Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
For what its worth. Monterey still runs fine on a test disk. Still haven't upgraded from 11.6.3 yet. When I do decide to upgrade is it best via OTA software update or bootable installer? Monterey was a fresh wipe/install on the test disk with 12.0.

Screen Shot 2022-02-04 at 7.49.26 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
Anyone on 12.3b1 on a 4,1 or 5,1 cMP lately?
I only noticed some 3,1 owner reporting trouble and then success with the PM fix in 0.4.2N.
I sussessfully updated from macOS 12.2 (final) to 12.3 Beta on my CMP 5.1 (flashed 2009), using config that compiled by OCLP 0.4.2NB (now released)
 
Out of curiosity, could someone post an SSD performance test (Aja or blackmagicspeedtest) of their mbr 13" mid 2012 system please. I wonder if an SSD upgrade could be worthwhile apart from gaining some more space.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2022-02-05 at 10.53.53.png
    Screenshot 2022-02-05 at 10.53.53.png
    1 MB · Views: 88
Out of curiosity, could someone post an SSD performance test (Aja or blackmagicspeedtest) of their mbr 13" mid 2012 system please. I wonder if an SSD upgrade could be worthwhile apart from gaining some more space.
This number tells you NOTHING about the speedup when using an SSD. It is all about access time and not about streaming performance, which comes only into play if you want it store terabytes of data onto the disk. But tell me how to feed that amount of data into the disk faster than 300mbyte/s
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larsvonhier
Seems strange that is fails to find "ARM base system patches" - OCLP people should take a look at this, if it repeats to fail like this while installing onto a formatted disk.
Now happened for the third time, that it failed with „12 minutes remaining“.
After that there are 12,09 GB written to the harddisk :/

Any ideas apart from HDD is a bad idea? I have only one SSD here and there is my productive Catalina on it
 
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
Now happened for the third time, that it failed with „12 minutes remaining“.
After that there are 12,09 GB written to the harddisk :/

Any ideas apart from HDD is a bad idea? I have only one SSD here and there is my productive Catalina on it


It Suppose to be work ! I have many Installation on External Mechanical HD
Make sur formating the HD like this on your mac before booting and installing from USB Install Media

 
Dear All,

I have an iMac13,1 with OCLP 0.4.2, Monterey 12.2 and everytime I boot up, I run into the following issue: "Waiting for remote debugger connection" and the system freezes. (See screenshot). I tried re-patching, but no success. Any solution for that?

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2641.jpg
    IMG_2641.jpg
    582.1 KB · Views: 54
  • Like
Reactions: TimothyR734
This number tells you NOTHING about the speedup when using an SSD. It is all about access time and not about streaming performance, which comes only into play if you want it store terabytes of data onto the disk. But tell me how to feed that amount of data into the disk faster than 300mbyte/s
Absolutely right, and the seek/access times will make a huge difference, even on SATA-1 interfaces. If you once booted your system and ran apps from SSD and you go back to spinning drives, you really think your computer is defective in some way. Had that experience a lot of times when reverting back for test purposes or installation experiments with "unsupported" builds on old Macs.
 
If I were to use OCLP to install Monterey on my iMac 15,1 (27 inch late 2014), will I get Mission Control (once it's out of beta) or is there an additional hardware requirement that won't be met?

(I only care about Mission Control so I won't bother otherwise.)
 
Screen Shot 2022-02-05 at 11.54.17.jpg
yes mission control works in macOS Monterey
If I were to use OCLP to install Monterey on my iMac 15,1 (27 inch late 2014), will I get Mission Control (once it's out of beta) or is there an additional hardware requirement that won't be met?

(I only care about Mission Control so I won't bother otherwise.)
 
OK so try to format Like this
View attachment 1954736
then Installer macOS will be convert in APFS during the process installation
Well :D
What should I say…
So, first of all, that indeed was a superb trick! The installation was again on „12 minutes remaining“ for a very long time but then it jumped to 18minutes, then 1h 18min, then it went on, the MBP restarted.
Then the progress bar with the Apple logo appeared.
There it ended with „Less than a minute remaining“…
However, after 4 hours it still showed this :(
I cancelled the installation now.

Any ideas, what is wrong, if „Less than a minute remaining“ never goes away?
 
Well :D
What should I say…
So, first of all, that indeed was a superb trick! The installation was again on „12 minutes remaining“ for a very long time but then it jumped to 18minutes, then 1h 18min, then it went on, the MBP restarted.
Then the progress bar with the Apple logo appeared.
There it ended with „Less than a minute remaining“…
However, after 4 hours it still showed this :(
I cancelled the installation now.

Any ideas, what is wrong, if „Less than a minute remaining“ never goes away?
Check anyway if all macOS Monterey is Install and complet installation?
 
Check anyway if all macOS Monterey is Install and complet installation?
There was no bootable OS after my „forced shutdown“.
Just the EFI Installer from my bootable stick.

Disk utility showed 2 APFS volumes: HDD and HDD Data. HDD Data had 12Gb on it
 
If I were to use OCLP to install Monterey on my iMac 15,1 (27 inch late 2014), will I get Mission Control (once it's out of beta) or is there an additional hardware requirement that won't be met?

(I only care about Mission Control so I won't bother otherwise.)
Do you mean ”universal control” ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mwidjaya
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.