That article was written for Parallels 7. You need to check if there were any relevant changes in Parallels 8.
Yes, sorry. I forgot to mention that I had read about Parallels 8. It looks like as of October, 2012 the limit has been increased to 16GB for a single virtual session. Though, apparently Parallels still warns against it.
http://apple.stackexchange.com/ques...s-parallels-8-recommend-max-4-gb-ram-for-a-vm
YES!!! "Happy days are here again..."
It has taken quite some time to get Apple to be reasonable about the virtualization of Snow Leopard (in spite of the fact that the Snow Leopard EULA does not prohibit its virtualization in Lion or Mt. Lion on a Mac).
I believe that my efforts to help everyday users be able to virtualize Snow Leopard in Parallels (and others who extended this information to VMWare Fusion) finally convinced Apple to let down the barriers, and they chose to do so with this 95% reduction in price of Snow Leopard Server.
My next project will be to develop instructions on how to "remove" the Server functions of Snow Leopard Server, so that it will be able to operate without the overhead needed by the "server" functionality and "look and feel" just like Snow Leopard client. I am waiting for my copy of SLS to arrive this week![]()
Awesome! Although, do you think that SLS will look/feel so differently that I will have a hard time running Pro Tools 8 LE in it?
Either way, I look forward to your next thread on removing the overhead from SLS, and I greatly thank you for all of the work that you have done on this one. I agree that threads, like the one you have created here, not only help us end users, but also helps get the word out to the developers and companies. So thank you, thank you, and thank you!