I see no evidence of barryk's micropatcher attempting to insert the legacy usb support into the process. Someone is going to have to rebuild the the internal dmg's in the installer to have that support.
Hello Jhowarth,
Just for clarity, I only used barrykn’s mciropatcher to install BigSur -beta2 (successfully) on iMac 13,2 .
I did not attempt to use it on the MacBook Pro 5,2, knowing that the micropatcher could not “inject” USB support on that machine.
I used internal drive in the MacBook Pro 5,2 ,running Catalina OS, to try to install BigSur onto a separate partition on same *internal* drive; Asentientbot’s Hax3.app, Jackluke’s Prelinked Fix4 (beta1) script, and terminal commands listed in this thread, were basis for that installation.
Oddly, I was able to install BigSur Beta1 on said MAcBook Pro 5,2, and it worked until the login window; the computer entered a loop where login window would appear, disappear ,and reappear; “reduce transparency” command would have remedied this (discovered that a bit late), but Beta2 “beckoned”.
[automerge]1594798640[/automerge]
As for the MBP5,2, I have an equivalent machine, and could install with Hax3.app, both beta 1 and beta 2 - but only to internal disk, NOT to one connected via USB. When on USB, I observed the same symptom as you did.
Is yours on USB?
For Catalina, jackluke had made an OpenCore loader which injects legacy USB into the (OTA) installation process on USB disks. The same doesn't work (yet?) for BS. Legacy USB can be injected into the installed system though.
So unfortunately I had to hook my BS testing disk on SATA for installation of BS. Afterwards, it can live on USB for further installation steps (patches), booting and running. I used jackluke's prelinkedkernel fix4.command and can run BS on MBP5,2 (slowly without acceleration, but good enough for testing. Photos 6.0 crashes.)
(MBP5,2 17" mid 2009, 2.8GHz Penryn T9600, Nvidia 9600M GT, 8GB, APFS ROM patch applied. APFS SSD Samsung 860 EVO for production / 840 for testing, with Catalina 10.15.5.02 / Big Sur 10.16.0 beta, resp.)
Hello hvds,
I did use internal, SATA connected SSD, as the source of installation (from Catalina partition), in an attempt to install BigSur beta2 on second (separate partition) on same SSD. No USB disks, or thumb drives were used, precisely for the reasons you listed in your response. I did manage to install BigSur Beta1, by method you described, and it worked, until the login-window loop issue occurred; I could have used “reduce transparency” command to succeed, but, alas, Beta 2 appeared … Not sure why install did not work with Beta2.