Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

KarimLeVallois

macrumors 68030
Feb 22, 2014
2,614
1,776
London
I recommend both. I use Pro Camera for Regular RAW 12 megapixels which (in my opinion) is how to unleash the full power of the iPhone cameras and achieve the most natural and detailed photos.

ProCam is what I use to shoot ProRAW 48 when I need the extra resolution. But the results are nowhere near as natural as Pro Camera Regular RAW.
Thanks for coming back. Ah, so no app that does everything then.
 

Nahrafx

macrumors newbie
Oct 28, 2024
1
0
When I got the 15 Pro Max last year I posted a thread about the inferior quality of ProRAW 48 using the stock app comparing to 14 Pro Max from 2022. At that time I was convinced that it was a bug that Apple would solve quickly. They didn't.

I was hoping for 16 Pro Max to perform better in this area but it is just the same overprocessed and denoised mess that we saw on 15 Pro Max.

Luckily, there are other apps that can take higher quality 48MP shots on the iPhone. Halide, Firstlight and ProCamera are some examples.

Just check these 100% crops between Halide (to the left) and Stock (to the right)







If you want to shoot high res on the iPhones, test some third party apps!

Now I only wish that they would allow third party apps to shoot regular raw (without remosaicking) in 48MP.
When I got the 15 Pro Max last year I posted a thread about the inferior quality of ProRAW 48 using the stock app comparing to 14 Pro Max from 2022. At that time I was convinced that it was a bug that Apple would solve quickly. They didn't.

I was hoping for 16 Pro Max to perform better in this area but it is just the same overprocessed and denoised mess that we saw on 15 Pro Max.

Luckily, there are other apps that can take higher quality 48MP shots on the iPhone. Halide, Firstlight and ProCamera are some examples.

Just check these 100% crops between Halide (to the left) and Stock (to the right)







If you want to shoot high res on the iPhones, test some third party apps!

Now I only wish that they would allow third party apps to shoot regular raw (without remosaicking) in 48MP.
Hi! I having the same issue like you…my photo pixelated when fully zoom in proraw max compared to heif max but i found out something to remove pixelated effect from proraw max…i try lightly edit in photo app itself for example exposure +1 & save then photo become more better. I attached comparison

When I got the 15 Pro Max last year I posted a thread about the inferior quality of ProRAW 48 using the stock app comparing to 14 Pro Max from 2022. At that time I was convinced that it was a bug that Apple would solve quickly. They didn't.

I was hoping for 16 Pro Max to perform better in this area but it is just the same overprocessed and denoised mess that we saw on 15 Pro Max.

Luckily, there are other apps that can take higher quality 48MP shots on the iPhone. Halide, Firstlight and ProCamera are some examples.

Just check these 100% crops between Halide (to the left) and Stock (to the right)







If you want to shoot high res on the iPhones, test some third party apps!

Now I only wish that they would allow third party apps to shoot regular raw (without remosaicking) in 48MP.
I just found out something if i lightly edit proraw max photo in photo apps itself, just adjust +1 exposure & save then the quality become more better…no more pixelated when fully zoom in… View attachment 2442825 View attachment 2442824
There is currently a bug for 48 MP ProRAW in iOS 18 on 15 Pro Max - it seems like the device isn’t capturing data correctly in this mode because zooming in all the way reveals pixelated photos, whereas before it was grainy/slightly blurry at the highest zoom but not pixelated. This is reproducible every time and goes away if the mode is switched to HEIF Max. Viewing old 48 MP photos before this bug was introduced look fine so I suspect it’s an issue at the level of the camera app. Feedback already submitted. Do photos look pixelated when you zoom in all the way on 16 PM?
I have the same issue but I found something that might help...try lightly edit proraw max photo in photo apps itself (example: exposure +1) & then save...the photo become more better
IMG_0266.png
IMG_0265.png
 

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,900
5,886
Central Tx
I recommend both. I use Pro Camera for Regular RAW 12 megapixels which (in my opinion) is how to unleash the full power of the iPhone cameras and achieve the most natural and detailed photos.

ProCam is what I use to shoot ProRAW 48 when I need the extra resolution. But the results are nowhere near as natural as Pro Camera Regular RAW.
Halide now offers its Zero Process mode for pure raw as well.
 

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,900
5,886
Central Tx
My ProRaw files look better after 18.1. The stacking process of the final image takes longer now like it should and the photos are clean. This is on the iPhone I have that was having ProRaw issues before I restored the iPhone. Photos are better now. I still have more tests to run
 
  • Like
Reactions: krvld

nunolikeapple

macrumors member
Jul 21, 2015
87
58
I tested, re-tested and everything is the same. Same artifacts everywhere. Pixelation!

(Native ProRAW MAX [48MP] vs ProCam ProRAW [48MP])
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0237.png
    IMG_0237.png
    1 MB · Views: 28
  • IMG_0239.png
    IMG_0239.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0240.png
    IMG_0240.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 29
  • IMG_0241.png
    IMG_0241.png
    1.6 MB · Views: 26
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Artsketch and krvld

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,900
5,886
Central Tx
I tested, re-tested and everything is the same. Same artifacts everywhere. Pixelation!

(Native ProRAW MAX [48MP] vs ProCam ProRAW [48MP])
That’s crazy!!! My camera files have improved and the focus is better. Can’t believe that Yours hasn’t improved. Are you able to get a replacement?

I forgot, your iPhone is a pro or pro max?
 

nunolikeapple

macrumors member
Jul 21, 2015
87
58
That’s crazy!!! My camera files have improved and the focus is better. Can’t believe that Yours hasn’t improved. Are you able to get a replacement?

I forgot, your iPhone is a pro or pro max?
No need replacement, because its not hardwere, but software, and also reproductable by others. Including another 3 16PM that i tested last hours from family, same issues. Only an update will solve this.
 
  • Love
Reactions: krvld

jajo.j

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 11, 2023
321
986
Yeah... ios 18 problem. I tried also 1 Iphone 15PM with ios 17 and then ios 18 and the problem was visible only in ios 18, after the update. Only 14 pro series are safe with proraw.

But 15PM with iOS 17 still has much worse ProRAW performance than 14PM. Just a small note.
 

Artsketch

macrumors 6502
Oct 22, 2019
330
268
It seems that iOS 18.1 has ruined the quality of 48MP ProRAW on the 14 Pro with artificial bokeh. But I need to take more photos in daylight to confirm. That can't be possible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nunolikeapple

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,900
5,886
Central Tx
ProRAW with iOS 18.1…. Amazing quality, I love it. The ProRAW files look so good.

These were not taken in night mode, only ProRaw 48mp.

Sorry to say so because I know several of you guys are still having issues with your iPhones. Hopefully the issues get resolved promptly. Both of my 16 pro max iPhones are constant with each other. The desert titanium iPhone was the one I was having issues with when using ProRAW, after the restore, the ProRAW files were much better. Now with 18.1, the ProRAW images are better still. I’m in Houston tonight, taking night photos. Excellent dynamic range. Lightroom edits.

IMG_8795.jpeg


IMG_8794.jpeg


IMG_8798.jpeg


IMG_8796.jpeg


IMG_0088.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: krvld

shadowboi

macrumors 6502a
Feb 16, 2024
680
1,201
Unknown
My iPhone 11 Pro now shoots so much ugly photos that I just gave up. No RAW, no editing, nothing. Phone no more gives me any pleasure when I try taking photos with it. I found my old Sony Ericsson G700 from 2008. I never realized its 3.2mp no-AF camera can be this good!

1730185645863.jpeg


Don’t look at the “detail”. Look at the colors. One of the first Sony sensor iterations. This is literally how it looked in real life. Can ANY new iPhone even compete? At least mine makes everything look unnatural, oversharpened, overHDRed, not crisp or naturally sharp, fully denoised, literally not as it should be.

1730185873383.jpeg


My iPhone 5 and (not mine) iPhone 4 took similar photos as this Sony Ericsson, but 5 has crushed display and camera fell off completely, and 4 has almost dead display and totally destroyed back glass. Will probably try searching used 4 to replace but not sure I wanna do that since my only 30 pin cable is almost dead and no one selling the original cable that actually works.

In fact, for now sending those lovely Sony shots via bluetooth seems like the top option for actually UNPROCESSED phone imagery. Oh, btw iPhone still cannot send via bluetooth sadly, only AirDrop which works only to Apple devices. I even forgot how useful bluetooth is.

Even some random shot of my home wine collection looks so true to life and nostalgic. One would say “but the highlights are blown”. YES, they are. Those are laws of physics for a tiny sensor, and breaking them with some gimmicky HDR and AI would just make things worse 95% of all time.

1730186552326.jpeg


And some autumn leaves to top it up:
1730186802955.jpeg



Not telling everyone should do that, but at least I had some TRUE pleasure taking these photos vs shooting with my iPhone. Not sure it was just nostalgia since I rarely took any shots with the phone back in the days. I had recently tried 16 Pro irl and honestly, it feels even worse in some areas than ancient 11 Pro, even more sharpening and postprocessing, denoising is less aggressive tho.

I think people must pressure Apple into giving back controls over photography. This means writing more forum posts, posting on social media, tiktok and of course flooding their apple.com/feedback page. I personally don’t want them to do any processing to my shots, I know my tools perfectly enough to post-process myself. Some shots (like the ones I provided) do not even need any post processing, or else it will ruin natural look of the images. I don’t need RAW because I don’t have time to edit these large shots, I want “natural” button and ability to simply shoot jpegs.

There is for sure always another option… an Android phone, Open Camera app and basically thats it. Apple should finally realize if they do not cater to photographers and continue to market their phones as “Pro choice”, more people would naturally drift to competition.

Btw, why iPhones can no more give natural motion blur, unless you shoot in RAW? The obsession with stabilization doesn’t always equal to more “artsy” and “aesthetic” shots. While this one below surely doesn’t look like a good photograph, it has some interesting “vibe” that lures in

1730187455361.jpeg
 

krvld

macrumors member
Jul 20, 2023
62
49
My iPhone 11 Pro now shoots so much ugly photos that I just gave up. No RAW, no editing, nothing. Phone no more gives me any pleasure when I try taking photos with it. I found my old Sony Ericsson G700 from 2008. I never realized its 3.2mp no-AF camera can be this good!

View attachment 2443529

Don’t look at the “detail”. Look at the colors. One of the first Sony sensor iterations. This is literally how it looked in real life. Can ANY new iPhone even compete? At least mine makes everything look unnatural, oversharpened, overHDRed, not crisp or naturally sharp, fully denoised, literally not as it should be.

View attachment 2443530

My iPhone 5 and (not mine) iPhone 4 took similar photos as this Sony Ericsson, but 5 has crushed display and camera fell off completely, and 4 has almost dead display and totally destroyed back glass. Will probably try searching used 4 to replace but not sure I wanna do that since my only 30 pin cable is almost dead and no one selling the original cable that actually works.

In fact, for now sending those lovely Sony shots via bluetooth seems like the top option for actually UNPROCESSED phone imagery. Oh, btw iPhone still cannot send via bluetooth sadly, only AirDrop which works only to Apple devices. I even forgot how useful bluetooth is.

Even some random shot of my home wine collection looks so true to life and nostalgic. One would say “but the highlights are blown”. YES, they are. Those are laws of physics for a tiny sensor, and breaking them with some gimmicky HDR and AI would just make things worse 95% of all time.

View attachment 2443536

And some autumn leaves to top it up:
View attachment 2443537


Not telling everyone should do that, but at least I had some TRUE pleasure taking these photos vs shooting with my iPhone. Not sure it was just nostalgia since I rarely took any shots with the phone back in the days. I had recently tried 16 Pro irl and honestly, it feels even worse in some areas than ancient 11 Pro, even more sharpening and postprocessing, denoising is less aggressive tho.

I think people must pressure Apple into giving back controls over photography. This means writing more forum posts, posting on social media, tiktok and of course flooding their apple.com/feedback page. I personally don’t want them to do any processing to my shots, I know my tools perfectly enough to post-process myself. Some shots (like the ones I provided) do not even need any post processing, or else it will ruin natural look of the images. I don’t need RAW because I don’t have time to edit these large shots, I want “natural” button and ability to simply shoot jpegs.

There is for sure always another option… an Android phone, Open Camera app and basically thats it. Apple should finally realize if they do not cater to photographers and continue to market their phones as “Pro choice”, more people would naturally drift to competition.

Btw, why iPhones can no more give natural motion blur, unless you shoot in RAW? The obsession with stabilization doesn’t always equal to more “artsy” and “aesthetic” shots. While this one below surely doesn’t look like a good photograph, it has some interesting “vibe” that lures in

View attachment 2443540
We are with you. My iPhone 5s was perfect.
 

Artsketch

macrumors 6502
Oct 22, 2019
330
268
Is it possible to set manual shutter speed in ProCam for 48MP ProRAW while keeping ISO on auto mode? On the 14 Pro both change to manual mode.
 

jajo.j

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Oct 11, 2023
321
986
My iPhone 11 Pro now shoots so much ugly photos that I just gave up. No RAW, no editing, nothing. Phone no more gives me any pleasure when I try taking photos with it. I found my old Sony Ericsson G700 from 2008. I never realized its 3.2mp no-AF camera can be this good!

View attachment 2443529

Don’t look at the “detail”. Look at the colors. One of the first Sony sensor iterations. This is literally how it looked in real life. Can ANY new iPhone even compete? At least mine makes everything look unnatural, oversharpened, overHDRed, not crisp or naturally sharp, fully denoised, literally not as it should be.

View attachment 2443530

My iPhone 5 and (not mine) iPhone 4 took similar photos as this Sony Ericsson, but 5 has crushed display and camera fell off completely, and 4 has almost dead display and totally destroyed back glass. Will probably try searching used 4 to replace but not sure I wanna do that since my only 30 pin cable is almost dead and no one selling the original cable that actually works.

In fact, for now sending those lovely Sony shots via bluetooth seems like the top option for actually UNPROCESSED phone imagery. Oh, btw iPhone still cannot send via bluetooth sadly, only AirDrop which works only to Apple devices. I even forgot how useful bluetooth is.

Even some random shot of my home wine collection looks so true to life and nostalgic. One would say “but the highlights are blown”. YES, they are. Those are laws of physics for a tiny sensor, and breaking them with some gimmicky HDR and AI would just make things worse 95% of all time.

View attachment 2443536

And some autumn leaves to top it up:
View attachment 2443537


Not telling everyone should do that, but at least I had some TRUE pleasure taking these photos vs shooting with my iPhone. Not sure it was just nostalgia since I rarely took any shots with the phone back in the days. I had recently tried 16 Pro irl and honestly, it feels even worse in some areas than ancient 11 Pro, even more sharpening and postprocessing, denoising is less aggressive tho.

I think people must pressure Apple into giving back controls over photography. This means writing more forum posts, posting on social media, tiktok and of course flooding their apple.com/feedback page. I personally don’t want them to do any processing to my shots, I know my tools perfectly enough to post-process myself. Some shots (like the ones I provided) do not even need any post processing, or else it will ruin natural look of the images. I don’t need RAW because I don’t have time to edit these large shots, I want “natural” button and ability to simply shoot jpegs.

There is for sure always another option… an Android phone, Open Camera app and basically thats it. Apple should finally realize if they do not cater to photographers and continue to market their phones as “Pro choice”, more people would naturally drift to competition.

Btw, why iPhones can no more give natural motion blur, unless you shoot in RAW? The obsession with stabilization doesn’t always equal to more “artsy” and “aesthetic” shots. While this one below surely doesn’t look like a good photograph, it has some interesting “vibe” that lures in

View attachment 2443540

I think you would like how Regular/Native RAW looks with an app like Pro Camera. Completely unprocessed. The way to get great performance from iPhone camera is third party apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: krvld

shadowboi

macrumors 6502a
Feb 16, 2024
680
1,201
Unknown
I think you would like how Regular/Native RAW looks with an app like Pro Camera. Completely unprocessed. The way to get great performance from iPhone camera is third party apps.
ProCamera is my favorite so far if only the editing process wasn’t such a nightmare. I expect fully finished shot just without all the “makeup” and instead I have to extensively edit RAW files, one by one:

- turning off “boost” slider. Turns out it is a NATIVE Apple RAW setting and ProCamera and other RAW editors just provide access to it;
- Turn all the way down the luma noise reduction;
- Turn down a bit of a color noise reduction;
- Completely turn down sharpening;
- Touch up some contrast and/or saturation, natively iPhone RAW looks horrendous, especially if photos are taken during daytime;

All the edits take up 2-10 minutes. And when I have many shots it becomes so boring that I just don’t wanna even bother. I would much more like sliders in photos app to turn off unnecessary processing. I am more than sure this processing also sucks up battery life.

UPD: few more things.

When taking RAW photos in any app, auto settings do not always work properly. I.e. while great for static objects, in RAW mode iPhone no longer relies on accelerometer and gyroscope to determine the speed at which you move, i.e. it often fails to determine right shutter speed and ISO. I have often seen iPhone to overexpose unless I compensate exposure by -0.7 (not ideal tho, often had underexposure).

Another issue with RAW is that iPhone doesn’t provide a full RAW image preview, so I cannot see how my settings changes reflect in real time and can only guess if I did everything right. Sort of not used to it after more than decade of digital photography and live image previewing
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: krvld
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.