This argument is hilarious. Instead of fighting like children how about we just look at the facts and understand that, as usual, it's a matter of perspective?
If you want a Wacom digitizer you already know it and you're in the minority. For me it's a big deal, but that's because I draw, I wrestle with differential equations (and lose), draw out concept diagrams for ideas... I think and function visually and find it extremely useful to be able to carry an infinite sketchbook with me at all times (I always have my phone no matter what I'm doing).
For everyone else (most people) none of this is helpful. In business note-taking is mainly writing, and the state of even the highest end digitizers today (Wacom's Cintiq line) is that they're still not sufficiently paper-like to allow them to be an efficient way to write. If you're very experienced with these digitizers you can do it (quite legibly), but it is still slower and requires more focus than actually writing on paper (or typing obviously).
There is one general user benefit, and that's the ability to use the stylus for precise manipulation (text selection primarily). In practice I don't think this is sufficient to sway anyone on the issue.
But we can't just see each other's sides of the story and agree that we have different needs, can we? Everyone needs to tell everyone else that their side is the only true side.
