Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

spinedoc77

macrumors G4
Jun 11, 2009
11,488
5,413
Nobody is making excuses for Samsung, but comparing updates to Apple is asinine.

Other manufacturers like Moto have a much lighter overlay compared to Samsung.

I disagree. Samsung doesn't have that level of leverage yet over carriers, they have some, but not like Apple.

Samsung does update their own system features and UI very often. So it's not like they are asleep behind the wheel.

Also, I don't think it'll be 8 months.





It's you that brought the PC market up, I was just responding. Windows is not layered by any other manufacturer UI. There is no Touchwiz or Sense version of Windows. Basically every Windows computer is running Vanilla. And even still, there's possible performance degradation and driver issues when upgraded.

Sure you are making excuses for Samsung. "Other manufacturers like Moto have a much lighter overlay compared to Samsung." That smacks of an excuse in my book, a poor one at that, no disrespect intended. So let's cut Samsung an extra 6 months of slack?

My comparison with Apple was not really valid and I stated exactly so, but it was meant to convey my point to someone who may not be familiar with Android fragmentation.

I also highly doubt Samsung doesn't have that kind of leverage. The carriers sell a lot of their business because of Samsung phones, A LOT. I don't know the numbers, but I'm sure Samsung is right up there with Apple in terms of volume, but even if they sold half Apple's volume that's still a heck of a lot of clout. No that's definitely an excuse IMO.

As for the PC market, yes I brought it up as a great example. Windows isn't layered because Microsoft does not allow that. But now we are getting into more nuances as Windows is a for profit, private OS where Android is open source. I've many times said that Google shares in the blame by not using its clout with Google Play and Google apps to push the oems and carriers to faster updates. But I still think that is just more of an excuse, my guess is Samsung has PLENTY of time to get their overlay and UI running on OS code Google provides them.

Not 8 months? Well it was 8 months for MM on the Note 5, and we will never know for the Note 7.
Let's see, Nougat release 8/22/16
S7 Nougat update for Verizon 3/7/2017 = roughly 6 1/2 months (5/8/17 for unlocked version = 8 1/2 months)

I'll predict 7 months for the slowest carrier, usually Verizon. Although from past experience the slowest one may actually be the ONE THAT IS NOT CARRIER CONSTRICTED! But I can't predict the future, who knows maybe Samsung will be awesome this year and have the update in a few months. Let's revisit this discussion then!!
[doublepost=1505934816][/doublepost]
The X uses a different screen than the iPhone 7 and 8 ips panel. The X will require more nits to be seen in the sun just because of how amoled works. My s7 edge is hard to see in the sun where my note 8 and iPhone 7 are easy to see. I do think the X will have issues in the sun..

I can't see my 7+ in the sun at all, even with brightness cranked up to max. It's just a black screen.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,158
25,268
Gotta be in it to win it
Based on what we know so far it is inferior. So for it to be the best panel it needs to beat the Note 8 in that aspect.It does not do that. So its not the best. Whats wrong with saying this?
Nothing wrong, but it should also be said this may be the exact specifications Apple ordered for reasons known only to them. Opposite to “Samsung declines to give Apple their best”.

I don't care whether I end up with the Note 8 or iPhone X. Both are excellent phones.
Well good luck.
 

LIVEFRMNYC

macrumors G3
Oct 27, 2009
8,877
10,987
Sure you are making excuses for Samsung. "Other manufacturers like Moto have a much lighter overlay compared to Samsung." That smacks of an excuse in my book, a poor one at that, no disrespect intended. So let's cut Samsung an extra 6 months of slack?

It's not an excuse. Touchwiz/Samsung Experience UI is basically a whole other OS on top of Android. Damn near every part of Android is manipulated, at least from a user experience level.

Now I'm speaking on the way things were and are at the moment. Which is why I have high hopes for Project Treble.

And also, I'm not saying Samsung and the Carriers are not guilty of dragging their asses. But you were arguing since something is out now, it should be out to all devices now(or in a very short period).

Also, Moto doesn't have the best track record of updates. They just recently over the years got better with their flagships. But they have broken plenty of promises.



I also highly doubt Samsung doesn't have that kind of leverage. The carriers sell a lot of their business because of Samsung phones, A LOT. I don't know the numbers, but I'm sure Samsung is right up there with Apple in terms of volume, but even if they sold half Apple's volume that's still a heck of a lot of clout. No that's definitely an excuse IMO.

Samsung is the most prefered Android phone. But it's not like they are filling a void. Consumers would still have a wide range of choice. If for some reason carriers decided to drop Samsung phones, the market would still move on. I will admit, that Samsung (like Apple) is good at getting consumers to upgrade. Whereas many consumers might not upgrade with other phones, which is why Samsung has some leverage. But again, they are not up there with Apple yet.

With Apple, consumers would be comfortable just financing or purchasing directly from them, if iPhones were no longer available through carriers. Samsung also has financing options, but not the same level of storefront and customer service, and that won't instill trust towards possible consumers. At least here in America, Samsung would lose extremly big without the carriers, while Apple would do just fine selling iPhones themselves.



As for the PC market, yes I brought it up as a great example. Windows isn't layered because Microsoft does not allow that. But now we are getting into more nuances as Windows is a for profit, private OS where Android is open source. I've many times said that Google shares in the blame by not using its clout with Google Play and Google apps to push the oems and carriers to faster updates. But I still think that is just more of an excuse, my guess is Samsung has PLENTY of time to get their overlay and UI running on OS code Google provides them.

And when someone calls Dell Customer service and complains about poor battery life and sluggish performance on their upgraded Windows 10 for their x year old laptop. Dell CS will walk them through a recovery from the factory partition and have them roll back Windows to the factory version it came with. The smartphone market is a differ beast. While Dell and Windows can point fingers at each other and get away with it. When it comes to smartphones, the consumer will always blame the manufacturer.

Also you have to factor, PCs are designed around open bootloaders and generic drivers. It doesn't make an install/upgrade of Windows optimized. Smartphones need to be optimized specifically.




Not 8 months? Well it was 8 months for MM on the Note 5, and we will never know for the Note 7.
Let's see, Nougat release 8/22/16
S7 Nougat update for Verizon 3/7/2017 = roughly 6 1/2 months (5/8/17 for unlocked version = 8 1/2 months)

I'll predict 7 months for the slowest carrier, usually Verizon. Although from past experience the slowest one may actually be the ONE THAT IS NOT CARRIER CONSTRICTED! But I can't predict the future, who knows maybe Samsung will be awesome this year and have the update in a few months. Let's revisit this discussion then!!
[doublepost=1505934816][/doublepost]

I can't see my 7+ in the sun at all, even with brightness cranked up to max. It's just a black screen.


I doubt 8 months, but it's possible. Previous update timelines are inconsistent. But it's been getting better overall year my year.
 
Last edited:

1BadManVan

macrumors 68040
Dec 20, 2009
3,285
3,446
Bc Canada
Still love to know how much of that performance gain is from the simplicity of iOS vs the much more complex and layered android. Have a hard time believing the 6 core A11 is that much more pure power compared to the 8 core snapdragon.

Like if you were to swap chips into the other phone and OS, would the results be the same or would the snapdragon come ahead now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr

spinedoc77

macrumors G4
Jun 11, 2009
11,488
5,413
It's not an excuse. Touchwiz/Samsung Experience UI is basically a whole other OS on top of Android. Damn near every part of Android is manipulated, at least from a user experience level.

Now I'm speaking on the way things were and are at the moment. Which is why I have high hopes for Project Treble.

And also, I'm not saying Samsung and the Carriers are not guilty of dragging their asses. But you were arguing since something is out now, it should be out to all devices now(or in a very short period).

Also, Moto doesn't have the best track record of updates. They just recently over the years got better with their flagships. But they have broken plenty of promises.





Samsung is the most prefered Android phone. But it's not like they are filling a void. Consumers would still have a wide range of choice. If for some reason carriers decided to drop Samsung phones, the market would still move on. I will admit, that Samsung (like Apple) is good at getting consumers to upgrade. Whereas many consumers might not upgrade with other phones, which is why Samsung has some leverage. But again, they are not up there with Apple yet.

With Apple, consumers would be comfortable just financing or purchasing directly from them, if iPhones were no longer available through carriers. Samsung also has financing options, but not the same level of storefront and customer service, and that won't instill trust towards possible consumers. At least here in America, Samsung would lose extremly big without the carriers, while Apple would do just fine selling iPhones themselves.





And when someone calls Dell Customer service and complains about poor battery life and sluggish performance on their upgraded Windows 10 for their x year old laptop. Dell CS will walk them through a recovery from the factory partition and have them roll back Windows to the factory version it came with. The smartphone market is a differ beast. While Dell and Windows can point fingers at each other and get away with it. When it comes to smartphones, the consumer will always blame the manufacturer.

Also you have to factor, PCs are designed around open bootloaders and generic drivers. It doesn't make an install/upgrade of Windows optimized. Smartphones need to be optimized specifically.







I doubt 8 months, but it's possible. Previous update timelines are inconsistent. But it's been getting better overall year my year.


No I wasn't arguing that it should be out now, I was arguing that 8 months is just too long to get an OS update. My personal opinion 2-3 months is reasonable, even with the more difficult UI, anything longer than that is just an excuse in my personal opinion.

As for Dell CSR, I'll bet the consumer blames Dell much more often than Microsoft. The device they bought has the Dell name on it, they called Dell customer service, Dell provides the warranty, a Dell representative answered the call and is instructing them on what to do. I'd say that's quite similar to the smartphone market where a consumer usually isn't going to blame Google, but they will most likely blame the oem who makes the phone.

I think smartphones should also be designed like PC's, with Google distributing the OS as it releases and the oems applying for and testing their drivers and whatever else they need during that beta period. The PC industry has survived for decades using this process and there haven't been any major issues. But once again a different business model, for profit versus open source. I don't see why smartphones need more optimization than a PC though, they really are just mini computers after all.

Anyway I understand the crux of the matter, 8 months is much too long for OS updates but others don't agree with me and are fine with that time frame. It's just a mater of my opinion differing from yours and I don't think we will find agreement. /peace.

PS: my bet was 7 months, and I'm not seeing anything getting better. 8 months for the Note 5, 8 1/2 months for the unlocked S7, etc. I'll stick to my 7 months release date for Oreo on the Note 7 for either the last carrier, or the unlocked version.
 

thunng8

macrumors 65816
Feb 8, 2006
1,032
417
Still love to know how much of that performance gain is from the simplicity of iOS vs the much more complex and layered android. Have a hard time believing the 6 core A11 is that much more pure power compared to the 8 core snapdragon.

Like if you were to swap chips into the other phone and OS, would the results be the same or would the snapdragon come ahead now?
It would be the same. The a11 is really more than 2x faster on a high performance core to core basis.

Only caveat is in ram limited situations. Android required more memory than iOS so the 2 or 3 gb ram in a11 wouldn’t keep many apps in memory.
 

LIVEFRMNYC

macrumors G3
Oct 27, 2009
8,877
10,987
No I wasn't arguing that it should be out now, I was arguing that 8 months is just too long to get an OS update. My personal opinion 2-3 months is reasonable, even with the more difficult UI, anything longer than that is just an excuse in my personal opinion.

I agree, several months is reasonable. And there is no excuse with unlocked/unbranded phones.


As for Dell CSR, I'll bet the consumer blames Dell much more often than Microsoft. The device they bought has the Dell name on it, they called Dell customer service, Dell provides the warranty, a Dell representative answered the call and is instructing them on what to do. I'd say that's quite similar to the smartphone market where a consumer usually isn't going to blame Google, but they will most likely blame the oem who makes the phone.

I worked in that field before. PC manufacturers have no problem telling consumers to call MS CS, if something isn't working properly that they can't fix. I'm pretty sure a smartphone manufacturer would never tell a consumer to call Google CS unless it was a Google Account issue. Smartphone manufacturers just can't get away with that.


I think smartphones should also be designed like PC's, with Google distributing the OS as it releases and the oems applying for and testing their drivers and whatever else they need during that beta period. The PC industry has survived for decades using this process and there haven't been any major issues. But once again a different business model, for profit versus open source. I don't see why smartphones need more optimization than a PC though, they really are just mini computers after all.

That's somewhat similar to what Project Treble is. The slideshow made it easy for me to understand. :D
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/201...ndroid-updates-no-really-with-project-treble/

Anyway I understand the crux of the matter, 8 months is much too long for OS updates but others don't agree with me and are fine with that time frame. It's just a mater of my opinion differing from yours and I don't think we will find agreement. /peace.

I agree 8 months is too long.

Cause you stated "Oreo is out NOW"(as you put it), I was under the impression you meant there is no justifiable reason for ANY amount of delay.

PS: my bet was 7 months, and I'm not seeing anything getting better. 8 months for the Note 5, 8 1/2 months for the unlocked S7, etc. I'll stick to my 7 months release date for Oreo on the Note 7 for either the last carrier, or the unlocked version.

The Note 8 is already a huge success for Samsung, and is Samsung's jewel at the moment. Just based on reputation alone, I think Note 8 will see Oreo in about 3-4 months tops.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
Nothing wrong, but it should also be said this may be the exact specifications Apple ordered for reasons known only to them. Opposite to “Samsung declines to give Apple their best”.

Why will Apple buy an OLED with inferior brightness? As I showed above it’s a huge difference. The brightness is what makes Samsung’s oled as good as it is.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,158
25,268
Gotta be in it to win it
Why will Apple buy an OLED with inferior brightness? As I showed above it’s a huge difference. The brightness is what makes Samsung’s oled as good as it is.
As I said you or I or most people not directly involved were not privy to the discussions. Know what “they” say about assuming.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
As I said you or I or most people not directly involved were not privy to the discussions. Know what “they” say about assuming.

So then at the end of the day it’s inferior to the Note 8 OLED based on current data.

Possibilities are Apple asked for it or it’s also possible Samsung didn’t give them the best oled.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,158
25,268
Gotta be in it to win it
So then at the end of the day it’s inferior to the Note 8 OLED based on current data.

Possibilities are Apple asked for it or it’s also possible Samsung didn’t give them the best oled.
I don’t really care what the specs say and I’m sure most people won’t care. The 8 and x will both sell briskly, IMO.
 

BlueGoldAce

macrumors 68000
Oct 11, 2011
1,951
1,455

Nice contribution of a already, well known variable. Apple has lead the industry in pure mobile hardware processing power for a while now.

They need too...all their (inferior) AI software runs off the local hardware, rather than the cloud (Google, leveraging its machine learning technology, which is far, far above anything anyone else has.)

If you decide to post something useful, I'll be the first to congratulate you.

One can dream, right?
[doublepost=1505966862][/doublepost]
Okay we’re going around in circles now. My original comment stands that you are making a conclusion not supported by facts.

I mean, he did say "likely"...thus he is making a guided hypothesis based of history and the available specs of the device.

If you want to be literal, neither of you know what is what...so arguing is pointless. Your point is correct, we indeed do not know what panel is being used. His argument is also correct, history and the apple provided specs are on his side.

We will know soon enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Radon87000

thunng8

macrumors 65816
Feb 8, 2006
1,032
417
So then at the end of the day it’s inferior to the Note 8 OLED based on current data.

Possibilities are Apple asked for it or it’s also possible Samsung didn’t give them the best oled.
Apple have not commented on absolute maximum brightness of the oled panel they are using just typical maximum brightness. What typical means is unclear.

The quoted high number for the note8 is only applicable if only part of the screen is illuminated with white. The more white the less bright it can go. That’s why the maximum brightness listed is 560-1240 on displaymate not a single figure as per lcd screens.

For example if the content is mostly white - the iPhone 7 screen with 720 nits brightness is brighter than the note8 display.
 

Zipster3

Suspended
Sep 1, 2017
139
52
I don’t really care what the specs say and I’m sure most people won’t care. The 8 and x will both sell briskly, IMO.

Exactly, back to a 2 week wait here already. Note 8 can be picked up anywhere just walk in.
 

BlueGoldAce

macrumors 68000
Oct 11, 2011
1,951
1,455
Exactly, back to a 2 week wait here already. Note 8 can be picked up anywhere just walk in.

I can pick up the iPhone on release day, any model, at my local store in Indiana.

The note 8, through Samsung, is on back order. I just ordered one for the wife a few days ago, and got the back order status.

Does your product of choice selling serve as a justification for you?
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
Apple have not commented on absolute maximum brightness of the oled panel they are using just typical maximum brightness. What typical means is unclear.

The quoted high number for the note8 is only applicable if only part of the screen is illuminated with white. The more white the less bright it can go. That’s why the maximum brightness listed is 560-1240 on displaymate not a single figure as per lcd screens.

For example if the content is mostly white - the iPhone 7 screen with 720 nits brightness is brighter than the note8 display.
A reviewer compared his Note 8 when he was inside with the iPhone X and he said the Note 8 was much brighter and had more pop. Make of that what you will.
[doublepost=1505973090][/doublepost]
I can pick up the iPhone on release day, any model, at my local store in Indiana.

The note 8, through Samsung, is on back order. I just ordered one for the wife a few days ago, and got the back order status.

Does your product of choice selling serve as a justification for you?
That's the iPhone 8 which no one is buying. You have 60 seconds on the 27th to get an iPhone X otherwise wait for next year as you won't get one.
 

Shanghaichica

macrumors G5
Apr 8, 2013
14,725
13,245
UK
Exactly, back to a 2 week wait here already. Note 8 can be picked up anywhere just walk in.
Here the 8 plus can be picked up from my local apple store tomorrow. However I never expected the note 8 to be back ordered. Doesn't mean that it's not a good phone.
 

The Game 161

macrumors Nehalem
Dec 15, 2010
30,991
20,172
UK
Exactly, back to a 2 week wait here already. Note 8 can be picked up anywhere just walk in.
But you don't know why this is. Samsung maybe has made enough units to handle demand? the 8 and 8 plus might well but hard to get but if they havn't produced enough then it doesn't mean everybody wants it. Just means there isn't enough stock made

from all reports the note 8 is selling very well so far.
 
Last edited:

torana355

macrumors 68040
Dec 8, 2009
3,633
2,734
Sydney, Australia
I don’t really care what the specs say and I’m sure most people won’t care. The 8 and x will both sell briskly, IMO.
What that says is Apples previous great reputation is a strong selling point. It does not necessarily mean its a good product that they are selling. Mind you i think the X looks like an awesome phone, i'm sure when everyone get their hands on it they will love it and by next year people will be wanting to get away from the 8 and 8+ design quick smart.
 

thunng8

macrumors 65816
Feb 8, 2006
1,032
417
A reviewer compared his Note 8 when he was inside with the iPhone X and he said the Note 8 was much brighter and had more pop. Make of that what you will.
If it was indoors each device’s auto brightness would have ramped the brightness way down, so I doubt I would take anything away from that. The real test would be outdoors in direct sunlight.
 

BlueGoldAce

macrumors 68000
Oct 11, 2011
1,951
1,455
A reviewer compared his Note 8 when he was inside with the iPhone X and he said the Note 8 was much brighter and had more pop. Make of that what you will.
[doublepost=1505973090][/doublepost]
That's the iPhone 8 which no one is buying. You have 60 seconds on the 27th to get an iPhone X otherwise wait for next year as you won't get one.
Right. He was talking about the 8 have a two week back order.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.