. (I say this as the owner of an iPad Pro who would be just fine with a base model iPad)
I generally agree (the retina display made it into the MacBook Air, and the base M1 is an absolute screamer for performance. Apple does frequently add their best innovations across the entire lineup). But there are a few exceptions where I feel like Apple did artificially cap certain things. The multi-monitor support on the base 13" M1 MBP is one such example. With the M1 having 16 billion transistors (and a GPU many times more powerful than the Intel GPUs), there is no reason Apple could not have designed the M1 to physically support two display output streams like the much smaller Intel processors could. Instead, we have a situation where the 13" Intel could support this, but you have to upgrade to the 14" on the M1 lineup to do the same.I agree that there is a lot of value in Apple's entry level products. You usually get about 90% of the user experience for less than half the cost of the high end.
For $2135 MSRP, you can get an iPad, iPhone, AirPods, Apple Watch, and MacBook, all new from apple. If you shop apple refurb (indistinguishable from new, IMO) or wait for sales, you can save hundreds more. (If you bought during that recent Amazon sale, you could’ve gotten all that for about $300 less, I think.) yes, you’d be getting some older designs and no cutting edge features. But every one of those devices would run its current OS and several more generations (at least) quickly and smoothly and would do everything most users need flawlessly.
So I just don’t buy that apple has become unaffordable. The crazy jacked up prices are for the people who want the cutting edge, but they’re totally unnecessary for most users. If you want to pay twice as much for a handful of “nice to have” comfort features, that’s on you. (I say this as the owner of an iPad Pro who would be just fine with a base model iPad)
I honestly think the main issue is that Apple doesn’t reduce prices over time as the tech ages, as many companies do. Raising the price of the new pro, however painful, makes sense with the economic situation. Raising the price for the 9 is what feels really wrong. Of course they can. Of course it costs more to make as prices fluctuate. But it should have been steadily reducing before, so that leaving it at a lower stable price would have been an option. I do understand why they’ve done it, but I think it’s a slap in the face to consumers and possibly a poor PR move.
I agree with you about the multi display support on M1. Can’t be justified. And, clearly there are some users who need more than base models (especially with Macs).I generally agree (the retina display made it into the MacBook Air, and the base M1 is an absolute screamer for performance. Apple does frequently add their best innovations across the entire lineup). But there are a few exceptions where I feel like Apple did artificially cap certain things. The multi-monitor support on the base 13" M1 MBP is one such example. With the M1 having 16 billion transistors (and a GPU many times more powerful than the Intel GPUs), there is no reason Apple could not have designed the M1 to physically support two display output streams like the much smaller Intel processors could. Instead, we have a situation where the 13" Intel could support this, but you have to upgrade to the 14" on the M1 lineup to do the same.
It's often certain features we take for granted that sometimes get omitted. I could get a 14" if I want to, but I genuinely love the size and the battery life of the 13" (I travel a lot, and the regular m1 is fast enough for me). It sort of puts me in an awkward situation as a user where I would have to upgrade to a laptop I like less just to do something fairly simple, so I end up using just one external monitor at my work desk instead. Definitely first world problems (it's an amazing machine, I definitely will not complain), it's just weird that the support was omitted.
Yea the M1 MacBook air remains an absolute steal. $999 was already an insanely good price for that level of performance, and now it's frequently going on sale for $800-900. Nobody can compete for that price.I’m just saying that, on the whole, there is pretty good value in Apple’s base models. It’s not a situation where the low end products are just to get you in the door, but are actually laggy, buggy crap that nobody would want to use. Apple’s low end products provide many years of software support and fast, stable user experiences that are remarkably similar to what you get with the high end models that cost 2-3x as much.
I absolutely agree. There are excellent products coming from other companies. And some products that Apple sold in years past are not too shabby either.My perspective is the value of an iPad has always been the same. What may have changed for you is that the price Apple is requesting for these devices are no longer in-line with how you perceive them to be. Sales numbers will reflect that if that is the case for the general population as well.
For me personally, the price of the current iPad line-up is not reflective of what I feel they are worth, hence I am not spending any money on them. In contrast, when I purchased my M1 iMac it was because I felt the value proposition was in my favour — and its helped me generate a lot more income since.
In terms of leaving the ecosystem, I feel you are taking an all-or-nothing approach. You don’t have to be tied to only one company and it’s healthy to try other products. Despite what Apple will have you believe not everything coming out of other companies is utter rubbish.
I have contemplated the same thing many times, and at the moment, I am more all in on Apple than ever. The Apple One subscription really helped seal me in. My kids use hand me down iPads, and they have their own iCloud accounts and can use Arcade, Music, and watch our purchased movie content.So, how tricky would it be to leave the eco system behind and replace products and services while keeping maximum usability?
Some obvious ones would be switching to Google, who do phones, smartwatches and soon a new tablet - but for example replacing my MacBook Air m2…a surface pro? A Chromebook? An XPS?
YouTube Music, Spotify, Google Drive, Dropbox, HomePods, Google Nest Audio…
OP is correct and so are you. The nickel and diming / penny pinching is an incredibly cheap tactic. You’re right, it has been brewing for a while and this week's releases and stories have sort of lit a match. Read any forum anywhere and it’s overwhelming how this sentiment persists. I don’t know where it goes from here but the worlds first trillion dollar company shouldn’t be acting like this. Convoluted product lineup, nickel and dime tactics, cheap strategies that a first year business student can see through.It’s been slowly brewing and I feel like this year they finally pushed it too far, especially in Europe.
Ironically, all the penny pinching and squeezing makes the brand seem cheaper. Why? Because I am losing trust in Apple.
It might go the way of automobiles, where extensive updates take place every 3-4 years and the years in between are more incremental (like we've seen between the iPhone 13 and the iPhone 14).Hypothesis: Mature product lines don’t need earth shattering updates every year in order to justify themselves.
Someone upgrading from the oldest gen iPad Pro is getting a HUGE upgrade here. I would say even someone going from a 2018 model to an M2 will notice the benefits. Beyond that, you do you but you’ll see diminishing returns.
Isn’t this just common sense when shopping for tech? The are years you’ll be interested in upgrading and years you won’t. Right?