Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Sorry but I find the Apple Watch Ultra absolutely ghastly

W

walnuts

macrumors 6502a
Nov 8, 2007
598
357
Brooklyn, NY
I thought about this for a while myself. Honestly, I'm my happy self when I'm wearing casual clothes and a sportier, perhaps bulkier watch.

I know there are technical rules about what size watch is "correct" and what would be appropriate in a formal or dressy occasion. Since I could only afford one watch, I was hesitant to get one watch that would "break the rules" in certain occasions.

But then I realized I should prioritize getting a watch that I am happy with most of the time, instead of focusing on what "works" in very limited situations (where I'm probably not happy with the rest of my clothes anyway). I've made my peace that I will annoy some people in some situations for breaking the rules.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AsherN, shr631, Johnly and 1 other person
F

Farrellcollie

macrumors 6502a
Apr 23, 2011
704
364
pi=e=3 said:
That’s hideous.

1910 wants their watch back. Great grand dad is going to need it when he sends off to the Great War.
Click to expand...
I actually like that watch for what it is. But comparing it to the ultra is sort of silly I think they're two wildly different watches for two very different purposes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: shr631
A

amps

macrumors member
Jul 2, 2009
99
26
I don’t find it all that much different than any other smart watch design. Like the phones, a slab of glass. The size is not all that different than standard 44mm watches. Here’s a comparison to my 44mm Panerai and Sinn U1. If you can handle a standard 45mm watch, the Ultra will fit fine.
B3852E27-C699-4DAE-8643-3DCF067D03C0.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: edhchoe, jazz1 and CharlesShaw
Howard2k

Howard2k

macrumors 603
Mar 10, 2016
5,716
5,675
amps said:
I don’t find it all that much different than any other smart watch design. Like the phones, a slab of glass. The size is not all that different than standard 44mm watches. Here’s a comparison to my 44mm Panerai and Sinn U1. If you can handle a standard 45mm watch, the Ultra will fit fine. View attachment 2082851
Click to expand...


Nice collection. Which one of them is most accurate?

(rhetorical). :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and amps
MLVC

MLVC

macrumors 68000
Apr 30, 2015
1,648
3,816
Maastricht, The Netherlands
ApplesAreSweet&Sour said:
At least half of all Ultra buyers are not keen on its looks but are just coping with its size and looks because Apple hasn’t upgraded battery or SiP on the $399 AW since Series 6.

Apple is giving you two options:

A. Completely new Watch with tons of new features, premium materials, premium display, and 2x battery life. Only cons are size and aesthetics.

Or B. AW “Series 6.2”, aka Series 8, with next to no new features, no battery life improvements, no new SiP. Nothing exciting but size and aesthetics are much better than Ultra.

Either way, I’m sure Apple will give the $399 series 9 markedly better battery than 6-7-8 and a new SiP and then we’ll see how much Ultra owners really love their chunky thick-Watches.

The trade-in value for the Ultra in September 2023 will probably cover the costs of the new Series 9. So it’s just some $300-$400 lost and a year of Chungus McThiccums dragging at your arm.
Click to expand...
I'm sure you can back that statement of "at least half" up with some figures right? You must have done an extensive market research to come up with such a claim. You wouldn't just say something right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toratek, Johnly, azhava and 3 others
solq

solq

Suspended
Sep 9, 2022
410
621
amps said:
I don’t find it all that much different than any other smart watch design. Like the phones, a slab of glass. The size is not all that different than standard 44mm watches. Here’s a comparison to my 44mm Panerai and Sinn U1. If you can handle a standard 45mm watch, the Ultra will fit fine. View attachment 2082851
Click to expand...
I'm not a fan of Panerai but you do justice to yours, it looks better than what's on their website.

The Ultra doesn't belong there, it's rectangular, an ugly little brick.

Not like a normal smartwatch either (I had a few).

I am genuinely puzzled by people buying Apple watches, they all seem horrid to me. Ugly design, bad user interface. I guess it's like Volvos, boring, ugly and crappy, but with enough fans out there.
 
M

Macalway

macrumors 601
Aug 7, 2013
4,198
2,947
In person, the Ultra is very nice. It would be wise to reserve judgment on this until you can check it out.

The band issue: Again, you need to try these (if you can).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jacoblee23
C

Cpives

macrumors member
Jul 9, 2015
82
42
DD88 said:
I’d agree but Ive seen people wearing these monstrosities with suits on so yeah….that’s that theory out of the way
Click to expand...
No it's not. That's like saying a Ferrari isn't a sports car because I once saw a bloke drive to work in one.
 
Madhatter32

Madhatter32

macrumors 65816
Apr 17, 2020
1,479
2,952
WoodTableFromIkea said:
Any device, if you take good care of it, lasts more than 5 years.

Your "argument" is crap.
Click to expand...
Don't be rude. You entirely missed the point of my so-called "argument," which is not crap -- in fact, it is indisputable (which is why I marked it rhetorical).

Apple itself states that people will need to replace the battery on the Apple Watch in three years (at an expense that may or may not be worth it). The OS support is limited to 5-7 years like most Apple devices. The hardware itself has electronic components which have a limited lifespan. These are not controversial statements. Either you did not understand the point of my so-called "argument" or you disagree with common knowledge. But, assuming both devices are well-maintained and not accidentally damaged, the Panerai will most likely outlive the Ultra by a magnitude of decades -- that is a fact and that was the point of the "argument."
 
CyberDavis

CyberDavis

macrumors 6502
Sep 26, 2022
262
442
solq said:
I am genuinely puzzled by people buying Apple watches, they all seem horrid to me. Ugly design, bad user interface. I guess it's like Volvos, boring, ugly and crappy, but with enough fans out there.
Click to expand...
I guess we are all different and like different things.
I personally like the Apple Watch and the Ultra really hit the spot for me.
As for interface I think it is ok, and after having a Garmin for running it felt like a breath of fresh air.😂
My wife likes her AW and as a non technical user the fact she is happy must mean the interface can’t be all bad.

As I say it’s all subjective and it is absolutely your right to dislike it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carbphrek, haruhiko, shr631 and 1 other person
D

DSTOFEL

macrumors 65816
Feb 11, 2011
1,063
817
DD88 said:
Having looked at most peoples photos of their new watches, I’m happy you’re all liking them but I think the majority won’t. Wearing a 49mm watch in this day and age is ABSURD unless you’re in the SAS or completely ripped and your arms are massive. Right now I’m seeing these watches just overtaking peoples wrists to the point it is comical, sorry but I think they just look awful.
I understand that you need more screen real estate to swipe and have apps etc, but the concept of apps and other add ons all integrated into a watch to a watch purist like myself doesn’t sit right with me at all. It’s gimmicky as hell and that’s why I’ll always stick with Rolex or JLC for my watches as they actually know how to make a proper watch
Im not alone in this thought either, below is a picture of someone with a 45mm apple Watch and the top comment is “looks like you have an iPad mini on your wrist” which is a perfect description, and the new ultra is 4mm bigger ! 😆😆
Just ridiculous honestly and Apple should be really contemplating who makes their decisions because most people would never sign off on a watch that big.

View attachment 2081656
View attachment 2081655
Click to expand...
Interesting! Going by your chart, the Ultra might just be custom made for me! My wrist measures 8 3/16 inches. Here‘s my 46mm Pilot watch…which I love! I’ve also got a 45mm S7 that fits fine (ie looks normal).
B8D57DC1-9847-4300-A464-2C6DD9908A09.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fried_Gold
D

DSTOFEL

macrumors 65816
Feb 11, 2011
1,063
817
ApplesAreSweet&Sour said:
At least half of all Ultra buyers are not keen on its looks but are just coping with its size and looks because Apple hasn’t upgraded battery or SiP on the $399 AW since Series 6.

Apple is giving you two options:

A. Completely new Watch with tons of new features, premium materials, premium display, and 2x battery life. Only cons are size and aesthetics.

Or B. AW “Series 6.2”, aka Series 8, with next to no new features, no battery life improvements, no new SiP. Nothing exciting but size and aesthetics are much better than Ultra.

Either way, I’m sure Apple will give the $399 series 9 markedly better battery than 6-7-8 and a new SiP and then we’ll see how much Ultra owners really love their chunky thick-Watches.

The trade-in value for the Ultra in September 2023 will probably cover the costs of the new Series 9. So it’s just some $300-$400 lost and a year of Chungus McThiccums dragging at your arm.
Click to expand...
Very logical analysis! Why are you on Macrumors? 😊. Kidding. There’s a reason Apple didn’t focus much on the S8. They wanted to sell the Ultra this year! Then next year they can sell a ton of AW 9’s with the flat display and squared off body:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko and Night Spring
J

Johnly

macrumors regular
Sep 15, 2022
123
229
theotherphil said:
Guy with tiny wrists complains that cool watches won't fit him and disses everybody else for wearing them. You should probably stick to a 38mm and leave others to wear what they're happy with.
Click to expand...
It is quite fascinating the time people put into this thread trying to convince everyone to think the same. It’s quite obvious Apple hit a home run. There are a couple people that find it the Ultra mind boggling. It’s like they are in an Ultra disbelief. Well, Apple certainly hasn’t expended its choices and I am sure people will continue to find ghastly products. (How a watch could be ghastly is beyond me) The market will decide this one I am quite confident 👍🍺 Now that the watch won’t work for a couple people, maybe they will start a thread on what does work and why? Enlighten us, no haters lol. Different stroke’s different folks. There is always another year, then another, year after year lol!! 😆
 
jazz1

jazz1

Contributor
Aug 19, 2002
4,685
19,978
Mid-West USA
Ultra owners. I should probably just try one on in person. I have small wrists, and the Apple Watch 7 fits, but it is a close fit to my wrist bump. Any Ultra owners with small wrists?
 
O

OnawaAfrica

Cancelled
Jul 26, 2019
470
377
DD88 said:
Having looked at most peoples photos of their new watches, I’m happy you’re all liking them but I think the majority won’t. Wearing a 49mm watch in this day and age is ABSURD unless you’re in the SAS or completely ripped and your arms are massive. Right now I’m seeing these watches just overtaking peoples wrists to the point it is comical, sorry but I think they just look awful.
I understand that you need more screen real estate to swipe and have apps etc, but the concept of apps and other add ons all integrated into a watch to a watch purist like myself doesn’t sit right with me at all. It’s gimmicky as hell and that’s why I’ll always stick with Rolex or JLC for my watches as they actually know how to make a proper watch
Im not alone in this thought either, below is a picture of someone with a 45mm apple Watch and the top comment is “looks like you have an iPad mini on your wrist” which is a perfect description, and the new ultra is 4mm bigger ! 😆😆
Just ridiculous honestly and Apple should be really contemplating who makes their decisions because most people would never sign off on a watch that big.
View attachment 2081651
View attachment 2081656
View attachment 2081655 View attachment 2081653
Click to expand...
lol good for u u dont like it. i like it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean006 and jbachandouris
M

Monkswhiskers

macrumors 6502a
Feb 6, 2018
852
684
I like the flat display with lip but not the fat bulge, so for series 9 please Apple - 45mm size with flat sides and curved underside for comfort
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom