Does it change anything when trying to use the iPad while sitting on a couch?My mind is blown trying this with my M1 12.9. Awkward angle though but never tried it.
Does it change anything when trying to use the iPad while sitting on a couch?My mind is blown trying this with my M1 12.9. Awkward angle though but never tried it.
It is brighter in general use (SDR) where the miniLED is only 600 nits. You are wrong.It isn't brighter though. They both do 1000 nits total screen and 1600 nit area brightness.
How does the new iPad work as a frisbee? Let us know!I’m sitting outside in the morning sun with my iPad Pro 13 and I’m astounded by the readability of the screen with polarised sun glasses on. This is the first time I can clearly read a tablet with these glasses on. It even works in either orientation which the Samsung Tabs cannot do. It’s so bright and clear.
It’s a beautiful day here in Surfers Paradise too, might head to the beach.![]()
OK but why is that when both displays do the same 1000/1600 nits? Is there some reason the miniLED can't do that or is this just an Apple decision based on battery life or some other software choice?It is brighter in general use (SDR) where the miniLED is only 600 nits. You are wrong.
I guess it has to do with heat and battery life, yes. It is a software cap by Apple even though the display hardware is capable. The MacBook Pro displays do the same but you can override it via a little program on those devices. On iPad you are out of luck though.OK but why is that when both displays do the same 1000/1600 nits? Is there some reason the miniLED can't do that or is this just an Apple decision based on battery life or some other software choice?
Does it change anything when trying to use the iPad while sitting on a couch?
Not sure what you think, but I had the 12.9” and 13” side by side… the newer one is objectively much brighter for non-HDR content (1000 vs. 600 nits).It isn't brighter though. They both do 1000 nits total screen and 1600 nit area brightness.
The 13.4” Air is brighter than the 16“ Pro in sdr use as well.I guess it has to do with heat and battery life, yes. It is a software cap by Apple even though the display hardware is capable. The MacBook Pro displays do the same but you can override it via a little program on those devices. On iPad you are out of luck though.
A couple of inches? Would that not get in the way?Yes I saw that. Unfortunately that's not going to do anything, there's barely anything there. The lip should be raised at least a couple inches above the surface.
I miss base tones, even for podcasts or radio. Maybe there’s an app to increase base at lower volumes?speakers in such a thin device.
Seems faster than my iPhone, but could be something about the device being closer to the face?Is FID better?
This is the protector I'm using on my iPad Pro M1 12.9" and it's very nice.
![]()
QHOHQ [2+2 Pack] Tempered Glass Screen Protector for iPad Pro 12.9 2022/2021/2020 (6th/5th/4th Generation) with Camera Lens Protector, Ultra HD, Anti-Scratch, Designed for Face ID&Apple Pencil
QHOHQ [2+2 Pack] Tempered Glass Screen Protector for iPad Pro 12.9 2022/2021/2020 (6th/5th/4th Generation) with Camera Lens Protector, Ultra HD, Anti-Scratch, Designed for Face ID&Apple Pencilwww.amazon.com
I applied a screen protector and removed it right away. It gives to much glare. Its even unusable outside with the sun.
This! It's such an underrated feature... because I don't have to reach up and tap the power (lock/unlock) button on the iPad. And I know it's very small in the grand scheme of things... but as you stated it's much-welcomed.The new Magic Keyboard includes a lock/unlock button in its row of function keys, which is a much-welcomed feature.
A couple of inches? Would that not get in the way?
Image for lip illustration purposes only.
Which shouldn’t scratch it anyway as on the Jerryrig YouTube video the screen didn’t scratch until a hardness of 5 was used.That would guarantee no scratches because the glass doesn't come in contact with the metal.
Anything above 600 nits probably requires the backlight dimming zones to be so bright that it would make regular UI look bad due to the raised black level (black would be very visibly gray). Whereas the new OLED panel can have one pixel pure black (zero nits) and the neighboring pixel at full brightness (1000 or 1600 nits). That’s not possible with mini-LED.OK but why is that when both displays do the same 1000/1600 nits? Is there some reason the miniLED can't do that or is this just an Apple decision based on battery life or some other software choice?
Nice - I’d been thinking about this recently but this helped me crystallise those thoughtsAnything above 600 nits probably requires the backlight dimming zones to be so bright that it would make regular UI look bad due to the raised black level (black would be very visibly gray). Whereas the new OLED panel can have one pixel pure black (zero nits) and the neighboring pixel at full brightness (1000 or 1600 nits). That’s not possible with mini-LED.
Blooming wouldn’t be visible if the extra brightness was being used to fight off sunlight levels of ambient lighting. If the user was raising the brightness that high indoors then yes, I could see that being a problem.Anything above 600 nits probably requires the backlight dimming zones to be so bright that it would make regular UI look bad due to the raised black level (black would be very visibly gray). Whereas the new OLED panel can have one pixel pure black (zero nits) and the neighboring pixel at full brightness (1000 or 1600 nits). That’s not possible with mini-LED.
Yes, but I suspect they didn’t want to support and advertise it if it looks bad indoors. Effectively, it would mean that the UI, instead of having a dynamic range of 0–600, would be displayed with a dynamic range of 400–1000, or something like that. People would then call them out on false advertising because the SDR still only covers a delta of 600 nits.Blooming wouldn’t be visible if the extra brightness was being used to fight off sunlight levels of ambient lighting. If the user was raising the brightness that high indoors then yes, I could see that being a problem.