You cannot be serious here. The notch is 100% subjective. It's not an "iFans" thing.
Some of you just will not accept that people prefer, with good reason for *them*, iOS to Android.
If some of you want to keep referencing how "iFans" change their tune, it was literally just a few weeks ago most on here insisted:
- iPhone 8's were just year over year iterative of the 7's and offered no value.
- Essential was a dud because it had no wireless charging, no headphone jack, and wasn't IP68 certified.
- $1K for a phone??? FAIL FAIL FAIL
- Apple charged outrageous prices for dongles.
Fast forward to the Pixel unveiling and suddenly:
- Regular Pixel and XL 2 are AMAZING despite being only incrementally different than last year's versions (the regular one being virtually identical).
- No wireless charging. No headphone jack. BUT OH MY GOD STILL AMAZING.
- Pixel XL with no wireless charging, no headphone jack is almost 1K?? SUCCESS SUCCESS SUCCESS GOOGLE'S GOT IT GOIN ON!!!
- Google USB C to 3.5 dongle: $20 (Apple's is $9).
Listen, it's really simple: you guys are good with it because you see *value* in what Android does. You prefer Android to iOS. Thus the other person's OS is junk and has no value. That's bias. I don't think your love stems from marketing, same as most people that use iOS aren't swayed by marketing but rather their experiences with that platform.
Everyone has biases, some are worse than others. I don't really see too many iPhone folks saying anything that different to the Android folks. There are always outliers.
My daily driver is a Note 8, and I have a Panda Pixel XL on the way. May or may not get an iPhone X. So I don't have a dog in this fight other than to say the claims of sheep and ifans and fanboyism and all the rest rings hollow. The Pixel threads have been hilarious considering how line-in-the-sand most people were about what constituted a flagship and what constituted a flagship that was worth the money. That all seemed to change when the flagship in question was the OS of their flavor.