all the better to grip it! I have a touch and a BB. My BB is far easier to hold onto. sure it weighs more, but the touch is very easy to drop. drop it on the wrong surface and all the "coolness" of that Apple product vanishes in an instant. Apple fans really, really dig thinness, don't they? Product anorexia.![]()
Is this sarcasm? You need to hold an iPad if you haven't, because it is thin while still easily held.
I think many are missing the point. When they iPhone came out it had nothing new, nothing. Neither did the 3G. Every bit of tech in those phone had existed for years. What Apple did was make it all work smoother, better, easier. Apple is taking cutting edge tech (that they shamelessly rip off from the bleeding edge) and they make it approachable to the mainstream.
This had always, from day 1 been Jobs' modus operandi. Most people aren't aware that even the original consumer Mac was just a slick, approachable rip-off of something Xerox had created years before. The iPod was an inferior media player when it came out. Limited formats, lower sound quality. But, Apple came up with iTunes and buh-bye competition.
I have no problem with it, in fact, I think it's genius. Apple has never had the best tech on a spec basis but they have, by far, the slickest, easiest to use and mainstream approachable tech and that is what makes them a success.
ash =o)
rumored specs released. Weighs less than the iPad. The only downside I see is the battery life but that is still longer than my mbp. Also I am curious to how the UI will compare.
http://gizmodo.com/5510143/hp-slate-specs-leaked-compared-to-ipad-in-hp-internal-presentation
I'd give this serious and fair consideration; I can say right off that I would be worried about the battery life (10 hours is way better than 5 hours for my use patterns) and interface (grafting a touch interface onto Windows seems a lot more iffy than using the mature iPhone interface). The advantages are also obvious: it's a computer, with all that entails, eg USB ports etc. I like HP as much as I like Apple, but this seems more like a hobby while the iPad seems like a mission.
Apple is so dumb.
Always waiting until they actually have a product before making a video about it.
The need to show us a concept video of the iDoodle and the iI which will likely be out in 2013 and 2018 respectively.
Stupid Apple.. they freaking almost had the stupid iPad ready to ship by the time they even announced it. Where did they learn how to do business from a box of crackerjacks?
You conveniently forgot about April 8th event where Apple is going to demonstrate iPhone OS 4 which is not ready for release yet. I suspect that they want to put out something to counteract HP and MS.
This is what the iPad SHOULD HAVE been. But, Apple wants too much control and more profit from their products.
I'll be waiting for this device to launch. It has everything the iPad should have:
Ports
Full browser with Flash
Front camera with video conferencing ability
Back camera
And, five hours of battery life is fine with me if I get the features I want.
rumored specs released. Weighs less than the iPad. The only downside I see is the battery life but that is still longer than my mbp. Also I am curious to how the UI will compare.
http://gizmodo.com/5510143/hp-slate-specs-leaked-compared-to-ipad-in-hp-internal-presentation
We have seen these specs before. On the Archos 9.
1GB Ram (non expandable), Atom Processor, Intel integrated graphics are going to provide a fairly painful Windows 7 experience, just like the Archos 9.
Also 32GB isn't going to get you very far as a disk in a windows machine. Say goodbye to half just to install the OS, how do SSDs like being cycled perpetually as virtual memory swap file ...
But hey it will make spec sheet buyers happy. Just like the wonderful Joojoo with Flash!, of course flash currently barely works, heats up the computer and cuts the battery life to 2.5 hours.
HP is reportedly also working on an Android tablet, it might be the dark horse.