Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

JT2002TJ

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2013
2,086
1,413
I'm almost certain they will come out with additional Ultra models in the future. This first offering seems like they're essentially testing the waters with the one size & only one color. Assuming this first Ultra sells well, which it almost certainly will, they'll probably expand with different sizes/colors within the next year or two.

I will replace my Ultra when they come put with a SS case. I'm looking forward to that, this is my first non-SS AW, and I already have a small mark on it. The 4 SS AWs I've had looked brand new years into use.

I know they will come out with all the other cases, at some point.
 

Night Spring

macrumors G5
Jul 17, 2008
14,886
8,056
They put a lot of emphasis on the old style watches having period tracking, and then marketed the watch with more features to men by only having a size that men would typically choose to wear.
I disagree about the size of the ultra being only for men. My mom wears a 45mm Apple watch, and the ultra is only slightly larger. I'm sure my mom and other women of similar and larger statue could wear the ultra with no problem. I'm smaller, but when I tried the ultra on at a store, it looked large, but still wearable.

Would I like the features of the ultra in a smaller package? Sure! But as another poster said, more features require more room. As it is, the ultra is the only full-featured sports watch I know of that I could even consider wearing. Check any other maker's sports watch lineup, and they have huge top-of-the-line models that are too big for me, and smaller, "for women" models that have less features.

I think Apple did the best they could to come up with a sports watch that could be worn by people of all sizes, and came very close to succeeding.
 

wepiii

macrumors 6502a
Sep 22, 2012
553
153
0D705BFF-D637-42CB-AB77-F76254D57296.jpeg
I feel like it looks utilitarian, but not ugly or big. I definitely wouldn’t wear it with a suit if I wanted to look super nice, but I don’t ever wear a suit so it works fine for me.
 

Dealmans

Suspended
Mar 12, 2022
1,405
1,213
I disagree about the size of the ultra being only for men. My mom wears a 45mm Apple watch, and the ultra is only slightly larger. I'm sure my mom and other women of similar and larger statue could wear the ultra with no problem. I'm smaller, but when I tried the ultra on at a store, it looked large, but still wearable.

Would I like the features of the ultra in a smaller package? Sure! But as another poster said, more features require more room. As it is, the ultra is the only full-featured sports watch I know of that I could even consider wearing. Check any other maker's sports watch lineup, and they have huge top-of-the-line models that are too big for me, and smaller, "for women" models that have less features.

I think Apple did the best they could to come up with a sports watch that could be worn by people of all sizes, and came very close to succeeding.
Personally I am glad the less people wearing them the better lol, the percentage of women buying them will be very low.
The look size and weight is more suited towards men imo.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Kitkat52

random person

macrumors 6502a
Feb 28, 2008
730
234
This debate is a curious one. For me, the Ultra is about function, pure and simple. I have a size 130 wrist — size zero in solo loop — and I am coming from a 41 aluminum. In the past I would never have dreamed of a size 45 Apple Watch — too big for the same functionality. The Ultra is different. It’s functionality is different. It replaces my Garmin Fenix 5s which is also large but again I bought it for its functionality. I also have a large Tag titanium dive watch — it’s large for a reason, appropriate to its functionality. I am no fan of Garmin’s retro screen and dreadful software, but I put up with it for its function. The Ultra is just so much better on every level. Yes it is big but I don’t notice that when I use it the way it was intended to be used — fitness and so on. As for the weight I dont notice it at all even coming from a 41 aluminum. The bands are really comfortable and very well designed. The fact that this outdoor fitness device is being debated for its “looks” speaks volumes to Apple’s prowess, because we now want to wear this Ultra all the time! I doubt those debates ever surfaced for Garmin or Dive watches — we never expected them to be fashion statements. And maybe the Ultra isn’t the most fashionable Apple Watch, but it is certainly the best one they have ever made. The bands fit my wrist and Apple planned it that way, one watch for all. The battery alone dictates the size of the watch case. Given how well it works I am personally grateful that they didn’t try to “shrink it and pink it.” I love mine Just as it is.
 

mactexas

macrumors newbie
Sep 30, 2022
6
18
And yet after wearing the Ultra it has become my favorite Apple Watch design. It does not feel, or look, as big on my wrist as I had feared. In every way, for me, it has been better than anticipated. Ever the Ocean band is quite nice and comfortable.

Every person has an opinion and visual perspective of their own. Doesn’t make one better than another, just individualized.
 

Attachments

  • 84F26ADF-78EB-40DD-AC2D-AF133E181423.jpeg
    84F26ADF-78EB-40DD-AC2D-AF133E181423.jpeg
    637.4 KB · Views: 150

shr631

macrumors 6502a
Dec 13, 2013
881
968
Personally I am glad the less people wearing them the better lol, the percentage of women buying them will be very low.
The look size and weight is more suited towards men imo.
Too few wearers could result in a discontinued product. You’d be glad about fewer women buying them?
 

babalougots

macrumors regular
May 5, 2021
136
321
The Ultra is a breath of fresh year after a stale 7 year design that essentially looked the same year after year. We finally get a lip that will protect the screen plus it's flat which looks awesome. Orange accents are awesome too. If you think it's ugly, that's cool. But the Ultra IMO looks simply terrific.
My guess is next year's Series 9 will have a lip and a flat look but otherwise keep same form factor of the Series 8, et. al. This is what the rumored Series 7 renders depicted and nothing came of it. My $0.02
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dealmans

IT Provisor

macrumors regular
Sep 23, 2022
103
128
California, USA
I don't usually defend Apple. But most of the "more features" require more room, so you end up with a larger device.
It makes me wonder if they’ll make the Series 9 a little thicker to put a bigger battery in for a more comparable experience to the Ultra. After all, that’s the #1 reason to get an Ultra, at least for me…
 

techspin

macrumors 6502a
Jul 21, 2014
819
397
And yet after wearing the Ultra it has become my favorite Apple Watch design. It does not feel, or look, as big on my wrist as I had feared. In every way, for me, it has been better than anticipated. Ever the Ocean band is quite nice and comfortable.

Every person has an opinion and visual perspective of their own. Doesn’t make one better than another, just individualized.

That hair adds an inch of padding. Time for me to shop for some rogaine for my wrist. 🥲
 

tmoerel

Suspended
Jan 24, 2008
1,005
1,570
It is funny. Everyone seems to be discussing how ugly or nice the Ultra us but that is juste a question of taste. You can argue your point but you will never be right or wrong.
But there is one thing no one seem to talk about. That is how light this watch is. Apple did a great job at giving us a bigger and rugged watch with more battery without making the thing excessively heavy.
I own quite a few watches that are smaller though heavier. This thing is barely noticeable on my wrist.
 

RPhoto

macrumors 65816
Jul 18, 2010
1,130
2,294
Surrey, UK
It is funny. Everyone seems to be discussing how ugly or nice the Ultra us but that is juste a question of taste. You can argue your point but you will never be right or wrong.
But there is one thing no one seem to talk about. That is how light this watch is. Apple did a great job at giving us a bigger and rugged watch with more battery without making the thing excessively heavy.
I own quite a few watches that are smaller though heavier. This thing is barely noticeable on my wrist.
The problem is there are people in this world whose opinion they consider as fact, and are very aggressive in wanting to make sure everyone knows they’re right.

Agreed with the weight. Amazingly light for what it is!!
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,328
25,489
Wales, United Kingdom
Having looked at most peoples photos of their new watches, I’m happy you’re all liking them but I think the majority won’t. Wearing a 49mm watch in this day and age is ABSURD unless you’re in the SAS or completely ripped and your arms are massive. Right now I’m seeing these watches just overtaking peoples wrists to the point it is comical, sorry but I think they just look awful.
I understand that you need more screen real estate to swipe and have apps etc, but the concept of apps and other add ons all integrated into a watch to a watch purist like myself doesn’t sit right with me at all. It’s gimmicky as hell and that’s why I’ll always stick with Rolex or JLC for my watches as they actually know how to make a proper watch
Im not alone in this thought either, below is a picture of someone with a 45mm apple Watch and the top comment is “looks like you have an iPad mini on your wrist” which is a perfect description, and the new ultra is 4mm bigger !
Just ridiculous honestly and Apple should be really contemplating who makes their decisions because most people would never sign off on a watch that big.
View attachment 2081651
View attachment 2081656
View attachment 2081655 View attachment 2081653

I agree with you that it’s far too big on people who don’t have 8”+ wrists. I’ve seen some of the pics shared on here and people are clearly happy with it and it’s a very personal choice, but for me they look comically huge. I have a 7” wrist and wear the 41mm AW as I like a watch that is in proportion with my wrist. I like to see strap either side of the face and not have a screen that is the same width or wider than the top of my wrist. I wear smart clothes to work and a huge watch would look pretty ridiculous on me. The Ultra I suppose is a sports watch though and many will wear it for activities but not necessarily with a shirt or suit. It’s also a very industrial looking watch and in general aesthetics it’s not really to my tastes personally. I certainly don’t like a watch that stands a staggering 14mm off the wrist. I do think Apple need to make a smaller version of it next year as they are reducing their market releasing it in one very large size.

Edit: corrections due to iPhones appalling autocorrect technology.
 
Last edited:

ArchEtech

macrumors 6502
Sep 25, 2022
474
429
LWDS is soemthing we should all be concerned with. It is something we shouldn’t take for granted as it’s really starting to take hold in the Apple community.

Large Watch Derangement Syndrome first started as a minor problem at WatchCrunch.com but fairly quickly took hold about 5 or so years ago. It’s since spread to various watch enthusiast sites, particularly the Dieselwatch.com community where it continues to plague severs and provide ongoing treatment needs from moderators.

I am concerned for the Apple community. First it starts with breaking very important restrictions on wrist to watch face ratios. This can really occur regardless of the materials used, or the weight of the Watch though there is certainly a direct correlation between size, materials and weight that can’t be denied. As the severity of the derangement takes hold, watch faces and cases can end up protruding beyond the edges of the arm and wrist.

Consequently as it takes hold, and people fall deep into the syndrome they forget to account the cost on their body and emotional well-being. These complications can include but are not limited to:

1) Nerve damage and Carpel tunnel syndrome if the wrist size to Watch ratio overloads the muscles and bone structures of the lower arm and wrist over time.

2) Skin irritation exacerbated by excessive weight shifting, and friction caused by certain band materials or wearing the watch too tight

3) Frequent tendencies of sufferers to utilize incorrect colors, improper material types, and grossly oversized bands to compensate for LWDS side effects. This can lead to breaking very problematic and required social norms, isolating a victim from family and friends, and of course lead to frequent conflicts with their online communities. That is why I bring it up.

It’s something that we need to take seriously, and discuss here before it becomes a serious issue.

I wanted to start a thread about it, but I didn’t want to get in trouble.
 

MarkX

macrumors 65816
Sep 10, 2015
1,204
1,503
Fochabers, Scotland
LWDS is soemthing we should all be concerned with. It is something we shouldn’t take for granted as it’s really starting to take hold in the Apple community.

Large Watch Derangement Syndrome first started as a minor problem at WatchCrunch.com but fairly quickly took hold about 5 or so years ago. It’s since spread to various watch enthusiast sites, particularly the Dieselwatch.com community where it continues to plague severs and provide ongoing treatment needs from moderators.

I am concerned for the Apple community. First it starts with breaking very important restrictions on wrist to watch face ratios. This can really occur regardless of the materials used, or the weight of the Watch though there is certainly a direct correlation between size, materials and weight that can’t be denied. As the severity of the derangement takes hold, watch faces and cases can end up protruding beyond the edges of the arm and wrist.

Consequently as it takes hold, and people fall deep into the syndrome they forget to account the cost on their body and emotional well-being. These complications can include but are not limited to:

1) Nerve damage and Carpel tunnel syndrome if the wrist size to Watch ratio overloads the muscles and bone structures of the lower arm and wrist over time.

2) Skin irritation exacerbated by excessive weight shifting, and friction caused by certain band materials or wearing the watch too tight

3) Frequent tendencies of sufferers to utilize incorrect colors, improper material types, and grossly oversized bands to compensate for LWDS side effects. This can lead to breaking very problematic and required social norms, isolating a victim from family and friends, and of course lead to frequent conflicts with their online communities. That is why I bring it up.

It’s something that we need to take seriously, and discuss here before it becomes a serious issue.

I wanted to start a thread about it, but I didn’t want to get in trouble.

Could you link me to the wrist size to watch face ratio restrictions please?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.