Fast enough for my needs. And I don't hear the fans.Is it fast?
Fast enough for my needs. And I don't hear the fans.Is it fast?
In summary, I gave a similar answer. But there is some nuance to the answer I want to bring up.
Due to adaptive bit rate (ABR) streaming, we're not watching one quality throughout, but multiple qualities of video throughout, depending on the quality of our connection—which varies many times throughout even a 10 minute youtube video, or say a live Twitch stream or Youtube event. Less so if you have a solid connection, but many people around the world have inconsistent connections, especially if their internet is cellular-based, and they are moving on a bus throughout a city and in between buildings and cell towers, so AV1 will make a huge difference in improving quality of image when bitrate is low even on smaller displays like tablets and phones. It handles internet quality variation much better.
But if someone is fine with current H.265 streaming at home with a solid 1 Gbps connection, then theres no reason to rush to the Apple Store simply for AV1 decoding.
Now to the people with 4K TVs, an Apple TV 4K box, and a subscription to AppleTV+, when Apple releases the new Apple TV 4K box with AVI support, you better run out and get it asap because you'll be getting a better bitrate at the same internet speed, or better quality at the same bitrate. AppleTV+ delivers something like 4x better quality image than Netflix so you're going to see AV1 being used beautifully—especially in dark scenes because compression really degrades dark scenes and shadow detail. Bitrate is important, which is why I'd rather watch 1080p Blu-ray than 4K streaming via Netflix, in some movies.
How Netflix will use AV1, they may simply cut the bitrate by 30% to save on content delivery costs because they are cheap as hell and pride themselves on delivering the worst quality video out of all the streaming networks (even though they charge extra for 4K delivery).
I do think AV1 decoding is important in and of itself, but is it important to the user...probably not the general users. But if streaming Twitch or streaming a game via NVIDIA GeForce, probably yes its a bonus because detail matters more in games than watching The Office or Is It Cake? season 2.
That’s fair but I’m surprised because you seem to be great with computers, maybe better than most people. What about a TV or a streaming device is hard to navigate? Is it the linearity of it? I do find some apps quite bad. Like if I’m looking for my wishlist, some apps obnoxiously make it very difficult to find.I guess that's right. I don't watch videos or movies or TV at all. I tried using Apple TV (the App) and I couldn't figure it out, which was sad because my son really liked one of the shows there. I can't figure out how to use a regular TV either. I'm guessing if a person has a deep passion about TV and TV shows (or movies?) it's a good thing, otherwise not.
100% NO! An iPad would be the worst thing I can suggest for him.Based on what you listed for uses sounds like you’d be better off with an iPad
No. Fans seldom come on, and only come on if the processors are driven really hard. The MBA driven that hard simply throttles to cope with the excess heat, which is worse than the (inoffensive IMO) fans. Fans are a very good thing. There are good reasons that they are integral to the higher end laptops.Are the fans a problem for the noise?
Ah okay well still none of that stuff uses any power so I’d get the newest air.100% NO! An iPad would be the worst thing I can suggest for him.
1. He will need a good multitasking operating system to have at least the following on the screen at the same time:
- Microsoft Word (for page layout)
- Microsoft Excel (for his assignments, he's doing something with business)
- Preview (to read journals)
- Scrivener (to collect notes and to write papers)
- Google Drive for version control
- Zotero as a reference manager (you can drag and drop journal PDF files and it'll automatically complete the reference).
An iPad will be a complete mess. Scrivener does not work correctly on the ipad. You can't have multiple windows open on an iPad. Zotero doesn't allow easy drag and drop on the iPad. Printing can be difficult as well, and I don't think an iPad can have more than one external monitor attached.
Plus, depending on the textbook, some textbooks require special software programs to be installed on the computer, which clearly won't work on an iPad either.
Are u for the air or the pro?100% NO! An iPad would be the worst thing I can suggest for him.
1. He will need a good multitasking operating system to have at least the following on the screen at the same time:
- Microsoft Word (for page layout)
- Microsoft Excel (for his assignments, he's doing something with business)
- Preview (to read journals)
- Scrivener (to collect notes and to write papers)
- Google Drive for version control
- Zotero as a reference manager (you can drag and drop journal PDF files and it'll automatically complete the reference).
An iPad will be a complete mess. Scrivener does not work correctly on the ipad. You can't have multiple windows open on an iPad. Zotero doesn't allow easy drag and drop on the iPad. Printing can be difficult as well, and I don't think an iPad can have more than one external monitor attached.
Plus, depending on the textbook, some textbooks require special software programs to be installed on the computer, which clearly won't work on an iPad either.
I'm for the Air because of the weight, battery life, and new-ness.Are u for the air or the pro?
I heard the battery is better on the proI'm for the Air because of the weight, battery life, and new-ness.
The airs come out in the spring, and I found a older pro on Apple I don’t need the bestAnother suggestion: You survived this long on the i3. Hold on a little longer and you'll be able to get an M4 Mac in autumn, preventing buyer's remorse by getting the latest and greatest there is ;-)
When the M3 Air is under normal operation—its 3x faster than their current Intel Air, and when its throttling—its still about 3x faster than their current Intel Air. OP isn't going to be doing any sustained tasks, and if they ever do, it will likely be so infrequent to not matter, and still it will be operating 80-90% normal speed quite likely.No. Fans seldom come on, and only come on if the processors are driven really hard. The MBA driven that hard simply throttles to cope with the excess heat, which is worse than the (inoffensive IMO) fans. Fans are a very good thing. There are good reasons that they are integral to the higher end laptops.
Apple lists the following battery life:I heard the battery is better on the pro
yepApple lists the following battery life:
So the M3 Air wins.
- M3 Air: Up to 15 hours wireless web
- M2 Pro MBP: Up to 12 hours wireless web
You ask: "Have you ever heard an iPhone or iPad user wish it had fans?" and claim that "We're in a new era where fans are no required."When the M3 Air is under normal operation—its 3x faster than their current Intel Air, and when its throttling—its still about 3x faster than their current Intel Air. OP isn't going to be doing any sustained tasks, and if they ever do, it will likely be so infrequent to not matter, and still it will be operating 80-90% normal speed quite likely.
Have you ever heard an iPhone or iPad user wish it had fans?
We're in a new era where fans are no required.
actually i saw a m3 pro for a $100 more than the m2 pro, and now im considering the m3 air vs the m3 pro mac pro which one do you suggest im mostly a light user, but im going into college and its probaly gonna be my main tv tbhYou ask: "Have you ever heard an iPhone or iPad user wish it had fans?" and claim that "We're in a new era where fans are no required."
Frequently we see iPhone and/or iPad users wishing for more power and frequently we see iPhone and/or iPad users commenting on devices being too hot. More power would require more heat removal, which requires fans as we get higher up in power levels with laptops that physically have room for fans.
Personally I tend toward preferring the more competent MBP in pretty much every instance. If "TV" usage is important I would think that the better display and better speakers of the MBP would be particularly relevant.actually i saw a m3 pro for a $100 more than the m2 pro, and now im considering the m3 air vs the m3 pro mac pro which one do you suggest im mostly a light user, but im going into college and its probaly gonna be my main tv tbh
Gotcha I’m going into college, andPersonally I tend toward preferring the more competent MBP in pretty much every instance. If "TV" usage is important I would think that the better display and better speakers of the MBP would be particularly relevant.
Note that one's eyes/brain and ears/brain become trained over time to appreciate the differences that present with better display and speaker quality. But said training only happens with better quality hardware. And said training can be a curse because once one's eyes/brain and ears/brain become trained, poor hardware can become quite offensive...
Absolutely nobody wants fans in their iPhone. You confuse the iPhone 15 bug. Read here.Frequently we see iPhone and/or iPad users wishing for more power and frequently we see iPhone and/or iPad users commenting on devices being too hot.
If you're getting it to be a great laptop for a business major, get the Air—It's thin, light, charming and sophisticated.actually i saw a m3 pro for a $100 more than the m2 pro, and now im considering the m3 air vs the m3 pro mac pro which one do you suggest im mostly a light user, but im going into college and its probaly gonna be my main tv tbh
Both choices have excellent real-world battery life. Picking nits about battery life of devices when both chaoice are this strong is poor decision making. Instead we should look at the many differences that are substantive and do matter: MBP better display, MBP better speakers, MBP more ports, MBP better bandwidth, etc.; MBA is lighter.Apple lists the following battery life:
So the M3 Air wins.
- M3 Air: Up to 15 hours wireless web
- M2 Pro MBP: Up to 12 hours wireless web
I disagree with your response.Both choices have excellent real-world battery life. Picking nits about battery life of devices when both chaoiceat are this strong is poor decision making.
Why does my simple comment—innocently clarifying that the MacBook Air has up to 25% more battery life—offend you so much that you forget an entire 5 forum pages are of us paying discussion to all those criteria—display, speakers, ports, performance?Instead we should look at the many differences the matter. MBP better display, MBP better speakers, MBP more ports, MBP better bandwidth, MBA is lighter, etc.
Absolutely nobody wants fans in their iPhone. You confuse the iPhone 15 bug. Read here.
Do high-wattage chips need active cooling? Of course!
But general computing does not. iPhones, iPads, and MacBook Airs don't have fans—3 of the best products in the world, arguably.