I just find it hilarious when some apple fanboys...
Sorry, stopped reading right there.
I just find it hilarious when some apple fanboys...
When was this though? This is a bit like saying I hate IOS because it doesn't have an app store or even cut and paste (which was the experience at one time). The latest versions of Andriod are really good, better than IOS I would dare say. I am a fan of both, but Andriod is edging out now.
Competition is good and we are very lucky to have two awesome choices.
Edit: And when I say the Android experience, it is only fair to compare vs the true Google phones (ie Nexus). Everything else is acquired through Open Source and tweaked (usually in a bad way). Not a fair comparison.
Here I'm telling you my unbiased opinion. I'm currently using the iPhone 6. I used to use the iPhone 6 plus and boy, the app crashed and phone sometimes reboot way more often than my note 4. Android is very stable now, even more than ios.
Yep. Confirmed by this study.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Android-4.x-is-more-than-twice-as-stable-as-iOS-7.1_id54459
Some apple fans just felt they have been shot in the heart.
Its still smaller than my Apple Newton.
The funny thing is that we actually have a religious debate about which platform is better. These are multi billion dollar corporations that don't give a crap about any of us. Its all about profit. Both are really good at what they do but we should not forget why they are doing it.
I don't hate Android. The irritating Android fanboys who keep ragging on us Apple users however, that's fair game, IMO. You want the gate to stop? Tell them to keep to their side of the fence, then we will talk.
In fairness, that's soooort of a misleading way of putting it. 1.7% versus 0.7% is a difference of 1%. That's sort of like two guys practicing 3 pointers at the gym, one gets one and the other gets two and says "dude I LITERALLY got twice as many as you did."
Numbers don't lie, but the people who use them are often dishonest...
I look at it differently. In one day you open (any) apps 100x. Using iOS you are TWICE more likely to lose your data due to app crashes IN ONE DAY.
Think of Android as the guinea pigs for new tech. Apple usually lags behind in bringing new technology, if it weren't for Android, iOS wouldn't be where it is now. Comparing the two, who had LTE first? What about contactless payments via NFC? MMS? Cut and paste? True multitasking? Front facing cameras? Etc
I do admit that Apple implements technology in a very good way, but what really annoys me is how Apple and its fans play off many of their new features as innovative, when others have had it for a while. Many Apple users are so close minded, they think if Apple hasn't done it, no one has.What's funny is I'm over on Reddit getting bombarded with people who refuse to believe that Apple isn't the most innovative company on the planet and everything the iPhone has done has been just the vanguard of technology.
I do admit that Apple implements technology in a very good way, but what really annoys me is how Apple and its fans play off many of their new features as innovative, when others have had it for a while. Many Apple users are so close minded, they think if Apple hasn't done it, no one has.
The other thing is when Apple fans play these features off as useless until Apple does it. "Who needs LTE? 3G is plenty fast", or " why would anyone need NFC on a phone?", or "No one wants a phone bigger than 4 inches"
See, the thing is, it's actually incorrect to say that Android is twice as stable. It's, in fact, half as unstable. These are not the same. iOS is twice as unstable as Android, but it is not half as stable. If iOS had a 60% crash rate and Android had a 20% crash rate, then Android would be twice as stable (Android was stable 80% of the time and iOS was stable 40% of the time).
In point of fact, since we're talking 99.3% stability for Android and 98.3% stability for iOS, we can say that Android is about 1% more stable. In a given run of X times, Android will have about 1% more successful runs than iOS, that's all. Not twice as many. It's completely misrepresentative to say "twice as stable".
See what you mean. It is just the different interpretation. You are associating "stable" with non-crash time. But you can also interpret "stable" based on the count of failure. Of course "twice as stable" can be confusing. I think better phrase is ios apps "crash twice as much" android.
That would be linguistically incorrect to do it any other way.
Think of it like this. If there were two airlines, one in which 1% of its planes crashed annually, and one in which 2% did, you would be correct in saying you were twice as likely to die in the second case, but you would NOT be correct to say you would be twice as likely to live in the first case.
Are you a Android fanboy? You don't like Apple's products? But beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Yep. Confirmed by this study.
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Android-4.x-is-more-than-twice-as-stable-as-iOS-7.1_id54459
Some apple fans just felt they have been shot in the heart.
And exactly what is skewed on the study?Skewed data much?
You and this report are ignoring the fact that kitkat was only available on the newest android devices while iOS 7.x was available to phones built as long ago as 2010.
And exactly what is skewed on the study?
Lost an arm!
I just said what was skewed:/
They didn't take into account the differences between the hardware using each OS.
Show me a comparison of, say, the Nexus 5 on kitkat 4.4.4 vs the iPhone 5S on iOS 7.1 and then we'll have a fair comparison