Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nquinn

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2020
829
621
I am not making any excuses. I am trying to understand why a chip with 33% wider execution backend and 50% more branch units only achieves 3-5% higher IPC. Either Apple has royally botched up something inside that CPU, or their IPC is already so high that expecting more substantial gains is unreasonable.

Also, AMD is hardly a good example. Zen4 IPC is on par with Apple A12. Of course it's easier for AMD to get notable IPC improvements. Hell, they got a decent IPC improvement simply from increasing the cache size. They are basically repeating steps Apple did years ago. At some point the bag of tricks is empty.



I am not sure what you are basing all these speculations on. Analysis (however limited) on A17 u-arch is available. We know that this is Apple's first really new microarchitecture in many years, and we know that it's substantially wider than Firestorm and its iterations. It is extremely unlikely that Apple will have another massive micro-architecture update within a year. Maybe some minor tweaks that help extract more IPC from that wide core, sure, that cannot be discounted. But A17 is the basis for the next few years at least.



What's the difference? It's ultimately the same thing. On the fundamental level, a modern super-scalar CPU core is multi-device machine trying to concurrently chop away on a serial program in the most efficient way.

Also not to mention - at what point does it not become worth it? Like is it worth pouring hundreds of millions or billions into R&D just to return +3% more IPC?

I'm running an M1 Max (24 core igpu) right now and don't plan to upgrade for like 7yrs+ if this rate of improvement continues.
 

Populus

macrumors 603
Aug 24, 2012
5,941
8,411
Spain, Europe
Three new M3 chips! Released at the same time!

I missed John Srouji at the presentation of the A17 Pro.

Seems like the GPU is going tho be the star of the show! Apparently it has some nice, interesting features aside from the expected Ray Tracing.

AV1 hardware decoding.

New MacBook Pro, now starting with just an M3… Will it be cheaper?
 
Last edited:

TigeRick

macrumors regular
Oct 20, 2012
144
153
Malaysia
While waiting for M3 family to arrive, there is some discussion about how Apple going to implement the memory bus design. Below is standard config with different memory bus support. Both LPDDR5 and LPDDR5x are sharing similar memory specifications and configurations. Apple so far has only validated 96Gb memory density for M2 family with LPDDR5 support. That's why maximum memory size for MBA is 24GB; but not for MBP with M2 Pro cause Apple wants you to upgrade to M2 Max if you want more memory size.


Memory DensityMemory Size Per Chip x64128-bit Memory Bus256-bit Memory Bus512-bit Memory Bus
Memory Chips Required2 pcs4 pcs8 pcs
32Gb4 GB8 GB16 GB32 GB
48Gb6 GB12 GB24 GB48 GB
64Gb8 GB16 GB32 GB64 GB
96Gb12 GB24 GB48 GB96 GB
128Gb16 GB32 GB64 GB128 GB

128Gb memory density would be next upgrades for M3 family; with M3 Max most likely support up to 128GB. But where is the rumored 12GB fit in? Some users thought Apple would increase the memory bus to accommodate extra 4GB of memory. I don't think so and I believe Apple is currently testing mixture of different memory size with same memory bus. Below is my thought of how Apple going to implement:

Total Memory SizeM3 128-bit (2 Chips)Size UpM3 Pro 256-bit (4 Chips)Size UpM3 Max 512-bit (8 Chips)Size Up
12 GB4 GB + 8 GB OR
6 GB * 2
Base
24 GB12 GB * 2+ 12 GB4GB + 4GB + 8GB + 8GB OR
6 GB * 4
Base
32 GB16 GB * 2+ 8 GB
36 GB8GB + 8GB + 8GB + 12GB+ 12 GB
48 GB12 GB * 4+ 12 GB4+4+4+4+8+8+8+8 OR
6 GB * 8
Base
64 GB16 GB * 4+ 16 GB8 GB * 8+ 16 GB
96 GB12 GB * 8+ 32 GB
128 GB16 GB * 8+ 32 GB

  • Apple will most likely increase the base memory size from 8GB to 12GB for M3; 16GB to 24GB for M3 Pro and 32GB to 48GB for M3 Max.
  • As for 32GB memory support of M3, Apple might not validate it cause the increment is less than 12GB. That's why I also suspect M3 only support LPDDR5 as the rumored specs are similar with M2. M3 SoC is available for 12GB and 24GB memory config only. Now anyone wants to guess how much Apple going to charge for extra 12GB memory upgrades? :p
  • M3 Pro most likely support 24GB and 36GB memory size. If you want more memory support, then M3 Max with 48GB is your only choice, very Apple way :rolleyes:
  • We should know whether I am correct when Apple announces first Max with M3 in two month times 😅
Above are my speculation of RAM configuration, let's see results
 

Populus

macrumors 603
Aug 24, 2012
5,941
8,411
Spain, Europe
They said they reduce the fingerprints
Yeah. I heard that while typing my previous message, but I wasn’t paying enough attention, so I thought “how the hell have they linked the new color with a reduced carbon fingerprint?”

EDIT: Done. 30 minutes of event. New MacBook Pros, and new iMac, with the M3 SoC family.
I’m curious to see if the M3 starts at 8GB or 12GB or RAM
 

Johnny Steps

macrumors 6502a
Jun 29, 2011
606
570
So what happens if you bought a MacBook Pro earlier this month and this happens a few days outside of the return window? Are you basically screwed lol? Asking for a friend…
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,521
19,675
No on-chip GPU memory, just Dynamic Caching of the UMA RAM in regards to GPU usage of said UMA RAM...

There has always been on-chip memory (core private memory and caches). Dynamic Caching refers to the use of on-core memory by the shaders. It has nothing to do with UMA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diamond.g

Confused-User

macrumors 6502a
Oct 14, 2014
852
987
Argh. No mention of clocks at all in their tech specs page. Waiting for the other shoe to drop.

In the meantime, a few interesting notes. The M3 non-Pro 14" has only two TB ports, as you'd expect. And, more surprisingly, the M3 Max cut-down part loses a memory channel!

RAM and SSD prices have declined, if not as much as I'd like- SSD now starts at 512GB, so that lower prices a bit. RAM pricing is slightly improved. 128GB max configuration is a bit disappointing but expected. No mention of bus speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.