The thing is, people are talking about the iPad as if it shouldnt exist. I find it mind blowing. I always here the same “niche” users talking about the iPad as failure because it doesnt run Final Cut pro or some other niche app. I’m thinking, do you actually know how many Final Cut Pro users are actually out there? Do you really think sales would go through the roof on IPads because Final Cut Pro would run on it?
Its a very small percentage of the population that run these apps. Microsoft Office was the most significant software release ever on the Ipad if we are talking about sales boosts. Other than that, the market has spoken. Apple releasing FCP on the iPad will not make a whole load of niche pro app developers immediately rush to port other pro apps. If they haven’t done it by now, they aren’t doing it.
And they aren’t doing it for various reasons. Most of all, the users they want to sell to who will spend hundreds of dollars on one app for work are primarily computer based and rely on computer based workflows. Any pro users uses multiple tools along with their main product. They all need to be there too. They may also rely on multiple drives, monitors etc.. So who will these pro app sellers sell their software to if they put in on the iPad pro?
And that brings us to the main reason. Kind of innovators dilemma. Ableton cant sell Live for 300 dollars+ on an iPad. No one would spend that amount. iOS prices are not Mac prices. So what would be the point? There are only so many users who would want that niche app. So they would be losing tons of money by making an iPad version. It’s the same for many pro apps.
If Apple makes FCP for iPad Pro it will be a marketing exercise rather than some true attempt to move everyone over to the iPad. And the reality is if you buy a MacBook Air instead of an iPad Pro then Apple is very happy to sell you that instead. The house still wins!
The IPad sells more units than the mac. I think they 17m ipads in q4 2021 vs 7m macs. We also know that some customers are never going to spend more than 400 dollars for a machine. So the Mac can never replace the units sold by the iPad. There are far more things that the iPad can be used for than the mac can in a real practical sense. So all this talk about the iPad Pro being useless and it being a failure I just dont get. I suppose people just resent their being a “pro” badged iPad because they don’t perceive value in it. But having high end in any product line is always a thing. Why should you be annoyed at that?
Why would you be annoyed at the great screen? The form factor? Etc.. I just find all this talk weird.
In an odd way, If the Mac didnt exist for some reason I could get by on a PC. But if my iPad with iOS disappeared, I dont think there is anything to really replace that.