Thanks a lot!
Regarding post-processing: I wish I could tell you exactly what I did with that one, but I can't since I worked on several versions that morning. I do recall using a free Photoshop action called "Midnight Glow", the app "Convert to B. and W. Pro", the cloning tool to clean up some garbage, and tweaking with the brightness/contrast and highlight/shadow settings.
After a long period of drought this brand new dam is about to receive it's first rain.
![]()
Canon 400D
1/125, F9, ISO 100
18-55mm
Thanks! Also, just out of curiosity - do you like the D40 more then the DSC-R1?
Wow!
Excellent Shot you have there.
Nykoping hus by night. 21 march 2007.
Canon 350D, 4s f/4.5 ISO1600 17mm
Hi oblomow, just a small comment on your photo. There is no point of using a high ISO when doing long exposures, all it does is introduce noise. Also find out the sweet spot of your lens and set the aperture to that, something like f9 would give sharper results. Try it!![]()
This photo is somehow one of the cutest things I've ever seen. Might I bother you for a higher res image of it? I'd love to have him as a desktop or something.Taken Today near Dundee, Scotland.
![]()
Camera: Panasonic DMC-FZ5
Exposure: 0.005 sec (1/200)
Aperture: f/3.3
Focal Length: 55.2 mm
I think at this point I like the R1 more. It seems to have better color, ergonomics, user interface, features, and the look-down/flip/twist lcd....and that amazing Zeiss lens...
Not that the Nikon is bad; I like a fair bit. The big advantage with that camera is the ability to use specialty lenses, like long tele, super-wide, and macro. But in the normal range, the Sony is the 'man', as it were.
![]()
Daegu, South Korea
February, 2007
Canon A95
Yeah, no kidding. I second that notion.So, look, when your work is being shown in a gallery somewhere, be sure to let us know...
Hey SuperTed - where is that? Sheffeld I gather from Flickr, but do you have more info?
Here is mine for the day, take this weekend of the Portland Observatory in Portland, Maine.
f/8
ISO 100
18mm