Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I just use gerforce now, youtube, netlfix, taking notes, web browsing thats bascially all I do, so the other "pro" features arent useful to me
Better display and better speakers apply to all. And you do not know when the higher bandwidth and added ports of MBP may prove useful. I would choose the M2 MBP.
 
Hi, Im going into this college this fall semester and upgrading my 2020 i3 Macbook Air. As i was looking I saw a $1400 m3 MacBook Air (13 inch) with 16 GB of RAM and a 512 ssd. Furthermore, I saw an Apple refurbished M2 Pro MacBook Pro with 16 GB of RAM and 512 SD and it would cost $1500. I use my laptop for web browsing, Geforce Now, YouTube, and Netflix. I like the weight of the air better but I also don't mind the better screen of the MacBook Pro. Does the 120hz, faster chip, and greater brightness outweigh the weight of the MacBook air?
For what it's worth, I have both of them. The M2 pro (MBP 14") for work and the M3 air (15") for personal use.
I tend to prefer the Air over the Pro. But in general, for my usecases they pretty much equal out.
 
Just chiming in but I love and have moved to exclusively getting refurbished computers from Apple because they’re basically new and prices are better than when stuff goes on sale at best buy or Amazon. Thankfully I have a friend who works for Apple and is willing to share their F&F discount so I get an extra 15% off refurbished so it’s almost a no brainer. My M2 MBA has been a great daily driver for regular tasks and some work-from-home stuff.
If this person is a student, isn't the student discount the same or lower price than an Apple rerun?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
Either machine will do fine for the applications you mention but eh…. Are you planning to do more in college than GeForce now, YouTube and Netflix?

That might be a good idea and if so, maybe throw those intended use cases into the mix for your buying decision. ;)
It’s probably gonna be a primary tv to be honest
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boing123
No. If you're using this machine mostly for University coursework, the vast majority of the slowness will be on your side - thinking about the words to use if you're writing essays, searching for the correct journal articles to cite, hand copying information from books to answer problems, etc.

When I was in my graduate program, I was using a MacBook Air 2015/2017, and then I ended up upgrading to an M1 MacBook Air. I didn't see too much of a speed improvement all things considered.

One thing that did speed up my workflow is that I used to download textbooks from certain websites, and then run the textbooks through an OCR program. The OCR program used to take about 2 hours on the MacBook Air 2015/2017, and it reduced the time to about 20 minutes on the M1.
Gotcha so for my use case they would be the same speed?
 
Here's my opinion (as someone who recently finished grad school):

1. BEFORE BUYING ANYTHING, talk to your potential professors AND your school admin. Some courses may require special "Windows only" software programs, OR Windows only web browsers.

2. Are Apple products used within the industry you're studying? Use what the industry uses. Since you're a business major, I expect Macs to be accepted, but you never know..

NOW assuming your professors and admin say "Macs are cool, use them!"...

I would recommend the MacBook Air M3.

1. It's lighter. You'll be carrying your computer to classes, library, study halls, etc, and every ounce counts.
2. The battery life is longer. There's no reason to bring your charger with you.
3. It's more reliable. There's no moving parts unlike a MacBook Pro.
4. ASSUMING you won't need sustained power for your classes, the MacBook Air is faster.
5. The MacBook Air is newer, so it'll get updates longer.

The only potential downside to a MacBook Air is that it can only connect to two external monitor, unlike four for the MacBook Pros (source: https://support.apple.com/guide/macbook-air/use-an-external-display-apd8cdd74f57/mac#). I doubt you'll need to connect to more than two external monitors though.
Would it be a big deal if I use the air as a tv?
 
Correct, in that one sense yes, the M3 chip is more future proof.

Presumably, all the streaming sites like Max, YouTube, Netflix, AppleTV are adopting AV1 now, and not just because of technological progress and to save server costs, but because it’s royalty free as well, unlike H.265, which these companies have to pay royalties per device or per subscriber.

Still, even in 5 years many or most devices will still not have AV1 decoders, because people are slow to buy new computers and new TVs or streaming boxes, so streaming companies will still need to stream to us older devices in H.265, so it’s not like we can’t use Netflix in 5 years. Your M3 will have a little bit higher quality media is all.

EDIT: I'm attaching a photo that shows quality differences at the same bitrate. The middle image is encoded with VP9, but that is nearly equivalent to H.265 (HEVC), so look at how much better AV1 is on the right. Notice the fingers aren't lost in compression artifacts, and the tiles are much more detailed and consistent despite compression.
Is the av1 thing a big deal for rn?
 
Either machine will do fine for the applications you mention but eh…. Are you planning to do more in college than GeForce now, YouTube and Netflix?

That might be a good idea and if so, maybe throw those intended use cases into the mix for your buying decision. ;)
Idek tbh
 
Here's my opinion (as someone who recently finished grad school):

1. BEFORE BUYING ANYTHING, talk to your potential professors AND your school admin. Some courses may require special "Windows only" software programs, OR Windows only web browsers.

2. Are Apple products used within the industry you're studying? Use what the industry uses. Since you're a business major, I expect Macs to be accepted, but you never know..

NOW assuming your professors and admin say "Macs are cool, use them!"...

I would recommend the MacBook Air M3.

1. It's lighter. You'll be carrying your computer to classes, library, study halls, etc, and every ounce counts.
2. The battery life is longer. There's no reason to bring your charger with you.
3. It's more reliable. There's no moving parts unlike a MacBook Pro.
4. ASSUMING you won't need sustained power for your classes, the MacBook Air is faster.
5. The MacBook Air is newer, so it'll get updates longer.

The only potential downside to a MacBook Air is that it can only connect to two external monitor, unlike four for the MacBook Pros (source: https://support.apple.com/guide/macbook-air/use-an-external-display-apd8cdd74f57/mac#). I doubt you'll need to connect to more than two external monitors though.
I wouldn’t even have a monties to display to that wouldn’t affect me and is the better screen worth the drawback of being heavier for the pro?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaperMag
Is the av1 thing a big deal for rn?
To picture purists streaming content on 55-inch TVs, yes.

To common folk streaming content on a 13/14 inch screen, less so. Most wouldn’t notice as most people are bad at detecting picture quality unless they’re looking at an A/B test side by side.

Myself, I wouldn’t buy an Air over a Pro simply for AV1 hardware decoding. I’m not suggesting it. It’s just a nice little feature to have since you’re streaming NVIDIA GeForce Now. But the Pro has 120Hz VRR and 60% faster GPU so it’s going to win with local gaming, though, so keep that in mind.
 
Gotcha so for my use case they would be the same speed?
For your use case, it'll be about the same speed. I was a Project Management major myself, which required a lot of typing. The 2017 MacBook Air didn't break a sweat unless I was OCR-ing those books. My 2020 M1 MacBook Air didn't break a sweat at all - EXCEPT when I had to boot into Windows via Parallels
 
Is the av1 thing a big deal for rn?
I don't think the AV1 is ever going to be a big deal on a 13 or 15" display. By the time websites like Netflix or Apple TV stop supporting the older protocol, the machine won't be getting updates and it'll be difficult to go online with it (imagine streaming videos using a 2008 MacBook Pro today, for example).
 
To picture purists streaming content on 55-inch TVs, yes.

To common folk streaming content on a 13/14 inch screen, less so. Most wouldn’t notice as most people are bad at detecting picture quality unless they’re looking at an A/B test side by side.

Myself, I wouldn’t buy an Air over a Pro simply for AV1 hardware decoding. I’m not suggesting it. It’s just a nice little feature to have since you’re streaming NVIDIA GeForce Now. But the Pro has 120Hz VRR and 60% faster GPU so it’s going to win with local gaming, though, so keep that in mind.
I heard the single core is a decent amount faster on the m3 but I think mostly what I do I wouldn’t even notice the difference in single core and to a none trained eye is Av1 important?
 
For your use case, it'll be about the same speed. I was a Project Management major myself, which required a lot of typing. The 2017 MacBook Air didn't break a sweat unless I was OCR-ing those books. My 2020 M1 MacBook Air didn't break a sweat at all - EXCEPT when I had to boot into Windows via Parallels
My i3 mac is on its last ones
 
No it wouldn't be (assuming you mean like streaming shows from Netflix, Apple TV, etc). It'll just be very overpriced that's all.
No it’s mostly for work but in my dorm I’ll probably use it as my personal tv also
 
I heard the single core is a decent amount faster on the m3 but I think mostly what I do I wouldn’t even notice the difference in single core and to a none trained eye is Av1 important?
Most things are single-threaded tasks, meaning one core will work on it, so having more performance cores isn't going to help most tasks. The M3 has 4 efficiency cores and 4 performance cores—anyway—which I would estimate to be way more than most people need, certainly for your use cases, especially for single-threaded tasks. Only when you start using apps that have specific multi-threaded operation for performance reasons (eg. video editing, audio production, 3D production) does having more performance cores help complete a task.

But the M3 has a multiscore of 11959 and the M2 Pro has a multiscore of 12144 so in many tasks they will behave similarly even if multithreaded.

And yes, the m3 has an even faster single-core score by about 15%—but thats not noticeable. Some task taking 2.8 seconds or taking 2.4 seconds will feel exactly the same to you. What matters to you is that either an M2 Pro or M3 chip will both be about 3x faster for you than the i3 2020 Air you're currently using. So performance wise, for your use case, either laptop is taking you into the future, so to speak.

I want to say something in the most friendly way possible, because I overthink and over-research everything I do, so I say this as a fellow overthinker—I think you're overthinking this—because you're probably a very rational person and this purchase is an expensive one so you want the best fit. But since you've surpassed the threshold—both laptops will serve you super well—the best way to make a decision is to just go with your feelings and intuition. Use the force! Remember, you can change your mind and return the device—Apple gives you 14-days.

When I finally made the switch to Apple Silicon from my Intel MacBook Pro, I couldn't decide between a more powerful Mac Studio or an M2 Air. I had to buy both. I had to run my apps using both. I had to feel the Air and walk around with it to go, "I want that!" You're going to need to go to the Apple Store again, or just buy one and try it. It's like choosing a puppy—you gotta make eye contact and go with your gut on which one to take home.

(AV1—as I mentioned before—is nice to have for technical reasons, especially if you're going to be streaming a game in AV1 on a big 4K screen—but to an untrained eye on a 13/14-inch screen you probably won't notice)
 
Most things are single-threaded tasks, meaning one core will work on it, so having more performance cores isn't going to help most tasks. The M3 has 4 efficiency cores and 4 performance cores—anyway—which I would estimate to be way more than most people need, certainly for your use cases, especially for single-threaded tasks. Only when you start using apps that have specific multi-threaded operation for performance reasons (eg. video editing, audio production, 3D production) does having more performance cores help complete a task.

But the M3 has a multiscore of 11959 and the M2 Pro has a multiscore of 12144 so in many tasks they will behave similarly even if multithreaded.

And yes, the m3 has an even faster single-core score by about 15%—but thats not noticeable. Some task taking 2.8 seconds or taking 2.4 seconds will feel exactly the same to you. What matters to you is that either an M2 Pro or M3 chip will both be about 3x faster for you than the i3 2020 Air you're currently using. So performance wise, for your use case, either laptop is taking you into the future, so to speak.

I want to say something in the most friendly way possible, because I overthink and over-research everything I do, so I say this as a fellow overthinker—I think you're overthinking this—because you're probably a very rational person and this purchase is an expensive one so you want the best fit. But since you've surpassed the threshold—both laptops will serve you super well—the best way to make a decision is to just go with your feelings and intuition. Use the force! Remember, you can change your mind and return the device—Apple gives you 14-days.

When I finally made the switch to Apple Silicon from my Intel MacBook Pro, I couldn't decide between a more powerful Mac Studio or an M2 Air. I had to buy both. I had to run my apps using both. I had to feel the Air and walk around with it to go, "I want that!" You're going to need to go to the Apple Store again, or just buy one and try it. It's like choosing a puppy—you gotta make eye contact and go with your gut on which one to take home.

(AV1—as I mentioned before—is nice to have for technical reasons, especially if you're going to be streaming a game in AV1 on a big 4K screen—but to an untrained eye on a 13/14-inch screen you probably won't notice)
Thanks man, I am overthinking thsi, I’m gonna go with the air bc it’s lighter and I like the form factor bc it’s less bulky and slimmer
 
I don't think the AV1 is ever going to be a big deal on a 13 or 15" display. By the time websites like Netflix or Apple TV stop supporting the older protocol, the machine won't be getting updates and it'll be difficult to go online with it (imagine streaming videos using a 2008 MacBook Pro today, for example).
In summary, I gave a similar answer. But there is some nuance to the answer I want to bring up.

Due to adaptive bit rate (ABR) streaming, we're not watching one quality throughout, but multiple qualities of video throughout, depending on the quality of our connection—which varies many times throughout even a 10 minute youtube video, or say a live Twitch stream or Youtube event. Less so if you have a solid connection, but many people around the world have inconsistent connections, especially if their internet is cellular-based, and they are moving on a bus throughout a city and in between buildings and cell towers, so AV1 will make a huge difference in improving quality of image when bitrate is low even on smaller displays like tablets and phones. It handles internet quality variation much better.

But if someone is fine with current H.265 streaming at home with a solid 1 Gbps connection, then theres no reason to rush to the Apple Store simply for AV1 decoding.

Now to the people with 4K TVs, an Apple TV 4K box, and a subscription to AppleTV+, when Apple releases the new Apple TV 4K box with AVI support, you better run out and get it asap because you'll be getting a better bitrate at the same internet speed, or better quality at the same bitrate. AppleTV+ delivers something like 4x better quality image than Netflix so you're going to see AV1 being used beautifully—especially in dark scenes because compression really degrades dark scenes and shadow detail. Bitrate is important, which is why I'd rather watch 1080p Blu-ray than 4K streaming via Netflix, in some movies.

How Netflix will use AV1, they may simply cut the bitrate by 30% to save on content delivery costs because they are cheap as hell and pride themselves on delivering the worst quality video out of all the streaming networks (even though they charge extra for 4K delivery).

I do think AV1 decoding is important in and of itself, but is it important to the user...probably not the general users. But if streaming Twitch or streaming a game via NVIDIA GeForce, probably yes its a bonus because detail matters more in games than watching The Office or Is It Cake? season 2.
 
If this person is a student, isn't the student discount the same or lower price than an Apple rerun?
Student discount is only 10% so the refurbished store is great discount. I don’t believe the student discount works for the refurb store either so unless you absolutely want brand spanking new (which you basically get with refurb from Apple), refurb is the best deal overall
 
Either machine will do fine for the applications you mention but eh…. Are you planning to do more in college than GeForce now, YouTube and Netflix?

That might be a good idea and if so, maybe throw those intended use cases into the mix for your buying decision. ;)
nah im using ge force now less and less now thinking about ut
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.