You said " The only time the manufacturer bears responsibility is when they (either deliberately or accidentally) misrepresent the product they're selling."
So, tell me, what's the nits "representation" here?
300? 250?
Can you link me the individual official specs of the MBA 2018?
And how about this:
"That's not the only difference we noticed. Laptop Mag found the new MacBook Air's screen brightness is capped at 234 nits, while the 13-inch MacBook Pro averages 458 nits. Not only that, but the previous generation MacBook Air measured in at 336 nits of brightness. "
https://appleinsider.com/articles/1...rsus-13-inch-macbook-pro-and-2017-macbook-air
Tell me, how it's my fault not knowing the nits?
Look here and tell me, where are the MBA nits?
Macbook Air 2018(no nits info):
https://www.apple.com/uk/macbook-air/specs/
But they give that info about macbooks, ipads and imacs:
Macbook pro (500 nits):
https://www.apple.com/uk/macbook-pro/specs/
Imac (500 nits):
https://www.apple.com/uk/imac/specs/
Imac pro (500 nits):
https://www.apple.com/uk/imac-pro/specs/
Ipad pro (600 nits):
https://www.apple.com/uk/ipad-pro/specs/
Why didn't you do all this research before?
Again to my point about how previous laptops have performed. From your own example:
The 2017 MBA article you referenced said: "It outshines the 290-nit category average".
So again my question would be did all your laptops from years past give you headaches? Why now? The average from years past has been a lot lower than the current Apple Pro models. Why it it now a problem?