A review: mainly Apple Human Interface Guidelines, a little more about Steve Jobs
Apologies for the length of this post. Reviewing some key points from the past two or three months.
Apple Human Interface Guidelines (HIG)
At the time of the first public beta:
If you were to attempt to rewrite the current human interface guidelines to reflect Yosemite in its current state it would be impossible to do so in a coherent way.
too many inconsistencies.
The new OS X Human Interface Guidelines
https://developer.apple.com/library...lines/index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20000957
I hope this gives a better insight into the reasoning behind all these changes.
Apple still has the discipline to document their reasoning
Its a lot to digest.
Thanks. The first incoherences were easy to find
misunderstanding/misinterpretation of basic HTML by Apple, and so on. In response to a complaint, on Twitter, about Apple's BS in the new HIG:
as someone said, the Apple HIG reads more like an explanation or excuse than a logical process that led to Yosemite
Some of the best parts of a previously outstanding operating system are reduced to a sandpit. A pit that's simply not fit for exquisite finishing touches.
Yosemite is in itself, and as a potential platform for third party apps far from the most visually consistent operating system ever. Apple appears to ignore the true answers to some fundamental questions.
Can the novel appearance be applied consistently to all types of windowed app?
Emphatically: no!
Critically: where the novel appearance
is applied, there are inconsistencies. A day after OS X 10.10 was released, someone with good knowledge of Apple Macs, in particular observed (without reference to HIG) that with Yosemite, Apple's signals to developers
lack the clarity of past signals with the "combined title bar and toolbar area" (I must use that phrase loosely) as one of two prominent examples.
Side note: I don't know when, if ever, I'll read the Ars Technica review in its entirety. I read only around a quarter, relating to my interests (no need to read
in detail about new features and so on; I'll rarely touch Yosemite).
the devil is in detail
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
Safari is an interesting case here because its a bit weird.
title exactly follows the UI guidelines.
quirky on the reinterpretation of what a website title means. Let's look at it in detail.
To sum it up, I don't really see any reason to claim that Yosemite's design violates the fundamental UI principles which have been adopted by Apple. One could argue
Design is a formal system while principles are formal constraints. While there obviously is some freedom in interpreting
Freedom of interpretation is no bad thing. Be kind to developers, and so on.
I must be harsh about the apparent
degradation in quality of Apple Human Interface Guidelines.
Lack of clarity; lack of consistency; freedom of interpretation; trendiness; freshness and novelty but (from Apple) maybe no modernity to the design; extraordinarily negative reactions from some customers; and so on what will result from that combination of things?
Few unordered thoughts (I have to prepare my lectures so I can't spend too much time polishing this post, sorry)
1.
no way to confuse the Calculator, Calendar, Messages and Contacts
do not need a title to be distinguishable
.
2. Safari
Apple has desired to obscure the
title in a single-page mode, which can be argued as limitation of usability.
3.
where to expect the website title
4.
Yosemite employs clear visual cues to mark key areas tranclucenty, contrast and animations.
5. A different question is about identifiability of a window area. This is a more complicated topic.
a valid concern.
Yosemite requires relearning of some habits
I do not believe however, that the concept leads to impaired identifiability.
quite consistent within itself and in regards to Apple's design guidelines
There is
less consistency in the looks of Yosemite than in the looks of Mavericks.
lack of title in Safari is a usability impairment and should be fixed.
in my opinion, Yosemite interface comes very close to what Apple would have designed if they would want to create Aqua in modern time.
Sorry, there's great disagreement on that point.
I can not imagine that the 'old' Apple would have allowed something so generally mashed-up as Yosemite to be released.
Realising beauty, finding pleasure in the things that preceded Yosemite
10.6, despite how damn ugly it is.
I used Mac OS X 10.6.8 for a while today, at an iMac that can't run Lion. I find the appearance of Snow Leopard extremely pleasant. The same is true for all versions of Mac OS X (including OS X) before Yosemite. And I can't remember hating anything about the looks of Apple operating systems on Macs in the Motorola era.
I'm a lifelong Apple user, and I'm sorry, this is the worst OS Apple has ever released.
the primary thrust of this update seems to have been the design, which is just horrible.
I rarely if ever jump on message boards to complain about things, but I need to vent. I will probably roll back to Mavericks.
the most frustrating OS X upgrade
Mac user since 2007
Apple no longer has good UI design
I'm rolling back to Mavericks right now. If my Mac ever breaks I doubt I will buy another
It's been fun, Mac, but you just let yourself go and you're not hot anymore.
Tepid, maybe.
Look at that hot mess.
What happened to consistency in the Mac OS? It used to be the poster child for good UIs
It bothers me because its amateurish
rather than classy, consistent, and polished like it should be.
I dont like to see the Mac crumble into the kind of inconsistent, tacky disarray which in the past always characterized Windows.
It puzzles and disappoints me.
Apple has a clear set of UI design guidelines and best practices. And while the new design elements can obviously be abused, its not like it was not the case before.
Bottomline: its OK for windows to look differently.
eliminate the title bar is a welcome thing for many apps (e.g. Calendar, Address Book, Calculator and the like).
grahamperrin said:
when I suspend all arguments and prejudice, there's an acid test: do I enjoy Yosemite after a week or two away?
No. Calmly, patiently and clearly: the potential to enjoy using Mac hardware is reduced by Yosemite.
too far against the grain. Honestly, and I'm not being overdramatic, my gut tells me that it's wrong to condone development of something that is essentially going in a wrong direction. I am that reactionary person, but it's not a knee-jerk.
Mavericks is fundamentally far more pleasing to me.
I'm with OldGuyTom on the essence. The opening line. Overall, yes: Yosemite looks terrible!
More reflection on the Steve Jobs era
don't know Jobs, Ive or Cook personally but now I'm tempted to read a book about Jobs. I have one in mind.
It's worth considering these three words, each one in isolation:
from a dictionary definition of the latter, "
an excessive enthusiasm or desire; an obsession:
he had a mania for automobiles".
I don't know Jobs. I assume that his superego had a generally healthy effect on Apple's human interface guidelines.
I
do know plenty of Macs. If Steve Jobs had excessive
enthusiasm for Macs, then I can not fault that excess.
I don't know who had the last word in the Jobs era, but I believe that
Apple no longer has a single, clear, shared vision for OS X.
Complaints a new era for Apple?
I'm less interested in the number of people complaining. More interested in the nature and passion of people's complaints. It may take weeks to get to the heart of a complaint.
Extremely negative reactions should be recognised as a sign that Yosemite will be far from the best operating system.
With Yosemite it was too often more difficult to understand, at a glance, what was on-screen.
expect some third party software to become more difficult to use as a direct result of the lacklustre examples set by Apple.
I do not see a guiding logic. The proof is in the pudding, and Yosemite appears to be a mixture of things. No single, clear, shared vision of the ingredients or the recipe. The overall taste is repellent to me.
I fear that Apple will ignore some of the serious complaints.
In some areas, the company appears to follow a strange mixture of leads; appears to ignore what was good about its past operating systems for the Mac.
A rush is not necessarily a good thing.
In the months and years ahead, it'll be interesting to compare the measurements given by GoSquared
Continuing that subject:
Pre-Launch Adoption of OS X Yosemite 33 Times Higher Than for Mavericks discussion there includes post-launch observations (more to follow).
I wonder about levels of satisfaction a year or so from now
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d9/f40d9887da4d1c079af3db8ac5cb58390e8d50e6" alt="Apple :apple: :apple:"