I disagree, again.
Like i said before, nits are factual entities.
Nits are used to describe the brightness of computer displays. They are objective.
Your subjective perception of the nits is legally irrelevant.
The problem with this argument is that although you are right that the luminance value or "nits" output is a very objective measurement, the number of nits you actually need to comfortably work in environment of your choice is a very subjective one.
The Macbook Air 2018 has average brightness, lower than some other laptops Apple sell. Especially compared to latest generation of Macbook Pro. All reviews and even some Apple marketing materials are clear about that. Many users won't notice any difference until they look side by side.
So if this is such an important feature don't buy it and buy a MBP instead.
I don't see any Apple fault here...
[doublepost=1545060145][/doublepost]My modest theory about the screen brightness:
1. The screen can do 300 nits
2. It is somehow reduced by the firmware in order to meet the same battery life targets as the previous model (apple declare all battery tests are done with display brightness set to 12 clicks from bottom or 75% rather than at specific nits level).
3. As result of the above no "nits" rating is specified in the tech specs in order to not give false data.
Luckily, Apple has a plenty of retail stores to demonstrate Macbooks, generous return policies for those not satisfied. And there is a hundreds of 3rd party reviews all over the internet. Nobody is forced to buy the Macbook Air if not comfortable with display quality. Most people will be fine. For a few is better to look for a different model.
No nitgate for me.