He is to blame for not seeing where this whole thing was going and left Cook in a pickle for slumping sales. Would have been the same if he was "in charge".Again how is he to blame for NOT copying Microsoft's vision (because that's what you are wanting him to do) ? Before Timmy took over the iPad was already the best tablet on the planet with zero competition so why change the formula?
There is a lot more to pro than a faster processor and a better display. iPad Pro only has the above . Surface while not completely useful for dedicated productivity (as I mentioned above) is still good for productivity on the go because it can run desktop and legacy office apps so the naming is justified to a extent . However the only true pro device is the Surface Book
We can agree to disagree on what the moniker pro means. If you are against apple at this point, one will rail against them. If you are for apple, you can see their point. Very simple really. Whether you think the SP4 is a pro device is irrelevant. Microsoft gave it that name. And in that realm I can see why it's a pro device, the same as why apple gave their devices a pro moniker. But again, this is all personal viewpoints; subjective at best.