Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

QCassidy352

macrumors G5
Mar 20, 2003
12,066
6,107
Bay Area
All the voice commands used to control the Tesla are local to the car. This was in response to those who feel the need to have physical buttons. I have not missed them in my M3. I have a Ram 1500 with lots of buttons that I never press... I also have an A4 where I have to look to figure out what buttons actually do (same with the BMW), to divert the Air to different places takes my eyes off the road for a considerable amount of time.

Sure, would be nice to be able to press a button and say what I wanted.
This x100. I thought no buttons would be a bad user experience, but it’s fantastic. Driving my wife’s Prius prime with its dozens of buttons feels borderline absurd now. So needlessly complex.
 

HDFan

Contributor
Jun 30, 2007
7,290
3,340
I thought no buttons would be a bad user experience, but it’s fantastic.

I have only limited experience with Carplay but I absolutely prefer buttons. With a touch screen you have to look at the screen in order to touch or select the correct area. With buttons I can by touch chose the audio source, zoom in/out navigation, change volume, etc. without having to look at the console.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SalisburySam

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
56,994
56,019
Behind the Lens, UK
I have only limited experience with Carplay but I absolutely prefer buttons. With a touch screen you have to look at the screen in order to touch or select the correct area. With buttons I can by touch chose the audio source, zoom in/out navigation, change volume, etc. without having to look at the console.
With buttons you soon become so accustomed to the ones you use often, you never look away to use them. They are just there where you need them. I like the fact that I can program certain buttons in my BMW. Navigate home, one button. Call Mrs AFB one button. Favourite radio station. One button. Safe.
 

mittencuh

macrumors regular
Nov 4, 2012
146
192
Colorado Springs
With buttons you soon become so accustomed to the ones you use often, you never look away to use them. They are just there where you need them. I like the fact that I can program certain buttons in my BMW. Navigate home, one button. Call Mrs AFB one button. Favourite radio station. One button. Safe.
It’s a big mistake IMO for BMW to do away with the favorite buttons.
 

jim0266

macrumors member
Jun 17, 2009
58
35
We have a Tesla Model 3, a 2014 Nissan Leaf and Chevy Bolt. They are each fantastic for their use case. If I could only have one car, it's the Tesla hands down for the tech, supercharging network and resale value. Plus it's fun to drive. The Bolt has been a fantastic commuter car. It's my wife's DD. It has 60k miles on it. She loves it, but he is also not a car person. A Tesla would be lost on her. The Leaf is my beater errand car. It was dirt cheap used, less then $10K and it only had 8,700 miles on it when I purchased it in 2017. Put 30k more miles on it to date. We've taken the Tesla on multiple long road trips. I would never want to drive anything else. AutoPilot is a game changer to relieve stress and fatigue.

You could not pay me to go back to an ICE car. We have about 100k miles of pure electric travel so far.
 

VictorTango777

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2017
893
1,634
I have only limited experience with Carplay but I absolutely prefer buttons. With a touch screen you have to look at the screen in order to touch or select the correct area. With buttons I can by touch chose the audio source, zoom in/out navigation, change volume, etc. without having to look at the console.

Let's be clear. If a car had physical buttons, but those buttons were also constantly changing their functions, you would dislike it just as much as a touchscreen. So the real issue is not physical vs. on-screen buttons. it is persistent and direct access to commonly used functions, where those buttons are always visible and in the same place, and doesn't require navigating through multiple layers of menus.
 

Tagbert

macrumors 603
Jun 22, 2011
6,254
7,280
Seattle
I'll attest (as a Volt Owner) that physical buttons that actuate are better than capacitive buttons as well.
The Volt (at least the Gen 2. I have no experience with the Gen 1) has a pretty good mix of physical and virtual controls. The primary controls used while driving are all physical buttons. The virtual controls are more about configuration or dynamic buttons like the radio presets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyb3rdud3

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,438
2,664
OBX
The Volt (at least the Gen 2. I have no experience with the Gen 1) has a pretty good mix of physical and virtual controls. The primary controls used while driving are all physical buttons. The virtual controls are more about configuration or dynamic buttons like the radio presets.
I have a Gen 1. Gen 2 has more physical buttons because folks complained about the capacitive ones in Gen 1, lol.
 

SalisburySam

macrumors 6502a
May 19, 2019
923
812
Salisbury, North Carolina
I have a Gen 1. Gen 2 has more physical buttons because folks complained about the capacitive ones in Gen 1, lol.
Interesting. Same happened with Tesla and their minimalist approach in early Model 3’s. Tesla’s response was different than Chevy’s though. Tesla removed more physical controls and on the S/X models replaced buttons with capacitive ones. Some learn from feedback, others pursue their own agenda regardless of feedback.
 

cyb3rdud3

macrumors 601
Jun 22, 2014
4,081
2,751
UK
It won't sell in big volumes, but even for my toys electric is looking interesting.

 

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,438
2,664
OBX
Interesting. Same happened with Tesla and their minimalist approach in early Model 3’s. Tesla’s response was different than Chevy’s though. Tesla removed more physical controls and on the S/X models replaced buttons with capacitive ones. Some learn from feedback, others pursue their own agenda regardless of feedback.
I know a few folks with the newer S/X and haven't really spent time in those vehicles to say much about them. The 3 did take a bit to get used to though.

I don't advocate for automakers to follow in those footsteps though.
 

JT2002TJ

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2013
2,068
1,397
You don’t have to have navigation on the screen for “Full Self Driving” to work, so why can’t it just run in the background. I’ve often used BMW’s navigation system while having CarPlay active so the navigation directions would show up in the instrument cluster.

How would that work with EAP/FSD where the car is actually navigating for you? Carplay's Apple/Google/Waze maps are routing you one way, and Tesla's UI is not only routing you differently, but actually maneuvering the vehicle? The difference between your BMW experience and Tesla is, if you subscribe/pay for EAP/FSD, the car will actually be navigating for you, so it would not be a good user experience to have Tesla's maps in the background.

Now if you put your apple device in the background, then there is no need for Carplay, it can be handled via Bluetooth.

Carplay would be nice, but most people I know who own Tesla's seem to not miss it. I put my phone on my wireless charger, with Waze open, and I listen to notifications of redlight camera's, speed cameras, police, and hazards. I don't need it on my screen where I have my FSD Beta interface (showing the road, vehicles around me) and Maps on the other 2/3rds of the screen. I also have my SiriusXM streaming via my phone (I do wish it was built into the car like S/X has/had, I would even pay to have a module added).

I can see Carplay being less intrusive on a S/X with a cluster above the steering wheel, but in the 3/Y with a single screen, it would get in the way of the 15" screen that I currently use the full screen for vital info.
 

SactoGuy18

macrumors 601
Sep 11, 2006
4,733
1,798
Sacramento, CA USA
Look, if you want something with relatively decent range per charge, it appears we really have one choice: a Tesla Model 3 or Y Long Range. This recent Carwow video from YouTube shows why:


I would consider a Model Y Long-Range, but I do worry about the quality control issues, though.
 

cyb3rdud3

macrumors 601
Jun 22, 2014
4,081
2,751
UK
Look, if you want something with relatively decent range per charge, it appears we really have one choice: a Tesla Model 3 or Y Long Range. This recent Carwow video from YouTube shows why:


I would consider a Model Y Long-Range, but I do worry about the quality control issues, though.
Codswallop. I'd add the Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6, Volvo XC40, BMW i4 and Polestar 2 to that list ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tagbert

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
56,994
56,019
Behind the Lens, UK
Look, if you want something with relatively decent range per charge, it appears we really have one choice: a Tesla Model 3 or Y Long Range. This recent Carwow video from YouTube shows why:


I would consider a Model Y Long-Range, but I do worry about the quality control issues, though.
I
Look, if you want something with relatively decent range per charge, it appears we really have one choice: a Tesla Model 3 or Y Long Range. This recent Carwow video from YouTube shows why:


I would consider a Model Y Long-Range, but I do worry about the quality control issues, though.
I don't think that’s completely true. For example I get more than the 3.9 miles per kWh in my i3. Yes it won’t do as long range but that is not the be all and end all of choosing an EV. I looked at a number of models before choosing mine but Tesla didn’t make the short list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyb3rdud3

cyb3rdud3

macrumors 601
Jun 22, 2014
4,081
2,751
UK
Given the size of the USA and the still unreliable CCS 1 charging networks here, I'd still take a Tesla Model Y (for now).
In that context, possibly. Although I know plenty with the models I mentioned that have no issues.

CarWow is UK based, and its main business is actually being an introducer to sell cars. So always keep that in mind with their videos, it is for commercial gain with an agenda. But besides that, there is no material difference here between CCS2 and Tesla, both are just as good nowadays. Besides for 90%+ of peoples journeys they never have to publicly charge.
 

SactoGuy18

macrumors 601
Sep 11, 2006
4,733
1,798
Sacramento, CA USA
In that context, possibly. Although I know plenty with the models I mentioned that have no issues.

CarWow is UK based, and its main business is actually being an introducer to sell cars. So always keep that in mind with their videos, it is for commercial gain with an agenda. But besides that, there is no material difference here between CCS2 and Tesla, both are just as good nowadays. Besides for 90%+ of peoples journeys they never have to publicly charge.
CCS 2 tend to be pretty reliable in Europe (mostly). But there has been a lot of issues with CCS 1 networks here in the USA, unfortunately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyb3rdud3

JT2002TJ

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2013
2,068
1,397
Interesting concept building on the i3 concept. Lightweight and efficient.

That is a very interesting concept. Something that I could possibly see working in LA, and maybe NYC, but not anywhere else in the US. Unfortunately, these kinds of small vehicles have little success here (ICE or EV).

I do understand it isn't something that would be designed and marketed for here.
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,314
25,463
Wales, United Kingdom
That is a very interesting concept. Something that I could possibly see working in LA, and maybe NYC, but not anywhere else in the US. Unfortunately, these kinds of small vehicles have little success here (ICE or EV).

I do understand it isn't something that would be designed and marketed for here.

Indeed different markets and needs, and the same reason many of the huge cars and SUV’s in the US would never be marketed in Europe.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.