This was book example of bad publicity!
As I said, it almost feels like M$ is behind it - thats how bad this is...
There are such things as bad publicity.
Advertising is about association and linking.
This is a product placement with (At least) 2 levels, so it's pretty different from standard direct advertising:
- I see "The product associated to a guy". (direct advertising)
- I see "The guy with the product associated to the audience". (indirect advertising. What people will think of the first association. This is very important in live product placement)
So, I start to associate the ipad to this funny guy, but then i start associating the "funny guy+ ipad association" with "what other thinks of this association". And who are those others?
- movie/tv stars (fashion image leaders, projection of who i want to be like and "think" like.) and family members (projection of the affective world, who I love, who I want to be loved by.).
And their reaction were not that good.
If you watch the faces of the "stars" Kidman & co, they are not impressed at all and a bit ashamed of what's happening.
And the recation of the daughter.. argh, that was bad.
So at the end the message could be interpreted as:
"Look, a cool guy have the cool device from apple. But wait, look how the stars and the family look at him, he actually doesn't look cool anymore."