Agreed. I've yet to see a photo yet of it on wrist that doesn't look ridiculous. No offence to anyone. If you like it, more power to you.
To be fair, most photos of watches on wrists make the watch look bigger than it is. If you snap a photo of your watch on your wrist right now and compare it to what you see with your eyes, the picture will make it look a couple of mm bigger.Agreed. I've yet to see a photo yet of it on wrist that doesn't look ridiculous. No offence to anyone. If you like it, more power to you.
I bought the 8. Had the 7 SBTi edition. Had the Ultra for a few days, returned it and went with the 8.At this point I am wondering if anyone has bought the 8 or if everyone is either going 7 or less or to the Ultra because it is different in some form regardless of actual need or aesthetics.
Why would they make a rugged style adventure watch without bezels?It’s the bezels that ruin it for me. The watch faces, designed for the series 7/8 look terrible with the bezels. They probably could have easily made it bezel-less…but probably leaving that for the Ultra 2.
I bought the S8. I like the look of the Ultra and it's no bigger than the Garmin I've been wearing, but none of the features stood out as 'must haves' to me. At least not to the point of spending that much more for the Ultra.At this point I am wondering if anyone has bought the 8 or if everyone is either going 7 or less or to the Ultra because it is different in some form regardless of actual need or aesthetics.
The issue for me is the fonts used. The Hermes faces look so much better and more sophisticated purely because of the typeface.The watch faces designed for the apple watch pretty much look terrible on all of the models regardless of bezel or not. Most of them don't really take advantage of the full screen or give the faces any depth anyway. They are flat and not thought out. The wayfinder is ok, i like some of the Nike faces. I just think they ALL could be much more thought at and branded by apple.
It is heavier than other apple watches for sure, but lighter than many traditional watches.Saw it in person yesterday finally. Holy **** is that thing massive and heavy. People who are saying otherwise are huffing some serious copium. I personally think it will look ridiculous on nearly everyone that isn’t a pretty big dude.
The issue for me is the fonts used. The Hermes faces look so much better and more sophisticated purely because of the typeface.
It is heavier than other apple watches for sure, but lighter than many traditional watches.
I guess it depends what you are used to and what you like.
I always liked larger watches so the Ultra works for me.
Says the person that wears a 41mm lolSaw it in person yesterday finally. Holy **** is that thing massive and heavy. People who are saying otherwise are huffing some serious copium. I personally think it will look ridiculous on nearly everyone that isn’t a pretty big dude.
Saw it in person yesterday finally. Holy **** is that thing massive and heavy. People who are saying otherwise are huffing some serious copium. I personally think it will look ridiculous on nearly everyone that isn’t a pretty big dude.
Saw it in person yesterday finally. Holy **** is that thing massive and heavy. People who are saying otherwise are huffing some serious copium. I personally think it will look ridiculous on nearly everyone that isn’t a pretty big dude.
Hey look at that, I've been blocked by the user you quoted. Cool like it when that happens.I’d be sending whoever designed it and released it home with their P45
I think it can only be considered copium if people who were previously/otherwise opposed to large watches (or some other feature of the Ultra) are choosing to go against their preferences just to have the newest and best Apple device (aka coping).Saw it in person yesterday finally. Holy **** is that thing massive and heavy. People who are saying otherwise are huffing some serious copium.
Just put my Apple Watch ultra on while wearing my skinny jeans. 😂Everything.
Sad? Not really.I think it can only be considered copium if people who were previously/otherwise opposed to large watches (or some other feature of the Ultra) are choosing to go against their preferences just to have the newest and best Apple device (aka coping).
It's been pretty well established that there is a nontrivial consumer base that was waiting and hoping for an Apple Watch to be released with the Ultra's size and characteristics, which your statement conveniently ignores. The size/heft of the Ultra is completely non-unique in the watch world; tons of products exist that are similar or larger.
It sounds like someone is just a wittle sad that Apple didn't release a new design that was more to their preferences. We feel for you.
Sad? Not really.
Disappointed in Apple's general direction of putting more features into larger devices, maybe a little.
More rugged means larger. If you want fitness features in a smaller device, there are alternatives such as FitBit.Sad? Not really.
Disappointed in Apple's general direction of putting more features into larger devices, maybe a little.
I'm almost certain they will come out with additional Ultra models in the future. This first offering seems like they're essentially testing the waters with the one size & only one color. Assuming this first Ultra sells well, which it almost certainly will, they'll probably expand with different sizes/colors within the next year or two.Yep I wear a 41mm. It seems like Apple has decided to differentiate their watches somewhat by gender. They put a lot of emphasis on the old style watches having period tracking, and then marketed the watch with more features to men by only having a size that men would typically choose to wear.
I am actually kinda sad to see this trend to be honest. I am hoping they make a smaller watch with a flat screen and action button next year.