gkarris said:
Don't take it personally - it's all a moot point now. Macs do Windows...
It is irrelevant, strictly speaking PCs do MacOS too. The only thing stopping them is the
Big Brother chip that comes in all intel macs.
yellow said:
So I'll fall back on another tactic. No matter how cheaply I can buy a Dell, it still won't run OS X. How's that for a smoke screen?
So? What's so great about OS X?
Hey, while I like it but I have to admit it is not all that great either. UI performance on MacOS plain sucks, Windows is so much snappier. Finder sucks donkey balls. Page file performance on MacOS is slow like molasses. Heck, Firefox would routinely beachball for minutes when I try to switch to some obscure tab that was opened yesterday, I have 2GB of ram on my Mini. Such a thing would never happen on my Celeron XP box. with only 1GB of ram.
Ultimately, I like spotlight. I like the unixy styled pref files. I hate Windows registry. I hate Mac's "wide" software support. I hate Mac's finder. I like the way MacOS escalates application priviledges accordingly. I hate how Windows runs everything as administrator by default. I hate how Windows has no elegant solution to basically
sudo like in MacOS. I love Window's software support. But most importantly, I hate Mac's lack of choice.
You know this myth about how "most people" don't open their computers to upgrade it? Here's a clue, they actually do. In fact even poor people do that (duh) for obvious reasons. And if they can't do it themselves they will upgrade it.
*NOBODY* that I know of would just throw the old machine out wholesale and buy a new replacement, apart from Mac users.
Anyway for anyone else who ran through my list above, Windows Vista will effectively take away a lot of the current Windows caveats, but I am not really sure what Leopard is going to add on for Mac OS. If you ask me it jolly well comes with one hell of a UI upgrade for finder, because from what I see Windows Explorer in Vista totally blows everything on MacOS out of the water.
dejo said:
But you are comparing a consumer laptop with a professional laptop. That is why it's called the MacBook Pro.
Oh really?
I will let you know what happens next time I bring a Macbook
Pro out into the Amazon together with my
Pro EOS 1-DS.
dejo said:
Then you should also consider Apple educational discounts and such.
Educational customers are not
pros. Next fanboy please!
yellow said:
I think it's a stretch to hide under the "fair use" portion of copyright law just to install OS X on a PC. I seriously doubt that 95% of those that do it are critiquing/criticizing/commenting on OS X.
Personally, I believe Apple put in the line "This License allows you to install and use one copy of the Mac OS X software on a single Apple-labeled computer at a time." for a reason.
Blah blah blah.
Since when does being a Mac user grants one the license to be an arm chair lawyer? Ok, so this guy openly admits to using a Hackintosh at home. What is Apple going to do about it? It is illegal, it is against terms of the EULA, etc etc etc.
Nobody cares.
Until Apple subpeonas MR to pull the identity of that poster and actually serves him, it is absolutely irrelevant to the rest of us. Last I check Windows is working very hard with WGA to keep people from
stealing from them too. After all we all know poor Billy is struggling his way through life and can barely afford to buy bare necessities in his multi billion dollar high tech mansion.