View attachment 2102576
I actually don’t know if this shot is any good. It was an experiment. November 2007.
This is from my town under the library. We have a river that runs through the whole town.
Nikon D40X, Nikkor 18-55 mm
55mm, f/10, iso 400, 1/400s
Some of the best shots I have are the ones I think are going to be the worst. Smears, smudges, glowing eyes, etc... Like trying to take a picture of a puppy. Often you just can't do it. You only, if you are lucky, get some random part of their body that isn't in motion. But it goes to the elastic frenetic hyper-mobile root of puppies. If you want to get them still, either get them when sleeping, or focused on something.
I took from an article I read in Wired, I believe, that was from a photographer that said he never deletes shots he takes, and he shared some of the 'bad ones', and they were incredible. He thought of it being like int he old days you shot on film, and had that shot for 'eternity', and even paid to develop it. Some are just precious, perfect, odd, capture so much. *shrug* The only thing wrong is in deleting 'the bad ones'?